Kimo
Members-
Posts
25 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
733 profile views
-
Yea. i just realized that when i want a hexagon to fit a size 140 mm box, it requires a hexagon with size 161,7 to fit. and i cant get it to connect lines from corner to corner, it pins it off with a few pixels. I honestly have to go back in illustrator, until this is fixed. which is a bit annoying, since all my Work are in affinity. In short. a 14 cm Hexagon, doesn't fit a 14 cm wide/high box.
-
Hi there. I am a big talker for affinity over illustrator. However i have found a Huge minus... I am going on Ucl university in Denmark. And we work a lot with prototyping ideas, which later will see the marked. And for the technical drawings of these i have talked alot about affinity as an affordable solution, compared to Illustrator. But one of the main tools we use are a laser cutter, for wood or plexiglas. But this is where i found the biggest issue. The laser cutter need a stroke width on 0,01 And affinity can only get so far as to 0,1 in stroke width. This is a huge problem, since ill then need another program like illustrator or inscape to convert my drawings, making the work i do in affinity Kinda worthless. Now why is this such a big issue? well every school/ university in my country has the same setup. Which means that illustrator would be chose over affinity, by every student and future firm, simply because it can corporate with lasercutters and other machines. thx for you time.
-
Kimo reacted to a post in a topic: **his Gradient layer vs mine rectangle layer** Help!
-
Kimo reacted to a post in a topic: **his Gradient layer vs mine rectangle layer** Help!
-
Kimo reacted to a post in a topic: **his Gradient layer vs mine rectangle layer** Help!
-
Kimo reacted to a post in a topic: **his Gradient layer vs mine rectangle layer** Help!
-
yes indeed.. and if i wanted that, for 3 layers of curves. I would have to make a combine copy, add the color to that copy, and then place it beneath my 3 curves right?.. which again means that when ever i edit one of my 3 curves, i would have to edit my combined curve also? basically what i am trying to attempt is not possible.
-
Thx for your answer and your file. This is what i current have done with my setup. But i have a color layer for every curve i have around 30+, which seems like Alot to work with. and i am trying to group them together, and have 1 layer for like 5-10 curves... my issue is that i only can "1 curve with color Vs placing a big fat rectangle across the entire picture". i could use a greadiant, as you did. but i would like to keep that for a more detailed effect later in the progress. (i think).
-
I am sorry if i sound confused. my native language is not english, and i do have some issue separate the terminology.. based on you lates comment it seem i did misunderstood his video. Would i be correct to say that if he moves a node in his design, the "masked" rectangle would fill the entire shape? I will go through the tutorial you mentioned to see if i can get a better grasp on it. What i hoped to achieve was a "group" of curves that had a "shared" base color. and when edited, the color would follow with it, as long its inside the rectangle. and the on top of that add multiple colors/shadows/effets to the single curve layer. i am not even sure this is possible, but the video made me believe it was. in any case thank you for your dedication and answers, even tho i seem confused they do help me "see" the difference in what i am thinking and really doing.
-
Kimo reacted to a post in a topic: **his Gradient layer vs mine rectangle layer** Help!
-
This seems very accurate. I am trying to recreate this *If I understood the tutorial, the fellow had a bunch of loosely drawn shapes that he wanted to unify into a single silhouette. So he added them, and gave them a uniform fill. But then he placed copies of the original shapes onto the unified one, and added various color gradients and transparencies.* And i have, but in his video he can manipulate the "overall" shapes by using the nodes. if i try do the same thing, then when i manipulate the nodes, my colored layer/Overall shape stays where it is. (ofc, this seem logical). but either i don't understand the setup in his video, or i misunderstand my curve/layers... shall we say attributes/abilities.
-
Thc for your detailed response Firstdefence, i really appreciate it. So i have been testing your compound setup. It does allows me to color the entire compound. and i am able to edit the curves. However what i am looking for is a way to color the background of a group of curves/layers, and then individual give those layers another gradient. in your compound setup it's the compound itself that holds the color. which means that it's hierarchy wont allow layers beneath to have a different color. which is the solution Alessandro Castellani show in his video. But when i try to recreate it on my computer, the color eiter fills the entire square or only 1 part of mye (curve group). and i don't understand why. I need the color layer to be lowest in the hierarchy.
-
That was something i did understand, but thx anyway... it made it more clear for me to recognize somehow. But from my point of view, i though i already had created a curve layer... more specific layer- curve, curse, curve , rectangle(color). so in my head this should work, i should now have 3 curves with a compared layer of color. or is it the first "layer" that's the issue?, since it a layer and not a curve. *(from what i understand from other forums it don't have a gender yet, and therefore it shouldn't matter). Or does it have to be a Curve-curve,curve, curve, rectangle. layer for this to work? Sorry if i sound confused, i really want to understand this. I saw one of you comments on another thread. so you seem to be very knowledgeable on this area.