Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We have different export format in Publisher but not .idml. I suugest to include that format, if we could open it whisch is fantastic, why not export for InDesign users. It is practical in some colaboration work.

Posted
On 4/17/2025 at 4:52 PM, Iztok said:

We have different export format in Publisher but not .idml. I suugest to include that format, if we could open it whisch is fantastic, why not export for InDesign users. It is practical in some colaboration work.

IMO they will have first to complete .IDML import for the features they have in common.

All the latest releases of Designer, Photo and Publisher (retail and beta) on MacOS and Windows.
13.3” MacBook Pro (2017) Ventura 13.6 Intel Core i7 (3.50 GHz Dual Core) 16 GB 2133 MHz LPDDR3 Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 1536 MB 500 GB SSD Retina Display (3360 x 2100)

15” Dell Inspiron 7559 i7 Windows 10 x64 Pro Intel Core i7-6700HQ (3.50 GHz, 6M) 16 GB Dual Channel DDR3L 1600 MHz (8GBx2) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M 4 GB GDDR5 500 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD UHD (3840 x 2160) Truelife LED - Backlit Touch Display
32” LG 32UN650-W display 3840 x 2160 UHD, IPS, HDR10 Color Gamut: DCI-P3 95%, Color Calibrated 2 x HDMI, 1 x DisplayPort

Posted
On 4/17/2025 at 10:52 AM, Iztok said:

It is practical in some colaboration work.

Probably not as much as you might be inclined to think.  Trying to round-trip between different page layout applications is likely to cause headaches, even with common file formats, due to fundamental differences in how the different programs handle various cases.

This has been discussed before.  IDML is more useful for a one-time transfer of a document from one publishing system to another, or for processing through various external specialized utilities, and yes, IDML export would be VERY nice to have (as I myself also pointed out back when IDML import was first introduced - this thread is actually a duplicate, or possibly more?  this has come up before...), but trying to use it in a collaborative workflow with differing applications is likely to be less than satisfactory.

It would be nice to have the option to try, as well as being nice to have for other reasons, but please do keep your expectations in check as to how practical it would actually be to use it that way.

Posted

There are no arguments against implementing IDML export, which, beyond its workflow potential, should be introduced to allow users to export their data and gain full ownership in a format suited to the purpose. And don’t even mention PDF.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.