Steps Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 I just realized that all baked-in JPEG export presets have their resampling algorithm set to "bilinar". I may be wrong but as far as I know one should in general choose at least bicubic for a sharper result even if it takes longer. Is the preset optimized for export speed? I think at least the maximum quality preset should use bicubic. Quote Windows 10 Pro x64 (1903). Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3.60GHz, 32 GB memory, NVidia RTX 2080 Affinity Photo 1.7.2.471, Affinity Designer 1.7.2.471, Affinity Publisher 1.7.2.471 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walt.farrell Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 You seem to be equating quality with sharpness. From what I've read, some images will benefit from becoming sharper, but others will suffer. I think the user really needs to make the choice when additional sharpening is being added. Steps 1 Quote -- Walt Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases PC: Desktop: Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Laptop: Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU. Laptop 2: Windows 11 Pro 24H2, 16GB memory, Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E80100 - Qualcomm(R) Oryon(TM) 12 Core CPU 4.01 GHz, Qualcomm(R) Adreno(TM) X1-85 GPU iPad: iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 17.7, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard Mac: 2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sonoma 14.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixx Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 I would prefer this setting to be sticky, so it would keep the last used setting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walt.farrell Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 32 minutes ago, Fixx said: I would prefer this setting to be sticky, so it would keep the last used setting. Wouldn't creating a new preset the care of that for you? Quote -- Walt Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases PC: Desktop: Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Laptop: Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU. Laptop 2: Windows 11 Pro 24H2, 16GB memory, Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E80100 - Qualcomm(R) Oryon(TM) 12 Core CPU 4.01 GHz, Qualcomm(R) Adreno(TM) X1-85 GPU iPad: iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 17.7, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard Mac: 2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sonoma 14.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steps Posted January 6, 2019 Author Share Posted January 6, 2019 2 minutes ago, walt.farrell said: Wouldn't creating a new preset the care of that for you? @Fixx In my case this works. I don't need to change anything on a second export. In this topic I just wanted to express that I wonder why someone doesn't want that extra sharpness from bicubic resampling, but @walt.farrell is right that I personally equate quality with sharpness of an image, but this must not apply to everyone. Quote Windows 10 Pro x64 (1903). Intel Core i7-9700K @ 3.60GHz, 32 GB memory, NVidia RTX 2080 Affinity Photo 1.7.2.471, Affinity Designer 1.7.2.471, Affinity Publisher 1.7.2.471 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixx Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 2 hours ago, walt.farrell said: Wouldn't creating a new preset the care of that for you? Indeed it does. Seems that preset is sticky even though resampling method on its own is not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.