Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'layernames'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Affinity Support
    • News and Information
    • Affinity Support & Questions
    • Feature Requests & Suggestions
  • Learn and Share
    • Tutorials (Serif and Customer Created Tutorials)
    • Share your work
    • Resources
  • Bug Reporting
    • Report a Bug in Affinity Designer
    • Report a Bug in Affinity Photo
    • Report a Bug in Affinity Publisher
    • (Pre 1.7) Affinity Range Bugs Forums
  • Beta Software Forums
    • Affinity Designer Beta Forums
    • Affinity Photo Beta Forums
    • Affinity Publisher Beta Forums

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 1 result

  1. When layernames in Affinity Designer start with a number, in the SVG export Affinity decided to add an underscore ('_') as prefix to all these ids of these svg elements. This is pretty unwanted behaviour, because we named these layers this way on purpose and want to have the same names in the export as we gave the layers. We don't want names and therefore the svg elements' ids to be changed under the hood. I can't find any good reason why Affinity should change these names; numbers in ID attributes of svg elements are perfectly fine and allowed. Even id's with only numbers in ids are allowed in html/svg. Because of this unwanted name change we have to rename hundred or so layers in some files by hand now and then filter out numbers from the changed layernames when using the svg at runtime by javascript again. That's not really convenient and not very efficient and in my opinion unnececary. I understand that sometimes renaming during svg export could be nececary when layernames would result in illegal ids, but this is not one of those cases. Please, would it be possible for Serif to remove this unwanted and unnececary renaming in the svg output?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please note the Annual Company Closure section in the Terms of Use. These are the Terms of Use you will be asked to agree to if you join the forum. | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.