Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

DAMn, where is it?


Recommended Posts

Just kidding, but any news on DAM, specifically within the iOS app? Right now it (along with non-destructive RAW edits) is pretty much the only thing holding me back from going full iOS all the time for my retouching. I currently still use Capture One to sync my RAW changes across multiple images where necessary.

iPad Pro 12.9 M1/Mac Mini M1, in that order

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same for me! In my opinion there is no need for affinity to do this on their own. Why not just cooperate with qnap or synology? This could give us plenty of storage as well as fast backups of and syncing between our devices. Additionally there are no privacy issues. Come on guys, how hard can it be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Chrisb89 said:

Same for me! In my opinion there is no need for affinity to do this on their own. Why not just cooperate with qnap or synology? This could give us plenty of storage as well as fast backups of and syncing between our devices. Additionally there are no privacy issues. Come on guys, how hard can it be?

I think we're talking about 2 different things. Yes, they're both DAM, but you're speaking from an external perspective, where I'm speaking of the app having the functionality, whether the storage be external or local.

iPad Pro 12.9 M1/Mac Mini M1, in that order

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure, but what I mean should be both, easier to develop and more flexible to use.

 

Just imagine you could shoot somewhere in the field, pull all the photos onto your iPad, give star ratings to identify the best ones, (perhaps even start with some basic editing), continue to work on your desktop, backup everything on your NAS and eventually show the best photographs to your clients or friends on the iPad again.

 

I‘d love such a workflow, but even though Adobe made some progress towards it, they force us to sync everything through the cloud. Having raw files with 30mb per photo as well as a poor internet connection, their approach does not work. Why is there no innovative company to consider such an easy but effective workflow?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.