ALe5

Hi there, with 1.9.0 update, it doesn't quit anymore. It's smooth and reliable very well done! I do much appreciate the commitment to keep your valuable tool efficient... Thank you guys!

It does it either way

Hello Chris, is there any positive feedback useful to know about this issue yet? Would be nice to use that feature on photo taken with Irix 15mm. thanks

I've used jpegs and no it doesn't quit, isn't doing it even on converted full size NEF/SRW. It happens with NEF/SRW only...

Thank "You" Would they eventually publish here some results?

Hi Chris, this is last that has been created after producing what's trigger the crash thanks in advance a6c2fafc-7bca-4307-b874-4bc7dc0bbd3d.dmp

Hello, the issue reported above is still annoying and sometime won't let me do the work. Is there any suggestion that may solve it? Thank you, regards

Hi, as soon I try to adjust "vertical" lens distortions the program quit unexpectedly. I find useful to save a little step in one of the other four lens correction adjustments, but not the vertical or a series of adjustments other wise will crash over and again. I find a trick that most of the time works. Once saved keep doing the work, most of the time will let me use the "vertical" and finish without crash. NEF file attached. _D8X1358.NEF

I suspected that... thank you Walter

As passionate know nothing... Instead of making people to even consider if AP is convenient for them to buy it, cause the above mentioned approach; would you consider to add 1 more button to choose parent company adjustments instead AP raw RAW file in develop persona only. Don't know the degree of difficulty in doing so...

I was just saying that Beta has improved the under exposure aspect.

Is a test with the Beta. Is enough as a good point?

I knew all of the above, thank you. But perhaps, what ever file will be saved with in some instances, working the AP file, details will degrade a bit or a lot depending on the adjustments applied. Oh I see! Well this in knew to me. Then anon2 is right: I neglected!.. Is all new world, now when shootin' I have to invent/imagine what AP file will look like. Isn't a counter producing that? What is the good in this AP approach? That is not the only reason I bought AP, actually it has many quality. Some quite good adjustments (intuitive and with great effect). Even if I know I have to explore and learn how to use them well. The final results, for what I have done so far is satisfying. Nonetheless is monthly hassle free. Then photography has the purist side too: no PP needed!

The D90 NEF file

Of course what do I know? I know nothing... Bug or not, problem or issue, Jpeg or RGB, that is not the point .. I'm not disagreeing with "you" I disagree with facts! The only thing I'm sure of and see. I do neglect and I'll neglect again in doing what your software is not giving. Why I have to do adjustments here and there to make AP file look like original NEF file? Beside, once developed, image quality end up being a JPEG degraded file. Nikon Nef file looks very close (not always) to what I try to photograph and that is a base to start from. At this time AP is unusable both retail and Beta and for me is not a gain but a loss.. There is no point to buy a software* that can't give a base file to start with as camera have intended to be as I try to. AP it double the work in order to score to a desired image. Beside mine wasn't neglecting but refuse to accept your advice "to adjust" since AP software is not doing it. * If would have known I wouldn't buy it.

As far as I know in order to make viewable RAW data a JPEG version of the RAW is made by any software and what we actually see is a rendered JPEG temporary file. I don't know what AP is using to make a RAW file viewable. I know what a RAW file is. Originally made in camera as a carved piece of marble is impossible to loose data in those files. But in my case in AP when I see a RAW file something is "missing" not lost, (underexposed from -1,5 to -3,5 stops). I bet that when the issue will be fixed histogram will look right.

Hi there, is there any news on addressing our issue? Thank You

Of course it does missing data, what we see is a jpeg file... I think you are confirming what I just said if anything is out the histogram is not viewable... Now that it may not mean that once developed, AP file is not workable but I assure you, in this conditions, some details may get lost after develop and adjustment is apply to make it looks as the original.

Raw file has no adjustment at all, is just as come out of the camera and is completely viewable in the screenshot from the Nikon software that adjustment controls are all set to 0. There is no adjustment done on Picture Control Utility either, even if adjustments would have been applied in Nikon PCU AP should interpret same as Nikon software. The file has been open as is in both Programs without any pre-correction of sorts. You are the technician ... 1 thing I know if is not within the histogram is not viewable.. then other reasons may affect that, I know data is not missing cause is RAW this also is obvious. Since what we see is a jpeg rendering data is missing from that file, as a fact nothing is recoverable from a developed file.

This is the phrase get into my nerve. The 2 files comparison I posted above this comment of yours are so different.. The AP preview is totally out of focus that seems Norton Effect has been apply, Histogram curve's peaks are out of bound, to me data is missing and is slightly underexposed... Repeat my question to your comment: How you can say is correctly interpreted?

If you notice some peaks are cut out the diagram area, means data is missing.

Well, let me be as polite as I can be ... You are another one that is giving me lessons. A moral lesson on how to behave... Do you really think I'm here to take moral lessons from you? About I officially ask for a refund. As is this software is too much of a headache on a dual point of view. Now strange things, sometime happens, that does not go the way we have planned. There is a lot of work I really know of and some I'm not aware of, since I'm not a programmer. Believe me I know a bit and the part I don't I can imagine of what is behind such project of yours; I appreciated that so much that I put my money into it. But I'm not here to take this kind of treat! I did not come here and have to explain my comments. To me you are missing a point and is under your eyes. I don't accept anon2 comments cause are too "obvious" and are a copy of what I say and exposed... is not technically getting to the point; anon2 "try to help" comments are, basically, saying to me that a rotten apple is not shining much but is good... when is, absolutely, not! That may explain my sarcastic comment; disrespect is another thing! Thank you. Thank you Fritz_H. Yes I did and I mentioned about the histogram. This, is just give one more "point of view" to them to investigate. Let me ask you how would you feel if I tell you that "your" file just needs exposure adjustment? (No need to answer) To staff: See, this is a repetition of what I expose to you to evaluate. Is this Fritz_H post help to me? NO! Is his post said something different from mine few already posted? No! But, at least, confirm what I already exposed to you.

Well thank you for trying to help... you say politely? What did I say that is not polite? You say I might learn? You become my teacher at once? Well sorry for not being aware of that. Precisely what is useful to me of all of what you've said? Do I sound like I need a teacher? Or I may need a software that does its job? Just to understand ...

Are u in need of glasses? How could you say that? Look at the difference between the 2 pics... Then that is not D90 file. It seems the encoder is erratic!.. and wrong every time! But the results is unusable software and apparently not only for me. Why I have to start 2 or 3 steps "back?" Is like if I won't mind to start a race with flat tires, dirty windshield and whatever else someone won't like to start with!! I don't even consider your post a suggestion as a solution.

Is counterproductive to use AP, properly because the starting point already "launches" with an handicapped step.. and sorry if I begin to think do I have to ask for money back? Hope not! If this can be of any help: Within the histogram there is a warning sign that says: "RAW histogram. Click to fine rendering". But after clicking there is no change but the yellow triangle disappear. The major difference between the 2 histograms is the way AP is showing the curves, if u look at the blue you may notice that is out the bound of diagram, that justifies the view and the cut of important data missing from the view. Details and clarity lost in "translation!" Hope you can get out of the quagmire.