ms.fuentecilla Posted February 23, 2018 Posted February 23, 2018 There seems to be some over compensation in Vertical panoramas emphasising curvature. The strange treatment of sunbursts has already been noted and you await information from me. Rick G 1
harrym Posted February 24, 2018 Posted February 24, 2018 I think hemi would sort that pretty quickly and for course the mesh tool if you want to do it manually. I've had a couple of panos like that as well and have come to the conclusion that that's what is required for best point alignment which is the most important thing, correcting the geometry being an acceptable trade off. Regards PaulAffinity 1
PaulAffinity Posted February 25, 2018 Posted February 25, 2018 I adore AP.... But use MS ICE, free, which is the best IMHO..... Paul
ms.fuentecilla Posted February 25, 2018 Author Posted February 25, 2018 No complaint intended just an observation. The distortion can also be corrected via 'lens' in develop if it has to occur in the first place. The mesh tool creates its own problems. But what is 'hemi'? What is IMHO?
Alfred Posted February 25, 2018 Posted February 25, 2018 1 hour ago, ms.fuentecilla said: But what is 'hemi'? Fisheye-Hemi plug-in from Imadio. 1 hour ago, ms.fuentecilla said: What is IMHO? IMHO = 'In My Humble Opinion'. (You may also come across IMNSHO = 'In My Not So Humble Opinion'!) PaulAffinity 1 Alfred Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for Windows • Windows 10 Home/Pro Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for iPad • iPadOS 17.5.1 (iPad 7th gen)
harrym Posted February 27, 2018 Posted February 27, 2018 On 25/02/2018 at 2:46 PM, ms.fuentecilla said: No complaint intended just an observation. The distortion can also be corrected via 'lens' in develop if it has to occur in the first place. The mesh tool creates its own problems. But what is 'hemi'? What is IMHO? Can lens correction correct this? It's a stitched pano When I run my RAW files through DxO lens correction is applied, doesn't change the stitch results other than more accurate point alignment (I believe/hope!) @Alfred thanks, I really must remember to add links when I just throw something like that in! ( should I reference DxO ? ) Regards
ms.fuentecilla Posted February 27, 2018 Author Posted February 27, 2018 Lens correction I played with did make adjustments to the final developed result straightening the sea horizon but there was distortion in that the upper part was compressed, so altering the perspective diminishing the mountain. No lens correction was needed for the original frames in both of which the sea was horizontal.
Alfred Posted February 27, 2018 Posted February 27, 2018 23 minutes ago, harrym said: ( should I reference DxO ? ) I don't see why not, Harry! Lots of our fellow users do, and unless you're a DxO employee it can hardly be construed as advertising. PaulAffinity 1 Alfred Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for Windows • Windows 10 Home/Pro Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for iPad • iPadOS 17.5.1 (iPad 7th gen)
ms.fuentecilla Posted March 1, 2018 Author Posted March 1, 2018 I thought you might be interested to see this fantastic cyclonic result from a 3 frame vertical panorama Mark Ingram 1
Alfred Posted March 1, 2018 Posted March 1, 2018 4 minutes ago, ms.fuentecilla said: I thought you might be interested to see this fantastic cyclonic result from a 3 frame vertical panorama That looks amazing, but I suspect it isn't quite what you were aiming for! Alfred Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for Windows • Windows 10 Home/Pro Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for iPad • iPadOS 17.5.1 (iPad 7th gen)
ms.fuentecilla Posted March 2, 2018 Author Posted March 2, 2018 Well ... er ... not quite. The clouds were almost vertically oriented! Do you think inpainting might help?!!!
harrym Posted March 3, 2018 Posted March 3, 2018 WOW that's just plain mental! Care to share the original RAWS? Wonder if this is a focal length issue, which end of 16-70 are you using? When I do panos I'm always at least 50mm (FF equiv) Regards
ms.fuentecilla Posted March 6, 2018 Author Posted March 6, 2018 Sharing becomes possible perhaps when I am out of Spain. In rural Spain bandwidth is not brilliant. Wider end used probably around 20. This is not shown in the AP data. I have many other successful panoramas even fro 16mm, so this was a surprise.
ms.fuentecilla Posted March 8, 2018 Author Posted March 8, 2018 At one stage in this you asked me to send the originals of the Feb 23rd post via Dropbox but it proved not possible at that time. It should now be possible if you would still want them as I now have a fast connection from Holland. They would be ARW files and therefore large. Please let me know. Sorry this is an incorrect response. The correct one has been sent to a request from Feb 16th.
ms.fuentecilla Posted March 8, 2018 Author Posted March 8, 2018 This was an experiment on my part so the originals have little pictorial merit but hopefully they will now upload with a proper internet speed. Enjoy testing! DSC04255.ARW DSC04256.ARW DSC04257.ARW DSC04258.ARW
Julius1de Posted March 8, 2018 Posted March 8, 2018 3 hours ago, ms.fuentecilla said: This was an experiment on my part so the originals have little pictorial merit but hopefully they will now upload with a proper internet speed. Enjoy testing! DSC04255.ARW DSC04256.ARW DSC04257.ARW DSC04258.ARW My resultPicture 04255 + 04256 - Save Pano as TIFPicture 04257 + 04258 - Save Pano as TIF, thenTif 1 + TIF 2 as Pano DSC04255-04258_Pano.tiff Win7 HP 64 Bit, AMD Six-core 3.50 GHz, 16 GB Ram, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
ms.fuentecilla Posted March 10, 2018 Author Posted March 10, 2018 That looks about right Julius. Ingenious. The TIFF route seems to rescue several difficulties in the panorama tool. I do wonder if the Sony ARW code is problematical.
Recommended Posts