the sky behind the moon

[zuperblue]

any help brining out the colours behind the moon,

i have 10 raw shots this is a PNG FILE

[Alfred]

Near duplicate of this thread about a TIFF variant of the same problem.

[firstdefence]

Reminds me of the TV series Space 1999 

[John Rostron]

Surely anything behind the moon, including the earth's shadow, is invisible. So its colour is immaterial.

John

[toltec]

19 minutes ago, John Rostron said:

Surely anything behind the moon, including the earth's shadow, is invisible. So its colour is immaterial.

John

 

As a thought, is it "invisible" ?

 

There is nothing there, it is space, empty, a void (etc)

 

So technically, it is not invisible, it is "missing" ?

 

Just a thought . Alfred ?

[Alfred]

33 minutes ago, toltec said:

So technically, it is not invisible, it is "missing" ?

 

Just a thought . Alfred ?

 

“Invisible” literally means neither more nor less than “unable to be seen”. It doesn’t matter whether an object’s invisibility is caused by its being hidden or by its being completely missing.

[dutchshader]

41 minutes ago, toltec said:

 

There is nothing there, it is space, empty, a void (etc)

 

there is dark matter and dark energy, not totaly empty

[toltec]

11 minutes ago, Alfred said:

 

“Invisible” literally means neither more nor less than “unable to be seen”. It doesn’t matter whether an object’s invisibility is caused by its being hidden or by its being completely missing.

 

So technically, the money in my bank account is merely invisible, not missing. That's good news 

[Alfred]

10 minutes ago, toltec said:

 

So technically, the money in my bank account is merely invisible, not missing. That's good news 

 

LOL. I think you mean the money not in your bank account!

 

I hate to break this to you, but you’ve got it the wrong way around: if it were hidden it would be merely invisible, but if it’s missing then it’s missing (and invisible, too). If it were missing because someone threw it into a lake I suppose it could be described as “merely” invisible, but I’m playing with words now.

[firstdefence]

1 hour ago, Alfred said:

 

LOL. I think you mean the money not in your bank account!

 

I hate to break this to you, but you’ve got it the wrong way around: if it were hidden it would be merely invisible, but if it’s missing then it’s missing (and invisible, too). If it were missing because someone threw it into a lake I suppose it could be described as “merely” invisible, but I’m playing with words now.

and strangely enough lakes have banks 

 

Also, do you mean invisible to the naked eye; not that I've ever seen a clothed one but one is assuming invisibility from the human perspective and with our rather stunted range of vision.

[Alfred]

23 minutes ago, firstdefence said:

and strangely enough lakes have banks 

 

Also, do you mean invisible to the naked eye; not that I've ever seen a clothed one but one is assuming invisibility from the human perspective and with our rather stunted range of vision.

 

LOL again. Yes, I think we have to assume invisibility from the human perspective.

 

[IanSG]

How did you take / process that picture?  The black background is pure black and the stars are individual pixels!  Even the unlit part of the Moon, which should have some Earthshine, is showing mostly pure black.