Jump to content

Call for Camera Images

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

As part of some upcoming development work, we would like to test our software with a huge variation of camera images, and we’re hoping that some of you may be able to contribute to these efforts. We w

Would Be Nice If Affinity Photo Could Do Correction and Create Profiles From A McBeth ,ColorChecker® Digital SG,Datacolor SpyderCheckr SCK100 

Hi Mark, could you be a little bit more specific with regards to the required picture type/content? Do you prefere highISO pics, special lighting situations? ... or would any RAW crap that will be chu

Misread 2018 as 2019 so uploaded a Canon 5D Mk iii R+J shooting session. Hope you still can use them. Hopefully, the ability to edit RAW out of Apple Photos will come from this in addition to whatever is in the works.

https://bmb.photos | https://vocallength.com | https://khonsuapp.com Focus: The unexpected, the abstract, the extreme on screen, paper, & other physical outputTools: macOS (Primary: Mojave, MBP2018), Canon (Primary: 5D3), iPhone (Primary: X), Epson

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be nice if this could be supported....

A high resolution RAW image from a Lumix G9 (P1000711.RW2) was just added to the drop-box.

The Raw Developer tool currently does not recognize this file type and displays it as scattered pixels.  



Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Sigma 1:1:1 camera files posted (very different from the SD Quattro above).

SD14 colour full resolution

SD1M: colour med resolution, B/W med resolution, colour full resolution. If more lens data are needed, I can provide more samples.

The Medium resolution images use CMOS binning for better S/N ratio. The B/W should behave like a Leica Monochrome.

Zero demosaicing to be used, zero sharpening to be used, and if properly exposed, next to zero noise removal to be used. Should look excellent even at 200%, without moire or artifcacts.

Impressive feature list!


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...


I have sent RAW NRW and JPG from  Nikon Coolpix P1000 not included in the current production release of Affinity Photo. I think the RAW as loaded without any adjustment could be improved in that the JPEG from the camera shows better contrast and less tendency to be overexposed in the peak white area. I didn't use the D-lighting processing in the camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like Canon CR3 files can be a bit delicate, so this may also be something worth testing for if for example you're planning on allowing the file to be modified (such as allowing the 'Date Taken' field to be modified).


CORRUPTION WARNING: Patched problem where Canon DPP would destroy a CR3 image if the file had previously been edited by DPP then Exiftool
(If you have edited any CR3 images with ExifTool that had been previously edited by DPP, then re-edit with ExifTool 11.45 or later to restructure the file so DPP doesn't destroy it if used to edit the file later)


Link to post
Share on other sites


I have just joined the forum. I have in my database over 600k photos (RAW & JPG) from over 120 cameras in combination with 138 lenses (this includes older cameras and mobile phones as the current database starts in 2010). It's a wide range of subjects and shooting conditions. If you still need samples, I can try to upload (or share via Dropbox/OneDrive) a selection but I need some guidance on what is mostly needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
On 3/9/2019 at 9:22 PM, jmapdg said:

I sent photos from Nikon D7000 


  • "The user interface is supposed to work for me - I am not supposed to work for the user interface."
  • Computer-, operating system- and software agnostic; I am a result oriented professional. Look for a fanboy somewhere else.
  • “When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger.” ― Confucius
  • Not an Affinity user og forum user anymore. The software continued to disappoint and not deliver.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Don't know if it is still needed, but I uploaded a set of photos today.

Mostly from my M50 with different settings (C-RAW, RAW) and different lenses.

And also from most of the other gears (cameras+phones) used for the photos in my collection.

Most are without persons and faces.

If it is for the DAM prepared, these can still be useful.



Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...

Important Information

Please note there is currently a delay in replying to some post. See pinned thread in the Questions forum. These are the Terms of Use you will be asked to agree to if you join the forum. | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.