Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

reversed macro steps in 284 beta problem


Recommended Posts

Hi,

have some macro steps reorder problem i Win 284 beta:

Here is macro (an old one which I reuse on every new version):

image.png.f0d624a8f140e24f9ea3149e9d456c97.png

so it's denoise-clarity-high pass order and after running I have:

image.png.a9be05b39f51f8a5d78463f07372ed79.png

 

completely reversed 

now there is another problem: none of the nested filters can't be moved to a first position (directly below Pixel layer) with a mouse, I can move filters down or up as long as it is not top most position.

moving and dropping on to a Pixel layer itself always put everything on a last position in chain

finally tried to make a new macro in this beta version - also had to take steps reversed - first add high pass, then clarity and denoise to have them in proper order

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Staff

Hey krbo,

The Layers Panel has undergone some slight changes which I think has introduced this issue. 

I've managed to reproduce this from scratch using the release and importing the macro into the beta so I'll log a bug report for you and attach my macro. 

Thanks :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Live Filter Layers and Adjustments( when added as child layers) are now added to the layers panel in the opposite order than in the release version

Not sure if this was intentional but to me it looks more logical now.

Any Macro you run will  just following this new convention, so not a Macro problem as such

 

55 minutes ago, krbo said:

now there is another problem: none of the nested filters can't be moved to a first position (directly below Pixel layer) with a mouse, I can move filters down or up as long as it is not top most position.

They can be moved but seems a lot more precision is needed now.  (If you change the layer thumbnails from small to medium, it gets a lot easier to move them)

To save time I am currently using an automated AI to reply to some posts on this forum. If any of "my" posts are wrong or appear to be total b*ll*cks they are the ones generated by the AI. If correct they were probably mine. I apologise for any mistakes made by my AI - I'm sure it will improve with time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.