Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Recommended Posts

  • Staff

Hey guys,

Enough about PPX9, let's not take this thread any further off topic.

Patrick Connor
Serif Europe Ltd

"There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man. True nobility lies in being superior to your previous self."  W. L. Sheldon

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Pyanepsion said:

Hello, Patrick of London.

It is unfortunate that Serif still has not finished some major functions of desktop publishing, but that does not justify going back to an antiquity such as PagePlus X9! That would fall from Charybdis into Scylla.

:)

Antiquities can be very peaceful places; and PagePlus X9 is a much, much calmer place to be than Charybdis.....

But let's hope Affinity Publisher is getting closer to reliable Footnote/Endnote capability than I suspect it actually is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

any news yet?

Base Unit: I5 (10th gen.), 6 cores, 12 threads, 24GB Ram, 256GB SSD (Boot), 1TB HDD, Intel 630 (Graphics), Colour Calibrated Monitor and Printer (Courtesy of X-Rite Hardware) - Running MacOS Monterey

Laptop: I5 (6th Gen), 8GB Ram, 128GB nvme, Intel 520 Graphics, Colour calibrated screen(Courtesy of X-Rite Hardware) - Running MacOS Monterey.

Server: i5 (4th Gen). 16GB Ram, nVidia GT 730 (Graphics), 500GB SSD (Boot), 2TB & 1TB HDD (General storage), Running MacOS Catalina
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can only add my name to the list of contributors requiring footnotes or endnotes - the latter being more important in my case. The book I am currently writing has in some cases, over 1,000 endnotes in a single chapter: imagine having to transpose these over. Sure, these will be reduced as some are being used to keep track of some incredibly intricate research, but I cannot hope to use Publisher (currently trying the trial version) unless this issue is addressed. I do think Affinity Publisher is a brilliant program and has many excellent features but without footnotes and endnotes, it's not a runner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Staff

@Peter Rennoldson & @Last Chance

Welcome to the Serif Affinity forums :) thanks for your contribution to this very popular feature request thread.

Patrick Connor
Serif Europe Ltd

"There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man. True nobility lies in being superior to your previous self."  W. L. Sheldon

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the invite, Patrick.

I would like to know the progress Serif is making towards adding this feature as it is just one of two points that are preventing me from purchasing the software.

The other is a proper import of Word DOCX documents. After imported one of the DOCX chapters to my book it managed to scramble some of the Paragraph and Text Styles, which would necessitate editing all the text and paragraph definitions. For example, somehow it decided to use the Times New Roman font, when my default is Zapf Humanist. 

Also, I can't work out why all my text frames have a grey background! Curious ...

One feature I am pleased to see is the Indexing - another crucial feature for me.

Please keep us informed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Staff

I really cannot say. Any progress on unreleased features is not only rarely mentioned, it is also not part of my role to do so. (though I have been known to hint in the days/weeks before something arrives but rarely longer)

As to errors inporting DOCX, those should be reported in the bugs forum for investigation (unless they relate to unsupported features like footnotes and endnotes ;) )

Patrick Connor
Serif Europe Ltd

"There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man. True nobility lies in being superior to your previous self."  W. L. Sheldon

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Last Chance said:

The other is a proper import of Word DOCX documents.

Hello, Last Chance.

:10_wink: Regardless of the desktop publishing software, it is not a good idea to directly import a Word file, because a a text software is to desktop publishing what is a fast food sandwich to haute cuisine . It's best to create the styles in Affinity Publisher, import all the plain text to Publisher, apply the Normal style, and then reset all styles using Word. This will save you a lot of trouble, especially at the printing press.

Regarding footnotes, end of chapter, end of part, end of book, it is actually a very big fault rather improbable in a software of such a quality.

6 cœurs, 12 processus - Windows 11 pro - 4K - DirectX 12 - Suite universelle Affinity (Affinity  Publisher, Affinity Designer, Affinity Photo).

Mais je vous le demande, peut-on imaginer une police sans sérifs ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Last Chance said:

Also, I can't work out why all my text frames have a grey background!

Check View > Studio > Text Frame and see if you applied a grey fill to the text frame.

But it’s always better to create a new thread in the dedicated Questions sections for such questions, as they may … and probably will … be overlooked in a thread like this. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Pyanepsion said:

Regardless of the desktop publishing software, it is not a good idea to directly import a Word file

The best option is RTF format.

All the latest releases of Designer, Photo and Publisher (retail and beta) on MacOS and Windows.
15” Dell Inspiron 7559 i7 Windows 10 x64 Pro Intel Core i7-6700HQ (3.50 GHz, 6M) 16 GB Dual Channel DDR3L 1600 MHz (8GBx2) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M 4 GB GDDR5 500 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD UHD (3840 x 2160) Truelife LED - Backlit Touch Display
32” LG 32UN650-W display 3840 x 2160 UHD, IPS, HDR10 Color Gamut: DCI-P3 95%, Color Calibrated 2 x HDMI, 1 x DisplayPort
13.3” MacBook Pro (2017) Ventura 13.6 Intel Core i7 (3.50 GHz Dual Core) 16 GB 2133 MHz LPDDR3 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 1536 MB 500 GB SSD Retina Display (3360 x 2100)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Petar Petrenko said:

The best option is RTF format.

Though Serif has said that their RTF importer is older than their .docx importer, and supports fewer features.

-- Walt
Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases
PC:
    Desktop:  Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 

    Laptop:  Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU.
iPad:  iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 17.4.1, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard 
Mac:  2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sonoma 14.4.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Pyanepsion said:

Hello, Last Chance.

:10_wink: Regardless of the desktop publishing software, it is not a good idea to directly import a Word file, ...

 

2 hours ago, Petar Petrenko said:

The best option is RTF format.

Well, to me, the best option is tagged text...

But if I didn't use applications that supported tagged text, I would use .docx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello, Taumatarea.

Be careful, pagination and footnotes are two different things. The difficulty of programming a footnote is the height of the footnote field, which will vary in height which encroaches on the body of the text, and the footnote must be on the other hand on the same page as the note call.

You will find on this tutorial how to insert a pagination.

https://affinity.serif.com/fr/tutorials/publisher/desktop/video/337266962

6 cœurs, 12 processus - Windows 11 pro - 4K - DirectX 12 - Suite universelle Affinity (Affinity  Publisher, Affinity Designer, Affinity Photo).

Mais je vous le demande, peut-on imaginer une police sans sérifs ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, the only reason it's "not a good idea" to import a DOCX is because Affinity Publisher does not quite handle it properly - yet. It's not bad, but some of the Styles do get screwed for some reason and apparently the developers are working on it. I learnt this after I sent an email to Serif, to which they replied promptly. But it still imports all the definitions and so can be edited and applied, so a lot easier than using RTF, which would lose all the definitions completely.

As a budget piece of software, though, I am amazed at what Affinity Publisher CAN do! Sure, it will never aspire to be as good as InDesign, which I currently use, but as a replacement it's very hard (impossible?) to beat on price and for this reason, I think I will drop that money pit (InDesign ~£240 per annum) and swap over.

By the time my next book is ready to publish, I'm hoping the footnotes & endnotes will be sorted as that is the only major feature I miss so far. :)

Edited by Last Chance
spelling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Last Chance said:

the only reason it's "not a good idea" to import a DOCX is because Affinity Publisher does not quite handle it properly

This is a point of view put forward by all manufacturers, because it gives the illusion of being able to transform a text document without effort. It's actually bad whether it's on Indesign, QuarkXPress, Affinity Publisher, etc. because:

1. Paragraph and character styles are of relatively poor quality in word processing software (Write, Page Word, etc. ), as these tools are not designed for printing press.
2. It is common for the word processing file not to be standardized, which often results in differences when using professional equipment.

I spend several hours improving the Word draft from the client's Word document, then paste the entire text into an ASCII editor and then use Word only as a template for preparing the styles of the DTP document.

9_9 It is obviously longer than a simple import, but it is very much worth it.

 

6 cœurs, 12 processus - Windows 11 pro - 4K - DirectX 12 - Suite universelle Affinity (Affinity  Publisher, Affinity Designer, Affinity Photo).

Mais je vous le demande, peut-on imaginer une police sans sérifs ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Pyanepsion said:
This is a point of view put forward by all manufacturers, because it gives the illusion of being able to transform a text document without effort. It's actually bad whether it's on Indesign, QuarkXPress, Affinity Publisher, etc. because:

1. Paragraph and character styles are of relatively poor quality in word processing software (Write, Page Word, etc. ), as these tools are not designed for printing press.
2. It is common for the word processing file not to be standardized, which often results in differences when using professional equipment.

I spend several hours improving the Word draft from the client's Word document, then paste the entire text into an ASCII editor and then use Word only as a template for preparing the styles of the DTP document.

9_9 It is obviously longer than a simple import, but it is very much worth it.

 

I think we'll have to "agree to disagree" here Pyanepsion :) My experience with importing Word DOCX files into InDesign has, on the whole, been very good with little, or no alterations necessary. Importing raw text files of even RTF just creates a lot of work, IMHO. As I said before, Affinity Publisher's handling of Word DOCX files is "OK" as at least all the paragraph and style definitions are included - it's just that the fonts, sizes etc. can (but not always) be altered, which is a simple matter of correcting the definitions.

Generally, this is much better for me when dealing with entire books. My current book is about 300,000 words and this will probably end up nearer 400,000 when completed. I'm not sure how large, or small, your client's documents are, but for a book this size having some of the work done is better than none at all ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pedrober said:

Without any doubt. Please request that feature...

Oh, I have.

One can search for the start tags or character tags using grep find/replace, replace with the p.style and c.style and remove the tags currently. But it takes more effort than it ought and doesn't always work properly. And, of course, creation of elements cannot work, so tagged text automation isn't possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am now well over halfway writing my Ph.D thesis. I use a lot of pictures and graphics and I've been waiting for Publisher in a state of exhilaration. I've been working tirelessly with Designer on iPad (I love working while lying on my bed) and now I'm beginning to take on some heavy duty work on Photo. But there is no way around it: I desperately need those footnotes/endnotes. I have fought with them in InDesign and while there is certainly room for improvement I will settle for something that works in a relatively reliable manner. My problem now is that I am running out of time because the University of Helsinki is breathing on my neck. I sincerely appreciate what you guys in Serif have created, especially Designer is pure joy to work with, but like many others I am also eagerly waiting for footnotes/endnotes so that I can create the best Ph.D thesis in the world.

Cheers

 

Jakke from Finland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.