Jump to content

How to duplicate (⌘J) transformation by fixed steps (not percentage)


Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

Let's say I would like to do this:

post-7538-0-65321800-1425457170_thumb.png

 

For the basic of this example: a 100px square that I want to reduce by exactly 10px on every duplicate. (100, 90, 80, 70, 60px, etc.)

I've done this manually, it was long enough. Imagine I've to built a texture like this with hundred of them?

 

The actual behavior of the duplicate function is in fact to apply -10% each time, which produce this (100, 90, 81, 72.9, 65.6px, etc. :

post-7538-0-86103700-1425457003_thumb.png

 

Am I missing something? Any idea?

Thanks your your help.

WebSite.pngTwitter.png500px.pngFlickr.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is important.  If the transform was done using a percentage, then the Power Duplicate should use a percentage.  But in this case when it's done using an absolute value the PD should continue using an absolute value.  Just as if the transform was done using a rotational angle it needs to continue using the rotational angle.  Which it does.

iMac (27-inch, Late 2009) with macOS Sierra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Tazintosh I would guess this is so it can be used to make spirals with a simple drag and drop.

 

How about putting in a feature request that asks that the offset used be determined by the form of the offset specified.  So that...

 

if an exact offset is entered from the transform panel (+=.75 or *=2) then that exact offset is used for each iteration.  

 

If a percentage is entered from the transform panel (+=75% or *=200%) then the percentage is used for each iteration.

 

If the copy is just dragged and dropped then that could use a percentage for each iteration.

 

Maybe that way we could have it as it has been design but it could handle both modes of use.

iMac (27-inch, Late 2009) with macOS Sierra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-10mm or px should act as an absolute property 

 

/1.1 should  resize relative to the last transformation 

 

 

IMO it does not make sense that the -10mm input is seen as a relative property and resized after every transformation ....

 

If i resize an object it could be a relative or absolute input. I would choose to leave it as a relative input.

 

Peace (y)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Staff

Currently there is no way to do this.  We have discussed possible improvements for the power duplicate function which we'll look into as soon as someone has the time to do it.

SerifLabs team - Affinity Developer
  • Software engineer  -  Photographer  -  Guitarist  -  Philosopher
  • iMac 27" Retina 5K (Late 2015), 4.0GHz i7, AMD Radeon R9 M395
  • MacBook (Early 2015), 1.3GHz Core M, Intel HD 5300
  • iPad Pro 10.5", 256GB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.