Without losing perspective - Part 2

[Ian G]

Morning,
at last I have something to show for my efforts. Not perfect, but getting there. My biggest challenge now is how to explain how I got this far. Basically I started out with a cube, dropped that idea and played with the perspective of one side. The pattern of the tile is a jpg which was dropped on top. A mixture of 'Live group perspective' and 'Warp group perspective'. I hope that makes some sort of sense.

The feeling I have is that I have used the provebial sledge hammer to crack a walnut. Looking at the result in the light of day perhaps I should revisit 'snapping' amongst other tools.

[GarryP]

Do you have a question about that or are you just showing us a ‘work in progress’?

[Dan C]

i've moved this to -share your work-.

Lee

[Alfred]

51 minutes ago, GarryP said:

Do you have a question about that or are you just showing us a ‘work in progress’?

The ‘sledgehammer to crack a walnut’ comment does seem to imply that the OP would like to know whether there’s a simpler way to achieve the same end result.

[Ian G]

OP? I misread that as OaP, what is an OP? Yes, I have been wondering how others would do this? It certainly needs tidying up?

[GarryP]

OP = Original Poster – the person who started the thread.

If you can tell us what you want to ‘tidy up’ – we don’t know what you were trying to achieve – then we should have some suggestions.

[walt.farrell]

This is a follow-on to two prior threads. @Ian G: It would help if you stayed in the original thread.

 And