Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A document that opens with correct formatting in Publisher 2.6.2 in Windows 11 Pro desktop has greatly increased text line spacing when opened in Publisher 2.6.3 and 2.6.3.3322. The problem affects some, but not all of the styles used in the document.

 

Randy Wright

2.6.2.png

2.6.3.3322.png

Collins B 250515 interior.afpub

Posted

Hi @wrandyr,

I think there are a couple of things going on here...

  • It looks as though the original InDesign LuLu template has been changed from 72 dpi to 600 dpi...
     
  • The text frames on the I-Introduction and P-Pagination Master pages have been scaled, indicated by the solid blue scale handles at the bottom right of the respective text frames...

    This fits in with the dpi change because when the text frame scaling is reset, the 12 pt text appears as 1.4 pt

    ((600 - 72) / 72) x 100 = 733.34% | 1.4 pt + 733.34% = 12 pt
     
  • The document itself doesn't have Baseline Grid enabled, yet the OHAP Introduction and OHAP Interview Body Text Styles both have Align to Baseline Grid enabled
     
  • The TOC 1: CHAP Heading (bold centered for ToC) Text Style, which is based on the TOC 1: Entry Text Style, also has Baseline Grid enabled
     
  • The ToC Text Frame on Page 7 has Use Independent Baseline Grid enabled with the Grid Spacing set to 130 pt

I suspect the change in line spacing is related to one or more of the above, though I'm unaware of any significant changes between 2.6.2 and 2.6.3.

Unticking Align to Baseline Grid for the OHAP Introduction, OHAP Interview Body and TOC 1: Entry Text Styles will correct the line spacing across the document, but I think the text frame scaling on the I-Introduction and P-Pagination Master pages should be addressed to avoid potential problems further down the road and the associated Text Styles re-applied accordingly.

I don't have 2.6.2 installed, so I can't compare and contrast, but does the document literally open correctly in 2.6.2 but with the increased line spacing in 2.6.3 without any additional changes being made to the file?

Affinity Designer 2.6.3 | Affinity Photo 2.6.3 | Affinity Publisher 2.6.3
MacBook Pro M3 Max, 36 GB Unified Memory, macOS Sonoma 14.6.1, Magic Mouse
HP ENVY x360, 8 GB RAM, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, Windows 10 Home, Logitech Mouse

Posted

Hi Hangman,

We have been here before:

https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/topic/182864-table-of-contents-update-messes-up-the-layout-in-publisher-v1-and-v2-workarounds/#comment-1156972

Quote

I don't have 2.6.2 installed, so I can't compare and contrast, but does the document literally open correctly in 2.6.2 but with the increased line spacing in 2.6.3 without any additional changes being made to the file?

Yes, exactly. I would think I had applied the changes to the template, but in case I had not, I opened the file we fixed in our earlier conversation in 6.2.3 and it exhibits the same behavior: OK in 2.6.2 and broken in 2.6.3.

Posted

I am still working on it, but eliminating the scaling in the master pages seems to be resolving the issue. I didn't know about the text box scaling indicator, so I will go through the document and purge all of those instances. Thank you for your help.

Posted
19 hours ago, wrandyr said:

Yes, exactly. I would think I had applied the changes to the template, but in case I had not, I opened the file we fixed in our earlier conversation in 6.2.3 and it exhibits the same behavior: OK in 2.6.2 and broken in 2.6.3.

That has sometimes happened in the past due to the earlier release(s) exhibiting a bug in how they interpret something, and thus when the bug is fixed the new release displays the data differently. That situation is difficult for us as users to diagnose, given that we don't know all the bug fixes and the details of what code is likely to be involved.

-- Walt
Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases
PC:
    Desktop:  Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 

    Laptop:  Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU.
    Laptop 2: Windows 11 Pro 24H2,  16GB memory, Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E80100 - Qualcomm(R) Oryon(TM) 12 Core CPU 4.01 GHz, Qualcomm(R) Adreno(TM) X1-85 GPU
iPad:  iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 18.5, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard 
Mac:  2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sequoia 15.5

Posted
On 5/18/2025 at 3:42 AM, walt.farrell said:

That has sometimes happened in the past due to the earlier release(s) exhibiting a bug in how they interpret something, and thus when the bug is fixed the new release displays the data differently. That situation is difficult for us as users to diagnose, given that we don't know all the bug fixes and the details of what code is likely to be involved.

Particularly difficult when it breaks templates and legacy documents, and there does not seem to be any way to revert the earlier version once an update is installed. I was fortunate in that I had not updated all of my machines so I could make comparisons.

In my case the repairs involved:

  • Removing the scaling from master page text frames.
  • Reapplying text styles and clearing character styles in the master page text frames.
  • Reapplying text styles and clearing character styles in the document text. Fortunately, this could be done by searching and replacing with the same style.
  • While the update affected the font sizes, it did not change the paragraph decorations, which then became too large, so a reciprocal rescaling had to be applied. Also a negative decoration indent became positive, but not rescaled.

I'm lucky that I am not subject to deadlines. Thanks again to @Hangman for putting me on the right track.

Posted
8 minutes ago, wrandyr said:

Particularly difficult when it breaks templates and legacy documents, and there does not seem to be any way to revert the earlier version once an update is installed. I was fortunate in that I had not updated all of my machines so I could make comparisons.

One thing I have subsequently discovered in 2.6.3 is that Independent Baseline Grids are not scaled correctly if the document itself is rescaled, e.g., from say A4 to A5, which likely explains why the ToC Text Frame on Page 7 had an Independent Baseline Grid set with 130 pt Grid Spacing.

Affinity Designer 2.6.3 | Affinity Photo 2.6.3 | Affinity Publisher 2.6.3
MacBook Pro M3 Max, 36 GB Unified Memory, macOS Sonoma 14.6.1, Magic Mouse
HP ENVY x360, 8 GB RAM, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, Windows 10 Home, Logitech Mouse

Posted
10 minutes ago, wrandyr said:

and there does not seem to be any way to revert the earlier version once an update is installed.

As long as you're not on an iPad, you can install older releases of the retail versions and also of the beta versions if you've downloaded and saved the installers.

-- Walt
Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases
PC:
    Desktop:  Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 

    Laptop:  Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU.
    Laptop 2: Windows 11 Pro 24H2,  16GB memory, Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E80100 - Qualcomm(R) Oryon(TM) 12 Core CPU 4.01 GHz, Qualcomm(R) Adreno(TM) X1-85 GPU
iPad:  iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 18.5, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard 
Mac:  2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sequoia 15.5

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.