farbenfeuer Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Hello all, in direct comparison i noticed, that images that are resized in PS are looking way better especially in terms of sharpness than in AP or AD. Can anybody confirm this, or am i just doing somethin wrong here? i know this has to do with interpolation but i used "bilinear" for both to make it fair. Regards Tim Quote iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, 2017), 4,2 GHz Intel Core i7, 64 GB 2400 MHz DDR4, Radeon Pro 580 8192 MB, ROG PG348Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaffeeundsalz Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Hi Tim, while the bilinear setting may surely work differently in Photoshop and Affinity, the interpolation method is actually key for what you want to achieve here. In other words, if you want a sharper result when resizing, simply don't use Affinity's bilinear setting and try Lanczos 3 instead. I personally prefer the "separable" option, but of course it depends on the actual image and "non-separable" will give you the sharpest result possible. Hope this helps. Cheers kaffeeundsalz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farbenfeuer Posted January 12, 2017 Author Share Posted January 12, 2017 Hmn, yea i know theres a huge difference in the interpolation methods, but i was directly comparing the bilinears just for testing. Lanczos seems better on first glance, but with PS method on auto it still has slightly more contrast/sharpness.Well i guess its just how it is. Can't expect the newcomer to beat the long time "champion" in every aspect now can you. ;) Quote iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, 2017), 4,2 GHz Intel Core i7, 64 GB 2400 MHz DDR4, Radeon Pro 580 8192 MB, ROG PG348Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.