Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Staff
Posted

An issue raised in this thread ("Smudge Brush Tool is too strong vs implementaion in 2.5") has now been reported to the developers by the testing team (Ref: AF-6387). Thank you very much for reporting this issue to us.

Posted

@JaneV @Chris B Just wondering, are you certain your brush settings were exactly the same as in 2.5? I only ask as I've also rolled back to 2.5.7 because of this and a few other bugs and when I installed the new 2.6.2 Beta 3213 I noticed the settings of my favourite smudge brush had changed a little. When I modified them to match the ones in 2.5.7 I'm getting the same results in both. By my estimation and experimentation, this Beta has fixed the anomaly I was experiencing, i.e. forced spacing and too much 'strength', and returned my brush to its previous expected behaviour.

For those folk wanting a stronger smudge as 2.6.0 introduced, they can do so by modifying their settings, namely spacing and strength.

Note, I'm using a drawing display with stylus as my input device.

Below is a comparison of the exact same brush settings in 2.5.7 and Beta 2.6.2 (3213).

2.5.7:

262 (3213):  

Unfortunately, I have found a bug (that was briefly mentioned by @paolo.limoncelli earlier) in that if I use a mouse as my input device then the smudge brush seems to sample and stamp colour (or transparency in transparent areas) when single-clicking with the mouse. Note, however, if the mouse button is held in and the brush is dragged then the colour does not transfer. This single-click behaviour doesn't occur with my drawing display and stylus. See video using the mouse below:

 

 

 

Posted

Yes the settings were the really the same, as I use the brush often I am clear of its difference and it's lack of ability to achieve what I need with the new version;  one of the staff has recreated what I did and confirmed they had the same result and has logged the problem.

Posted

No worries @JaneV. I thought it might pay to check. As you can see, my experience (with a round soft brush) is the equal opposite of yours. As demonstrated, my exact same settings behave in exactly the same way. Perhaps there might be an issue with specific brushes when used as the Smudge tool? This has been raised already.

I'd be interested to know how @Chris B was able to confirm your experience when you didn't provide details of the brush you used, whether you're using a mouse or stylus, your OS, hardware acceleration settings etc. and so how he was able to replicate your anomaly and able to provide the developers details. Perhaps there is something other users - like myself - aren't investigating in relation to systems and/or settings. Maybe someone else will chime in with their findings and shed light on the matter.

As noted in my other posts re the Smudge Tool, my system is:

2019 i9 MacBook Pro 16" with AMD 5600M and Ventura 13.7.4 with Hardware acceleration ON. XP Pen Artist 24 QHD as input device.

Posted

I can confirm that those bugs look gone so far...

 

 

Regarding the strongness it seems to be working correctly now, in a way comparable to other software. To be fair, it always felt rather soft in previous releases…

So I wonder if the artifacts, combined with the "erasing" effect, were also a result of its legacy behavior.

But I do not use it for photo retouching...

DAUB® Brushes making tools for artists, illustrators and doodlers

Posted

That's great to read your original artefact bugs have also been fixed. Regarding the tool as it is now, I'm able to achieve a wide range of smudge strength and nuance with the various settings now the edit panel bugs have been resolved. Hopefully there's nothing I've overlooked in my testing.

I've made a new bug report for the small issue I noted in my post above (the 3rd video in the post with three video examples).

 

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.