Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Dudemeister

Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dudemeister

  1. 25 minutes ago, Design_Guy said:

    only single vector shapes and they can be only brought in into motion one at at time. if you want them still vectorized anyway. it's a huge limitation, it's frustrating it cannot be solved at the moment

    You can't help continuing with your clueless nonsense, can you?? With the ILLUSTRATOR script you can bring any and all vectors into Motion as shapes! Unless you want to share how you're getting any vectors into Motion otherwise?? Oh right… you can't! So what are you going on about?

     

    25 minutes ago, Design_Guy said:

    Honestly this makes me want to just pay for a year of CC at this point.

    Yes… PLEASE DO!

     

    25 minutes ago, Design_Guy said:

    Allowing scripting doesn't seem unreasonable at this point either if Affinity didn't feel like tinkering with it themselves.

    Holy sh… could you please just STFU?? This is NOT a shortcoming of Motion! Motion files (and with it shapes) are simple HTML! So if Affinity doesn't OUTPUT the file needed then there's zero that Motion i.e. Apple can do!

     

    25 minutes ago, Design_Guy said:

    You basically need a time-machine to get an illustrator cs6 license and Adobe doesn't even want you using it anymore so Motionize

    WTF are you blathering about?? The script works just fine to this day.

    Do yourself a favor and just don't answer anymore to avoid making an even BIGGER fool of yourself. Thanks!

  2. On 2/8/2018 at 10:21 AM, Gerard Nijenbrinks said:

    Where's the copy/past develop settings button?

    Yes! This is AN ABSOLUTE MUST! I'm painfully disappointed that this isn't in the app, where e.g. Lightroom for iPad has it.

    Any word on WHEN this will be added? No roadmap or anything?? Because before it is, this is absolutely useless to me and I'm back to having to rent my software. >:(

    DM

  3. 9 hours ago, Old Bruce said:

    You can skew in the Transform Studio, I agree with you that the little arrows are very fickle.

    Oh for :70_poop:s sake… no kidding! Thanks! I would NEVER have suspected it OUTSIDE of the object boundaries. :32_expressionless: It would actually make FAR more sense to simply put it on a modification key! Scale without anything, SKEW with e.g. OPTION or even COMMAND or whatever.

     

    Cheers.

  4. On 8/8/2017 at 4:25 PM, Mischugo said:

    The interface is from 1985 (?) Sorry! Not useful for me ;)

    YIKES!

    More like the 70's, no?? My eyes are bleeding. And it would appear not to have been updated since then either. Doesn't even run on Mojave. Yay… what a great recommendation. :34_rolling_eyes:¬¬

     

     

    On 5/7/2015 at 3:51 PM, Leigh said:

    Here's a direct link to the Vimeo video: https://vimeo.com/110134439

    I've watched that video OVER AND OVER now and can't for the life of me figure out how you're getting the UP/DOWN arrow when on the RIGHT edge of the selected object! No matter what I do, all I ever get is a LEFT/RIGHT arrow for SCALING! This is SO frustrating. Fighting to get something so BASIC done! What am I missing??! How do I move (skew) the right edge of a selected object UP AND DOWN??

  5. 13 minutes ago, Matthias said:

    Like being in total control of the quality of the shipping product since Affinity surely would be blamed for any third party plug-in failure

    Well, it's not like there aren't ways of protecting the app from that. Look at Workflow Extensions in Final Cut Pro X for example. There's no way (as opposed to e.g. Premiere Pro and their extensions mess) that a Workflow Extension can crash FCP, because they did it in an intelligent way. So if an extension fails, it's clearly the extension's i.e. the developer's fault.

    But I also don't see scripts being a stability issue either way. The worst that could happen is you get worthless output.

  6. Well, treating others like moron noobies isn't exactly helpful. As if not everyone and their mother didn't already know that a RASTERIZED image is an option. That being the reason for THIS THREAD, because THAT IS NOT ENOUGH:34_rolling_eyes: Which part are you not getting?

    Never mind that some PSD is never going to give me anywhere near the flexibility and quality that a LAYER VECTOR GRAPHIC will, and that at just a FRACTION of the size!

  7. I can guarantee that no other third party apps are even close to doing any kind of round trip import/export of PSD files while maintaining fully editable text - and without changing the text in some way.

     

    Hate to disappoint you there, but I just tried the same file with Pixelmatorwithout issue. But yes, with other files it has similar problems, so I'd say that half true at best.

     

    And yes, I'm sure that it's not easy and even more sure that Adobe of all people are far from interested in helping. They're just interested in keeping your work for ran$om.

     

    Unfortunately that deplorable and (otherwise) unacceptable approach seems to have worked it's magic, since, as I've said, an issue like this makes Photo — at least for THIS — a complete no-go. And honestly makes me quite nervous with other things as well! I deal with getting things such as lower thirds from clients as templates that need to be edited for context on a daily basis. Clearly not something I can hope to do with Photo at this point.

     

    @MEB The leading in the original file was not changed the least bit i.e. is and was the exact same as the first. Cheers.

  8. To import PSD text as editable text into Affinity Designer you must check Import PSD text as text rather than bitmap in Affinity Preferences, General section, otherwise it will be rasterised on import.

     

    Which is ironic, since that's exactly the setting I have, but still the second text in the example file came in rasterized. That was my point. Well, I certainly hope you get the whole thing straightened out soon!

  9. Seriously? <_<

     

    Well, I just uploaded a random "TEXT.psd" for the hell of it, but do you guys not have Illustrator? Because all you need to do is make any random Illustrator file containing text and save it as a PSD and you can have all the test-files you want! Because this is not some sort of exception, it's the rule.

     

    Interestingly, in this particular file, for the first time, at least one of two lines of text make it over, but… only because it was rasterized! What the &%??… why would this happen?? That defeats any and all purpose of exchanging files with editable text (which it is and stays in Photoshop)!

     

    Like I said, more than unfortunate and plain disappointing. Until this is resolved there is no way that I can use Photo, nor recommend it to anyone. Especially since you've known about this for at least 10 months. 

     

    And text should most definitely not be rasterized before it's exported. Again, as in Photoshop. At least not if you expect to lure even the most basic Photoshop user to Photo.

  10. Having the exact same issue with PSDs that came from Illustrator CC, making "Photo" completely useless for me. The copy/paste suggestion most definitely is not an option and obviously completely unprofessional. Very unfortunate.

     

    Never mind that the text in general, any text, looks absolutely horrible in Photo in comparison as well, even if it's "only" in the canvas and not the final export.

  11. Currently on the website of Mark Spencer, there is a plugin to convert Illustrator vectors into an editable format for Motion 5.

     

     

    That plugin is age old and not anywhere near as useful as "Motionize" from Scott Ash. In fact I don't think it even works anymore.

     

    Speaking of which, couldn't one simply reverse-engineer what either plugins i.e. scripts are doing and simply make a Designer compatible version of it. That is, assuming Designer even HAS any type of plugin API to cater to, I don't even know. Or is that notion just too naive?

     

    Whatever is doable, I'd most certainly +1 it and it would eliminate one of the very last reasons I have for still keeping Illustrator on my machine.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.