Jump to content
Our response time is longer than usual currently. We're working to answer users as quickly as possible and thank you for your continued patience.


New Members
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. I see. Thank you for that. I can see good results with four images now I have shot handheld.
  2. Thanks but none of this seems to work in Affinity. I have tried handheld with 30 images but still don't see any difference. If you halve the opacity as you go down the stack you quickly get to less than 1%, so I don't see how they have used a 20 image stack.
  3. Hi @Callum Because I want to print at large size with minimal loss of quality. I can get to 48" at 150dpi using stacking and resampling, but I don't see any difference at native resolution between the stack group and a pixel layer (except that the mean operator sharpens the image a little). The images are not shot handheld. Perhaps that is the problem?
  4. Hi all I have seen the various videos on stacking but am trying to use it for simple resolution increase - I am starting with a 16MB raw file and ideally want to print from a jpeg at 48" wide. This requires a raw file of about 100MB. I have seen stacking used in this way in Photoshop by resampling a large stack 200%, but this doesn't get me to that size. Would it be possible in AP and how many images would it require?
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please note there is currently a delay in replying to some post. See pinned thread in the Questions forum. These are the Terms of Use you will be asked to agree to if you join the forum. | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.