PeterB. Posted March 11, 2019 Share Posted March 11, 2019 Hi, I hope this is not a double report but I didn't find something via search. I just did some basic posters in publisher with images and logos. As I exported the publisher document as PDF for print the logos where rasterised (which is not so good as they loose sharpness). I did a bit research and found out that this only happens if the logos are placed inside a picture frame. If I take the same vector file and place it as simple image the export is not being rasterised. To me this doesn't look like a normal behavior so I posted it in this forum and I attached some of the files. Test_Publisher.pdf Test_Vector.afdesign Test_Publisher.afpub Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Bruce Posted March 11, 2019 Share Posted March 11, 2019 1 hour ago, PeterB. said: To me this doesn't look like a normal behavior To me it would be expected behaviour, but I use the picture frames for pixel stuff exclusively and just use the vector stuff as is so to speak. Seeing as they are both images though I understand your reaction, perhaps it should be your way but I see many problems with programming the ability to discern when to do one or the other not to mention the fact that there are pdfs with both being imported. Mac Pro (Late 2013) Mac OS 12.7.4 Affinity Designer 2.4.0 | Affinity Photo 2.4.0 | Affinity Publisher 2.4.0 | Beta versions as they appear. I have never mastered color management, period, so I cannot help with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterB. Posted March 11, 2019 Author Share Posted March 11, 2019 hm... I'm using picture frames for placing content like logos mostly because of the way easier positioning (scale to max fit, center point positioning, etc.) and cropping. This way I've been doing it for years now in other software like InDesign or QuarkXpress. That's why I thought it may be just a bug or so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Bruce Posted March 11, 2019 Share Posted March 11, 2019 41 minutes ago, PeterB. said: That's why I thought it may be just a bug Could well be, as I said they are both image types, so your expectation is fundamentally valid. Maybe a future request is in order if this rastering is expected and the way it works now. Mac Pro (Late 2013) Mac OS 12.7.4 Affinity Designer 2.4.0 | Affinity Photo 2.4.0 | Affinity Publisher 2.4.0 | Beta versions as they appear. I have never mastered color management, period, so I cannot help with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Bohn Posted March 11, 2019 Share Posted March 11, 2019 2 hours ago, PeterB. said: hm... I'm using picture frames for placing content like logos mostly because of the way easier positioning (scale to max fit, center point positioning, etc.) and cropping. This way I've been doing it for years now in other software like InDesign or QuarkXpress. That's why I thought it may be just a bug or so I would expect it to be that way too, Peter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fde101 Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 Smells like a bug to me too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeW Posted March 12, 2019 Share Posted March 12, 2019 6 hours ago, PeterB. said: ...This way I've been doing it for years now in other software like InDesign or QuarkXpress. That's why I thought it may be just a bug or so Neither ID or QXP have separate frames for text or images. The frames "type" will change depending upon the content. QXP can switch the content type at will if a new type of content is dropped in or imported. The picture frames that APub has (similar to what Xara products have for a few versions) are different to the frames in ID/QXP. I am uncertain what I think of APub's picture frames. I'm not certain if I would have a use for them. I dunno whether this is actually a bug--at this point I have seen/read little from Serif as to what to expect with them. Unless they are actually designed to keep vector as vector, though, then this would be intended behavior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterB. Posted March 12, 2019 Author Share Posted March 12, 2019 I did a bit research and experimented with different ways for placing the same vectors in publisher. The more I test the more it looks to me that there is something not right with flattening(?)... there is no need to convert a native vector (moved inside a rectangle) into a pixel graphic... I used a low 36 DPI export just to see quick what is being rasterised. Test_Publisher2.pdf Test_Publisher2.afpub Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staff AdamW Posted March 12, 2019 Staff Share Posted March 12, 2019 Hi PeterB, Thanks for reporting this. Absolutely there should be no rasterisation in the cases you've outlined. We are aware of the issue, why and what is going wrong, and it is down to be fixed with a high priority. MikeW 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterB. Posted March 12, 2019 Author Share Posted March 12, 2019 Great news! Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts