wintermute Posted November 20, 2024 Posted November 20, 2024 Almost the same file. One is embedded *.afphoto file, the other is the same *.afphoto file duplicated and rasterized. But the masking effect is completely different. Is this the behavior you expect from a very deeply integrated software package? (embedded *.afphoto clips pixel layer to border not to alpha) Quote
wintermute Posted November 20, 2024 Author Posted November 20, 2024 14 minutes ago, Return said: If you roast a coffee bean and put hot water on, it tastes like coffee ,right? If you don't roast the bean and put hot water on it it tastes bitter and like S**T. Both are still coffee beans and you did something with it or not but you expect the same outcome ,why? mayby beacuse alpha is an aplha? Quote
NotMyFault Posted November 20, 2024 Posted November 20, 2024 40 minutes ago, wintermute said: Almost the same file. One is embedded *.afphoto file, the other is the same *.afphoto file duplicated and rasterized. But the masking effect is completely different. Is this the behavior you expect from a very deeply integrated software package? (embedded *.afphoto clips pixel layer to border not to alpha) You don’t use masking. Then the layer thumbnail of the child layer would be rendered white, not black. so you are using clipping. Quote Mac mini M1 A2348 | MBP M3 Windows 11 - AMD Ryzen 9 5900x - 32 GB RAM - Nvidia GTX 1080 LG34WK950U-W, calibrated to DCI-P3 with LG Calibration Studio / Spider 5 | Dell 27“ 4K iPad Air Gen 5 (2022) A2589 Special interest into procedural texture filter, edit alpha channel, RGB/16 and RGB/32 color formats, stacking, finding root causes for misbehaving files, finding creative solutions for unsolvable tasks, finding bugs in Apps. I use iPad screenshots and videos even in the Desktop section of the forum when I expect no relevant difference.
wintermute Posted November 20, 2024 Author Posted November 20, 2024 2 minutes ago, Return said: Instead of short sentences of what you think is a bug you should be posting according to the guidelines. Where it is asked to provide a recipe for your issue. with preferably screenshots or video with steps of the issue. And an example file for others or the Q&A to help you out to resolve it. It is only feedback. According sub-forum name. i like AD but i far from claming that it is everything i dreamed about. Quote
wintermute Posted November 20, 2024 Author Posted November 20, 2024 Just now, NotMyFault said: You don’t use masking. Then the layer thumbnail of the child layer would be rendered white, not black. so you are using clipping. of course you are right - in case of bitmap layer there is no other option. Sorry for semantic misunderstanding. Quote
NotMyFault Posted November 20, 2024 Posted November 20, 2024 6 minutes ago, wintermute said: in case of bitmap layer there is no other option. No, bitmap layers offer same options as vector layers. but both behave different, explaining what you see. It is by design. a nested bitmap layers is clipped based on the alpha channel of the parent layer (in case parent is bitmap layer). a nested bitmap layer is fully visible inside the curve path of any non-bitmap layer. Embedded files and image layers are essentially a vector layer with a bitmap fill, and act as vector layers. It ignores the alpha channel of parent layer. wintermute 1 Quote Mac mini M1 A2348 | MBP M3 Windows 11 - AMD Ryzen 9 5900x - 32 GB RAM - Nvidia GTX 1080 LG34WK950U-W, calibrated to DCI-P3 with LG Calibration Studio / Spider 5 | Dell 27“ 4K iPad Air Gen 5 (2022) A2589 Special interest into procedural texture filter, edit alpha channel, RGB/16 and RGB/32 color formats, stacking, finding root causes for misbehaving files, finding creative solutions for unsolvable tasks, finding bugs in Apps. I use iPad screenshots and videos even in the Desktop section of the forum when I expect no relevant difference.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.