Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Slow develop speed


Recommended Posts

I have installed the new beta and ran a speed check, comparing it with the current version 1.6.5.135. I loaded a RAW (CR2 format) file of 27.5 Mb; the current version took 20 secs and the new beta 22 secs. I then immediately (without any processing) "developed" in each version - the "stable" version took 15 secs and the beta 1 min 22 secs, with almost all of that time without any sign of activity. I repeated the beta test with the same result. Saving the resulting jpeg in afphoto format and exporting as a jpeg gave virtually equal timings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mike21 said:

I have installed the new beta and ran a speed check, comparing it with the current version 1.6.5.135. I loaded a RAW (CR2 format) file of 27.5 Mb; the current version took 20 secs and the new beta 22 secs. I then immediately (without any processing) "developed" in each version - the "stable" version took 15 secs and the beta 1 min 22 secs, with almost all of that time without any sign of activity. I repeated the beta test with the same result. Saving the resulting jpeg in afphoto format and exporting as a jpeg gave virtually equal timings.

My open speed has improved for ORF files, but I have to agree the develop speed is slower.

Desktop: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, 32GB Ram, RTX 3070, LG 27" 4K 10Bit

Windows 11 22h2

Dell Laptop: i7 7700, 32GB Ram, GTX 1060, 16" 4K

Windows 10 22h2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the GPU you are using? You can check under Performance in the Preferences and then under Renderer.

Develop for me is still the same at 10-15 seconds but loading the RAW is about 2-4 seconds for 5D - Mk 2, Mk 3 and sR

Both PC’s Win 11 x64 System with Intuos Pen & Touch 
PC1 ASUS ROG Strix - AMD Ryzen 9 6900X CPU @ 3.3GHz. 32GB RAM

- GPU 1: AMD Radeon integrated. GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX 3060, 6GB
PC2 HP Pavilion - 
Intel® Core™ i7-7700HQ CPU @ 2.80GHz (8 CPUs), 16GB RAM
 - GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630, GPU 2: NVIDIA GTX1050, 4GB

iPad (8th Gen) 2020

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, AiDon said:

What is the GPU you are using? You can check under Performance in the Preferences and then under Renderer.

Develop for me is still the same at 10-15 seconds but loading the RAW is about 2-4 seconds for 5D - Mk 2, Mk 3 and sR

Windows doesn't utilise GPU for processing (yet). GPU only affects drawing to screen right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mark Ingram said:

GPU only affects drawing to screen right now.

Thanks for clarifying ...

Both PC’s Win 11 x64 System with Intuos Pen & Touch 
PC1 ASUS ROG Strix - AMD Ryzen 9 6900X CPU @ 3.3GHz. 32GB RAM

- GPU 1: AMD Radeon integrated. GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX 3060, 6GB
PC2 HP Pavilion - 
Intel® Core™ i7-7700HQ CPU @ 2.80GHz (8 CPUs), 16GB RAM
 - GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 630, GPU 2: NVIDIA GTX1050, 4GB

iPad (8th Gen) 2020

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Processing speed  on my CR2's has definitely increased, and the sliders are much smoother and speedier

Asus ROG Strix G17 Notebook:
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 3.80 GHz with Radeon Vega Graphics | 32GB DDR4 3200mHz RAM
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB Gfx | 2x 2TB SSD NVMe PCIe M.2 3x4 | Windows 11 Version 22H2 Build 22623.870

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My desktop computer is 7 years old. 4 Gb RAM, SSD, 2 core 3.2 GHz processor, 2 Gb video card. I have just tried again with the same CR2 file - time to load 27 seconds, time to develop 1.min 20 seconds, including 25 seconds before the develop moving bar appeared. With the non-beta version straight after, time to load was 23 seconds, time to develop 39 seconds, with the develop bar appearing immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.6.5.123
startup : 26s
Loading CR2 (18.2 MP) : 16s
Develop without adjustm : 28.7s

Beta 1.7.0.188
startup : 31.6s
Loading CR2 (18.2 MP) : 27.6s
Develop without adjustm :01.05.09 minutes

Camera: Canon EOS 700D
 

Affinity Photo  2.3.1

Laptop MSI Prestige PS42
Windows 11 Home 23H2 (Build 22631.3007) - Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8565U CPU @ 1.80GHz   2.00 GHz - RAM 16,0 GB

 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also observed the same problem with my CR2 files (18Mpx), but with my RAF files (24Mpx), it's better with the new 1.7.0.188. It's even faster than the Canon RAW files.

System : i5 6600 QuadCore 3.3GHz, Gigabyte Z170 HD3 DDR4, 32 Gb DDR Ballistix Sport LT, MSI Aero ITX GTX 1050Ti, Windows 10 Pro 64bits

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/26/2018 at 1:34 AM, HVDB Photography said:

1.6.5.123
startup : 26s
Loading CR2 (18.2 MP) : 16s
Develop without adjustm : 28.7s

Beta 1.7.0.188
startup : 31.6s
Loading CR2 (18.2 MP) : 27.6s
Develop without adjustm :01.05.09 minutes

Camera: Canon EOS 700D
 

Seeing this I decided to check and came up with this using a CR2 file(20.17MB) from my Canon EOS 70D

Stable 1.6.5.123

  • Program Load: 20.86 secs
  • Load CR2 file: 5.43 secs
  • Develop Adjusted File : 6.48 secs

Beta 1.7.0.188

  • Program Load: 17.20 secs
  • Load CR2 Adjusted File: 9.0 secs
  • Develop Adjusted File: 15.87 secs

These tests were run with my anti-virus, AVG (Free version) disabled since I always will disable it when post-processing.

I also tested with anti-virus enabled and there was only a one or two seconds difference.

 

Affinity Photo 2.4..; Affinity Designer 2.4..; Affinity Publisher 2.4..; Affinity2 Beta versions. Affinity Photo,Designer 1.10.6.1605 Win10 Home Version:21H2, Build: 19044.1766: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5820K CPU @ 3.30GHz, 3301 Mhz, 6 Core(s), 12 Logical Processor(s);32GB Ram, Nvidia GTX 3070, 3-Internal HDD (1 Crucial MX5000 1TB, 1-Crucial MX5000 500GB, 1-WD 1 TB), 4 External HDD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My computer has just been upgraded from 4 Gb RAM,  two core 3.2 GHz processor and an SSD to 8 Gb RAM and a quad core 2.83 processor - the most the motherboard will take (7 years old). Speeds are remarkably faster, Load time of a 27.5 Mb CR2 file (Canon 750 D) for ver 1.65 has dropped from 20 secs to 12 secs, and beta ver 1.7 from 22 secs to 12 secs. Time to develop for 1.65 has dropped from 15 secs to 9 secs and the beta version dropped massively from 1 min 20 secs to 9 secs. Times for other operations are generally slightly faster than previously for both versions, but they were quite quick anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.