nickbatz Posted January 13 Posted January 13 Affinity Photo Mac. Just checking to make sure I'm not committing a double-profiling crime. I never used to trust the soft proofing in Affinity Photo, but either it or the ICC profile I'm using now * is better. * Canson's profile for their fantastic Arches 88 paper Quote
thomaso Posted January 14 Posted January 14 2 hours ago, nickbatz said: Soft proof adj layers aren't part of export, right? Yes. – Note, they offer printer profiles, too. https://www.canson-infinity.com/en/icc-profiles And note Dan C's info: Affinity soft proof does not simulate paper colour: (while the Arches 88 seems to be 'neutral white' this might not matter) On 5/16/2022 at 4:47 PM, Dan C said: On 5/13/2022 at 4:04 PM, thomaso said: Finally the support recommended not to use Affinity for softproofing because of the missing option "Simulate paper color". I can confirm that this is already logged as an improvement with our developers, so I'll be adding a few additional 'votes' to this now. Quote macOS 10.14.6 | MacBookPro Retina 15" | Eizo 27" | Affinity V1
nickbatz Posted January 14 Author Posted January 14 14 minutes ago, thomaso said: Yes. – Note, they offer printer profiles, too. https://www.canson-infinity.com/en/icc-profiles And note Dan C's info: Affinity soft proof does not simulate paper colour: (while the Arches 88 seems to be 'neutral white' this might not matter) Thanks. The ICC profile is for the paper and printer combination (Canon Pro-1000 and Pro-4100, which is the same printer only larger). And yeah, the paper color... well, I get in arguments with photographers all the time who tell me I'm a not a real man unless I run out and buy a $3000 monitor that shows 100% Adobe RGB and a colorimeter and the right lighting... None of that matters much for what I do, being an artist who works with photographic shapes and textures (mostly) rather than a photographer trying to match skin tones, etc. exactly without making proof prints. I only need to get a decent preview of how the proof print is going to look so I can start with reasonable "mastering" adjustments to the brightness, saturation, maybe some of the colors, etc. Most of the time I make multiple proof prints along the way anyway. But I don't want to apply the ICC profile twice. Quote
lepr Posted January 14 Posted January 14 11 hours ago, nickbatz said: Soft proof adj layers aren't part of export, right? Unlike a soft proof viewing mode found in many apps, Affinity's Soft Proof Adjustment operates like the other Adjustments in that it will affect the colours that are exported unless you switch off its visibility. R C-R 1 Quote
walt.farrell Posted January 14 Posted January 14 10 hours ago, nickbatz said: But I don't want to apply the ICC profile twice. Then you'll need to disable (hide) the Soft Proof Adjustment layer before you Export. R C-R 1 Quote -- Walt Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases PC: Desktop: Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Laptop: Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU. Laptop 2: Windows 11 Pro 24H2, 16GB memory, Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E80100 - Qualcomm(R) Oryon(TM) 12 Core CPU 4.01 GHz, Qualcomm(R) Adreno(TM) X1-85 GPU iPad: iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 18.3.1, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard Mac: 2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sequoia 15.0.1
nickbatz Posted January 14 Author Posted January 14 So they are included in the export. Okay, thanks, I'll turn them off. However, thinking about this, it probably wouldn't make a difference if you apply the same profile twice. The first time would have done the translation already, so the second one wouldn't have anything to do. I think, right? Quote
lepr Posted January 14 Posted January 14 34 minutes ago, nickbatz said: However, thinking about this, it probably wouldn't make a difference if you apply the same profile twice. The first time would have done the translation already, so the second one wouldn't have anything to do. I think, right? No. Imagine for simplicity's sake a profile that shifts all hues by 10 degrees. Apply that once and the shift is 10 degrees, apply it again and there is a further shift by 10 degrees, giving a resulting shift of 20 degrees. walt.farrell and nickbatz 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.