Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Kodiak

Members
  • Posts

    436
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kodiak

  1. Thank you for clarifying. It was very forced in college, but it was never actually explained to me why.

    I don't think our instructor understood that it was not always meant to be used.

     

     

    I'm impressed by your opened attitude!

     

    I'm also impressed by instructors omitting to

    mention the great importance and limitations

    of CMYK.

     

    As most my work (65%) is directed towards

    publishing/printing, the ins and outs of CMYK

    are an integer part of my workflow.

  2.  

    when resizing a document to a large print size with 300 dpi the pixels amount is increasing above and beyond the original pixels size. what does it means in terms of print quality?

     

     

    There are two issues in this question…

    1. Resizing

       

      Increasing the size (in pixel) is not an easy task.

      No software does it well but the "lesser evil" is

      produced through Perfect Resize from OnOne

      —pretty much the industry standard.

       

    2. Quality strategy

       

      Resampling to add (or subtract) pixels always results in at least some loss of quality (sharpness, detail, etc.)

      +1

      …and this is the reason why one should perform

      the "resizing" prior to any PP except DRL, WB,

      and tonal balance.

  3. Hi, what is the best way to convert rgb images to cmyk for print with Affinity Photo? Thanks

     

     

    The common and clever practice is to stay

    in RGB or ProRGB to perform any, all post-

    production works and only convert the final

    file to CMYK for the printer.

     

    It is a win-win situation where both the proces-

    sing power & time and files sizes are kept within

    more reasonable 3 channels rather than 4.

     

    If starting with a RAW file, one will not have to

    bother with that since RAWs have no colour

    space (they are not images but recorded data). 

     

    If a files needs to go through a pixel editor, it can

    be converted at the end of the process.

     

    One is well advised to…

    • stay in the RAW converter as long as possible
    • stay in RGB colour space until the end.
  4. I love seeing wildlife pictures, to be brutally sincere, I don't care a bit even if they have not even been saved or edited with Affinity's, as I'm not from Affinity's staff or a forum moderator... I just like the pics... :D I bet a lot think like me.... (hence the huge amount of views  -yet no posts: When I admire a landscape, I usually don't talk, just look and enjoy... ;) -  in Kodiak's posts  ...)

     

    I'll get some more soon enough… for you pleasure I hope!

  5.  

    When I learned the Photo could develop RAW files

    I was all hopeful and excited at the idea to try it…

    but was disappointed within 5 minutes.

     

    As much as I believe AF Photo will replace PS for me

    as pixel editor, I realized that, for my operations, the

    Raw conversion is not that yet as…

    1. one can only work on a single file at the time and
    2. the controls are illogical to me, too close to LR and
      not close enough to real RAW conversion.

    I don't believe that AF Photo is the right tool to learn RAW

    converting at this point…maybe with later improvements.

     

    I could not imagine teaching or mentoring sessions on RAW

    processing with it and make it fun as it should be.

     

     

  6. Alas, my internet connection is unstable and slow. D-load failed yesterday, and cut out today after only a few minutes of the tutorial was saved. But what I saw was very good. I'm not a photographer, and what I was able to see framed the development issues very well. I'll try again some other day. It is fine educational entertainment.

     

    Now, that's quite receivable and with great pleasure!

     

    I hope your connection will work better! :)

  7. wow! That was an encyclopedia of good information packed into a 12 minute video. Thanks for sharing it.

     

    Cool, glad the effort was good to someone :)

     

    I have yet to send any photos out to a lab for printing but your video makes me think it would be best to give the lab files with the same intent that you use for magazine/book publishers. In other words, does it make sense to send files to a printing company with a little room left for them to adjust? Or, do I need to get it correct the first time? I'm talking about photos that I would hang in my own house, not professional for sale photos.

     

    In no way! For photo printing, one has to test the lab. Publish

    a jpg file the way you would like to see it and have it printed.

    If all goes well, then fine. If not, tweak in your converter, republish

    and retest until satisfied. DON'T GIVE THE LAB ANY FREEDOM!

    Unless they are knowledgeable AND friends.

  8. …this is stellar work …

     

     

    You're just too kind… too many things went wrong in there.

    1. I was fighting so much not to cough or sneeze given my cold

       

    2. my famous FM voice was showing signs of throat irritation

       

    3. at 10.4 min, Marie's son (using his mother's Skype connection) was

      telling me that he's out of the shower and ready for his session

       

    4. I was very aware (too aware) of the recording and, being the first time, 

      that drove me crazy… I could hear all the English mistakes, I was thinking

      in French as I was talking…

       

    5. etc.

    It was a first and I leaned quite a bit!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.