Jump to content
macerto

transparant object with stroke - don't show layer underneath

Recommended Posts

Not sure how to describe it, but let's say I create a circle with transparant background a black stroke. Then I create a text. The text intersects with the circle (see image)

How can I keep the circle surface transparant but not show the layer below, so that part of the first letter doesn't show (see image)

test.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you want it to be transparent if it's supposed to hide things behind it?


-- Walt

Windows 10 Home, version 2004 (19041.388),
   Desktop: 16GB memory, Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz, GeForce GTX 970
   Laptop:  8GB memory, Intel Core i7-3625QM @ 2.30GHz, Intel HD Graphics 4000 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Affinity Photo 1.9.1.979 and 1.9.1.979 Beta   / Affinity Designer 1.9.1.979 and 1.9.1.971 Beta  / Affinity Publisher 1.9.1.979 and 1.9.1.967 Beta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, macerto said:

let's say I create a circle with transparant background a black stroke.

It is not clear what you mean by this. By "transparent background" I assume you mean the circle has no fill but the "a black stroke" part is confusing because it looks like it has a cyan stroke in your image & the text below it does not show through.

I also don't understand what you mean about keeping the circle surface transparant but not showing the layer below, because if something is transparent it must show whatever is below it. That's what transparent means.


Affinity Photo 1.9.0, Affinity Designer 1.9.0, Affinity Publisher 1.9.0;  2020 iMac 27"; 3.8GHz i7, Radeon Pro 5700, 32GB RAM; macOS 10.15.7
Affinity Photo 
1.8.4.186 & Affinity Designer 1.8.4.4 for iPad; 6th Generation iPad 32 GB; Apple Pencil; iPadOS 14.0.1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is this what you want:

erase.png.cbeb4c63311b6053c1a25402cb63ccf8.png

 

this is how i did it

erase2.thumb.png.baf1b7cd52abb8ebd107a1bfb7cad393.png

 


intel core i5,  16GB 128Gb ssd win10 Pro Huion new 1060plus.

philips 272p 2560x1440px on intel HD2500 onboard graphics

Razer Tartarus Chroma

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the OP means like this.

533529135_ScreenShot2018-07-07at13_51_21.png.4e939dd7807518c02e25edc594bdc138.png

Peeka boo.afdesign (saved with history)


iMac 27" Late 2015 Fully Loaded, iMac 27" Mid 2011 both running High Sierra 10.13.6 - Affinity Designer/Photo & Publisher - Illustrator CC, Inkscape, Blender, Sketchup, Pepakura Designer, MTC, Pixelmator & Pixelmator Pro + more... XP-Pen Artist-22E, - iPad Pro 12.9 B|  

Affinity Help - Affinity Desktop Tutorials - Feedback - FAQ - most asked questions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the final output is to be raster, this can be done with just an Erase blend and an FX. And the text remains editable text. :)
The important part is to "group" the eraser object with the stuff that needs to be erased. That way the elements underneath (pink here) aren't touched.
(the eraser shape (ellipse here) needs a fill at 100% opacity for the erase to work....the FX is Outline)

197303360_ScreenShot2018-07-07at11_09_16AM.png.0e4b8a71ca332ba698e0082e01b95608.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd prefer not to rasterise it because I'd like to use this technique is for printing on shirts. That's the reason I don't want to fill the object with a color. I've attached an image that should help make it clear what my objective was.

You can see a small part of the green T inside the object. No part of the T should show up inside the outlined object. There are probably different way to achieve this.

Again, sorry for the confusing post :)
 

test.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case, convert the text to curves and edit the nodes on the T


intel core i5,  16GB 128Gb ssd win10 Pro Huion new 1060plus.

philips 272p 2560x1440px on intel HD2500 onboard graphics

Razer Tartarus Chroma

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, macerto said:

I'd prefer not to rasterise it because I'd like to use this technique is for printing on shirts.

Again, sorry for the confusing post :)
 

 

Cool. Not confusing at all :). If you want/need vectors stay with the boolean route as @firstdefence showed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please note the Annual Company Closure section in the Terms of Use. These are the Terms of Use you will be asked to agree to if you join the forum. | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.