Ron Shutlar Posted January 2, 2019 Share Posted January 2, 2019 Hello Affinity Photo Would you please inform me how I can change the document size from Dots per inch to Pixels per inch, as there does not appear to be a drop down box to change this setting. I do not print from my own printer, but send my photographs to a professional printing company, so it is imperative that I change this setting to PPI. Thank you in anticipation Happy New Year Ron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staff MEB Posted January 2, 2019 Staff Share Posted January 2, 2019 Hi Ron Shutlar, Welcome to Affinity Forums The control you are looking for is the DPI setting (Dimensions section) when you create a new document in Affinity Photo (File ▸ New). If you want to change the DPI value after the document is created go to menu Document ▸ Resize Document.... There was quite a few discussions about the use of DPI instead of PPI in Affinity apps so please refer to this thread (and linked threads there) for additional information/discussion about the subject. Quote A Guide to Learning Affinity Software | Affinity Quick Reference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Shutlar Posted January 2, 2019 Author Share Posted January 2, 2019 Hello QA/Support I my opinion the DPI reference needs to be removed and PPI inserted instead. I agree with some of the users of Affinity Photo, it has no place within the software package. The sooner it is removed the better. No other photo editing software that I have used contains DPI. Regards Ron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toltec Posted January 2, 2019 Share Posted January 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Ron Shutlar said: Hello QA/Support I my opinion the DPI reference needs to be removed and PPI inserted instead. I agree with some of the users of Affinity Photo, it has no place within the software package. The sooner it is removed the better. No other photo editing software that I have used contains DPI. Regards Ron Why? Pixels Per Inch is total nonsense for a screen measurement and there are no pixels on paper, only dots. So why use a measurement that is so totally incorrect? All the other programs are wrong, why do something that is wrong just because everyone else does? Quote Windows PCs. Photo and Designer, latest non-beta versions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lepr Posted January 2, 2019 Share Posted January 2, 2019 . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lepr Posted January 2, 2019 Share Posted January 2, 2019 . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Shutlar Posted January 2, 2019 Author Share Posted January 2, 2019 Hello Affinity Photo The best way forward is for your company to consult with a Colour Management specialist who will then confirm the correct setting. Regards Ron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 2, 2019 Share Posted January 2, 2019 Ron is correct, the use of DPI for image pixel size is wrong, wrong, wrong! By incorrectly using DPI in APh only perpetuates the confusion.... Will it be changed? I doubt it .... Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R C-R Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 PPI only makes sense for measurements of physical devices like computer displays because only on them can you measure pixel spacing. Prints do not have pixels, just "dots" that have no direct 1:1 correspondence to document or display pixels, so there are no pixels to measure. Thus, it makes no sense to use PPI for print measurements, or anywhere else there is no clearly defined relationship between pixels & whatever it is you want to measure. Quote All 3 1.10.8, & all 3 V2.4.1 Mac apps; 2020 iMac 27"; 3.8GHz i7, Radeon Pro 5700, 32GB RAM; macOS 10.15.7 Affinity Photo 1.10.8; Affinity Designer 1.108; & all 3 V2 apps for iPad; 6th Generation iPad 32 GB; Apple Pencil; iPadOS 15.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R C-R Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 On 1/2/2019 Guest said: Ron is correct, the use of DPI for image pixel size is wrong, wrong, wrong! OK, but what would the right terminology be? There is no specific "pixel size" specified for the digital image metadata in every image file type -- pixels could be any size & they do not even have to have a square aspect ratio. Quote All 3 1.10.8, & all 3 V2.4.1 Mac apps; 2020 iMac 27"; 3.8GHz i7, Radeon Pro 5700, 32GB RAM; macOS 10.15.7 Affinity Photo 1.10.8; Affinity Designer 1.108; & all 3 V2 apps for iPad; 6th Generation iPad 32 GB; Apple Pencil; iPadOS 15.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Bruce Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 27 minutes ago, R C-R said: OK, but what would the right terminology be? There is no specific "pixel size" specified for the digital image metadata in every image file type -- pixels could be any size & they do not even have to have a square aspect ratio. That messed my mind up when I first came across it several years ago. But I got over it and don't worry about it. Software takes care of all that stuff behind the scenes. Maybe things per inch should be the new standard. tpi rules! Or when ever you see dpi just make your brain see ppi or vice versa. It is really really easy to do and it doesn't matter. PaulEC and R C-R 1 1 Quote Mac Pro (Late 2013) Mac OS 12.7.4 Affinity Designer 2.4.1 | Affinity Photo 2.4.1 | Affinity Publisher 2.4.1 | Beta versions as they appear. I have never mastered color management, period, so I cannot help with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
v_kyr Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 From Photo FAQs Answered With Tutorials: Quote Q: I really don’t understand DPI and Resolution, what the are the differences, which should I be changing? A: See Understanding DPI. They use it in a printing context sense, not for the display context where pixels still remain and are the essential measurement. Quote ☛ Affinity Designer 1.10.8 ◆ Affinity Photo 1.10.8 ◆ Affinity Publisher 1.10.8 ◆ OSX El Capitan ☛ Affinity V2.3 apps ◆ MacOS Sonoma 14.2 ◆ iPad OS 17.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R C-R Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Old Bruce said: Maybe things per inch should be the new standard. tpi rules! For that matter, why do we still use inches, when any linear unit types could be used? Then we could use "tput" or "tplut" as the generic term. But since we are really talking about resolution units, maybe it should be "tpru" or "tplru." Quote All 3 1.10.8, & all 3 V2.4.1 Mac apps; 2020 iMac 27"; 3.8GHz i7, Radeon Pro 5700, 32GB RAM; macOS 10.15.7 Affinity Photo 1.10.8; Affinity Designer 1.108; & all 3 V2 apps for iPad; 6th Generation iPad 32 GB; Apple Pencil; iPadOS 15.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeW Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, R C-R said: For that matter, why do we still use inches, when any linear unit types could be used? Then we could use "tput" or "tplut" as the generic term. But since we are really talking about resolution units, maybe it should be "tpru" or "tplru." And once again, only if one defines resolution in a manner to indicate physical pixel units would your post make some sort of sense. An image has only A pixels x B pixels. That's why it is pixels per inch. That it also has X Resolution, Y Resolution & Resolution Units is not material as those are simply metadata fields. But you can use millimeters instead of inch...at least if you can find an application that will write that unit into the appropriate fields (likely can be done using Image Magic). But then there may not be any applications that can utilize those fields for their math. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R C-R Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 2 hours ago, MikeW said: An image has only A pixels x B pixels. Exactly. The only 'universal' measurement unit is the number of pixels in each dimension of a digital image file. The rest of it is metadata that may or may not be included in the file, & even when it is it may be ignored by the software used to display, edit, or print it. And of course, depending on the format the file can include a mix of resolution-independent vector objects, multiple raster images with different pixel resolutions, multiple layers or the equivalent defined in several different ways, & text objects that may have no definite form defined within the file itself. Basically, the file is just a container for abstract virtual objects & data about them that can be manipulated in many different ways by software to create images. There is no one "this per that" metric that makes sense for all of them. Quote All 3 1.10.8, & all 3 V2.4.1 Mac apps; 2020 iMac 27"; 3.8GHz i7, Radeon Pro 5700, 32GB RAM; macOS 10.15.7 Affinity Photo 1.10.8; Affinity Designer 1.108; & all 3 V2 apps for iPad; 6th Generation iPad 32 GB; Apple Pencil; iPadOS 15.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firstdefence Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 Would it really be so bad to have both options displayed and changeable? DPI: PPI: After all, its only a bit of Math and it would kill this perennial argument dead. Quote iMac 27" 2019 Somona 14.3.1, iMac 27" Affinity Designer, Photo & Publisher V1 & V2, Adobe, Inkscape, Vectorstyler, Blender, C4D, Sketchup + more... XP-Pen Artist-22E, - iPad Pro 12.9 (Please refrain from licking the screen while using this forum) Affinity Help - Affinity Desktop Tutorials - Feedback - FAQ - most asked questions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 You can call them ‘sardines’ and ‘rainbows’, it doesn’t matter. It’s about communication and ensuring everyone understands the language. NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter failed because the wrong units were used - give a printing lab the wrong info and they don’t pick up the error you’ll crash and burn-up. PPI refers to the pixel resolution of a digital image, DPI refers to the density of ink dots on paper. The nuances of the terminology can be discussed ad infinitum but the bottom line is this is the industry standard. To suggest the terms are ‘interchangeable’ is incorrect and lazy. The developers should set a good example and use the correct terminology. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R C-R Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 On 1/3/2019 Guest said: PPI refers to the pixel resolution of a digital image ... Except that the pixel resolution of vector objects is indeterminate (because they are not defined in terms of pixels), the size of a pixel may be defined indirectly or not at all, & so on. "Pixel" is just a generic term for picture element, & like the generic term "dot" it refers to different things in different contexts. There is no way any multi-character shorthand term, regardless of what we might agree it stands for, can be "correct" in any meaningful sense in all those contexts. Quote All 3 1.10.8, & all 3 V2.4.1 Mac apps; 2020 iMac 27"; 3.8GHz i7, Radeon Pro 5700, 32GB RAM; macOS 10.15.7 Affinity Photo 1.10.8; Affinity Designer 1.108; & all 3 V2 apps for iPad; 6th Generation iPad 32 GB; Apple Pencil; iPadOS 15.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixx Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 6 hours ago, firstdefence said: Would it really be so bad to have both options displayed and changeable? Who cares what is the name. For ages professionals have used DPI and it is widely understood. When you are talking about digital pixel image everybody understand that DPI and PPI are used interchangeably. In scanning softwares Hamrick's Vuescan uses DPI, Lasersoft Silverfast uses PPI in user interface but user guides use DPI freely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R C-R Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 The two terms are used interchangeably because both of them are generic rather than specific, which makes them well suited for use in references to several different technologies, some of which have evolved over time to include things that did not exist when those terms were coined. The alternative is coining an ever growing number of different terms, each one specific to some clearly defined technical context. I don't think anybody really wants that, not even the most pedantic among us. Quote All 3 1.10.8, & all 3 V2.4.1 Mac apps; 2020 iMac 27"; 3.8GHz i7, Radeon Pro 5700, 32GB RAM; macOS 10.15.7 Affinity Photo 1.10.8; Affinity Designer 1.108; & all 3 V2 apps for iPad; 6th Generation iPad 32 GB; Apple Pencil; iPadOS 15.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lepr Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lepr Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 . MikeW 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R C-R Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, >|< said: Straw man. This thread has never been concerned with vector graphics. The opening post made the context clear: a digital image composed of pixels being provided to a printing service. Yes, a printing service that is extremely unlikely to require anything specified in terms of PPI rather than DPI. Quote All 3 1.10.8, & all 3 V2.4.1 Mac apps; 2020 iMac 27"; 3.8GHz i7, Radeon Pro 5700, 32GB RAM; macOS 10.15.7 Affinity Photo 1.10.8; Affinity Designer 1.108; & all 3 V2 apps for iPad; 6th Generation iPad 32 GB; Apple Pencil; iPadOS 15.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeW Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 R C-R, As regards an image, and only an image, if I were helping a user modify an image, what would I call these 4 things outlined in red? And if I wanted to communicate to that user about the number of pixels in an image, how would I express H/W of an image? Hint: And what term would I use to express who many of the things (from the first question) fit within an absolute measurement if that image is at 100% size? Sometimes a pixel is just a pixel. Patrick Connor 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R C-R Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 10 minutes ago, >|< said: You think wrong. Do you think there actually are any people who would be happy about having to contend with what could be a dozen or more different terms ... if they understood that is what it would take to make things "right"? Quote All 3 1.10.8, & all 3 V2.4.1 Mac apps; 2020 iMac 27"; 3.8GHz i7, Radeon Pro 5700, 32GB RAM; macOS 10.15.7 Affinity Photo 1.10.8; Affinity Designer 1.108; & all 3 V2 apps for iPad; 6th Generation iPad 32 GB; Apple Pencil; iPadOS 15.7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.