ugly mask

Yes... as R.C.R said, you can click the gear icon next to transform in mcaro panel

ah... I see I don't think about using align before. previously I tried to get to coordinates 0,0 using transform. thank you, this helps me a lot

Thank you for your help, it works well on the test document you provide. although there is one layer that was missed (layer 2). can you tell me what you did to the macro so i can build it myself? There will be some photo combination templates that I have to make. there is no way I always ask for help in forums for almost the same thing

I clarify my steps This is the result when I dragged those 10 photos from explorer to affinity. the coordinates / positions are always random, and I can't make the photos always have the same coordinates when dragging from explorer. As I remember using PS, its position was always in the middle when I dragged files from explorer. then I recorded the macros to the position as shown below. this is the final position I want these are the coordinates of the position I want, with the reference point in the upper left corner of the photo when I redo to the position like the first image, and run the macro. the results are as I expected but when I drag a new photos again, it will get a different position like the image 1 (drag.png). I find it difficult to place the photos in the same position as image 1. the results are as below and the result when I run the macro is like this

I tried to make a macro to put 10 photos (3x4cm) to a 4R template in the position shown below. the problem is that I've recorded the macros, and put the photos at the proper coordinates. but when the macro is executed, the result is messed up. not like the photo above it turns out that what is recorded in the macro is not the final position (coordinates) of the photo, but an offset from its original position. even though the initial position when dragging a photo from explorer to affinity is always different. Likewise with resizing photos, what is recorded is the percentage change in size, not the final size result. but in my case the most important thing is the position / coordinates of the photo. I tried to record macros using the snap assist with the guide lines, the result was still messy, even though on PS it worked fine Any suggestion?