Thanks for the prompt reply Matt!
I’m learning from multiple sources, it’s the one thing that sticks out the most in all the tutorials I learn from.
Currently in Designer(v1.5):
1st approach:
Click and drag
Assess next anchor point/segment
If node modifications is not required, move forward with curvature, else:
Sharp node required,
Move mouse back to latest anchor point
Alt + Click to change
Click on next node point
Repeat
With the 2nd approach, as you’ve politely described, I suspect the cognitive load would be higher without necessarily increasing efficiency. The prognosticating of a node! To calculate 2 segments + 1 handle in return for one correct node placement (all without a path preview!). I suppose this approach makes accuracy higher on the first pass through but kinda feels moot. In my humble observation, more often than not, fine tuning the handle happens regardless (unless you’re a spatial genius, hehehe).
The additional of a Ctrl Key modifier (yes please!!) greatly reduces the work and cognitive load to:
Click and drag
Assess next anchor point/segment
If no node modifications required, move forward with curvature, else:
CTRL + click next anchor point
Repeat
It’s a ‘proactive’ (high cognitive load) vs ‘reactive’ (low cognitive load) method of performing an identical task, I guess. No flow disruption and a huge time saver IMO!
A great man once said to Larry Kenyon that by making the boot time of the original Mac faster he would be saving dozens of lives because of the compounded time saved. Please save lives, it’s worth it. Hehehe.
https://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?story=Saving_Lives.txt
P.S. I apologise if there was any ignorance above and thank you for reading. The more I use Designer, the more I like it!