Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone know why / if there is any logic to the seemingly random way scaling switches from Shift click on individial objects and multiple objects giving scaling from the lower left corner, to Ctrl clickas soon as the same objects are groupled, now scaling from the centre but shift no longer scales??

Am I missing some weird hidden option or is it just a bug?

Posted

The default Setting for Move Tool Aspect Constrain is "Automatic (based on selection)":

image.png.aa816764dfc54edbc13bb3e1d880f000.png

Perhaps you would prefer one of the other choices:

image.png.48122650d9379337c73a7caebc810cf8.png

Basically, with automatic: 

  • if the object you're resizing has an implicit aspect ratio (e.g., an Image layer) then if you don't press Shift the resizing will be constrained to that aspect ratio. If you press Shift, the resizing will be unconstrained.
  • if the object you're resizing does not have an implicit aspect ratio (e.g., a shape or a group of objects) then if you don't press Shift the resizing will be unconstrained, but if you do it will be constrained.

Many users seem to find this confusing.

-- Walt
Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases
PC:
    Desktop:  Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 

    Laptop:  Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU.
    Laptop 2: Windows 11 Pro 24H2,  16GB memory, Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E80100 - Qualcomm(R) Oryon(TM) 12 Core CPU 4.01 GHz, Qualcomm(R) Adreno(TM) X1-85 GPU
iPad:  iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 18.5, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard 
Mac:  2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sequoia 15.5

Posted
1 hour ago, walt.farrell said:

Many users seem to find this confusing.

That's why I proposed changing the cursor type a long time ago, which would clearly indicate the type and change of behavior.

It's really confusing that way, even if you know it. That's why I have Automatic turned off in Preferences.

Affinity Store (MSI/EXE): Affinity Suite (ADe, APh, APu) 2.5.7.2948 (Retail)
Dell OptiPlex 7060, i5-8500 3.00 GHz, 16 GB, Intel UHD Graphics 630, Dell P2417H 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 24H2, Build 26100.2605.
Dell Latitude E5570, i5-6440HQ 2.60 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics 530, 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 24H2, Build 26100.2605.
Intel NUC5PGYH, Pentium N3700 2.40 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics, EIZO EV2456 1920 x 1200, Windows 10 Pro, Version 21H1, Build 19043.2130.

Posted

Wow - that's so messed up in terms of workflow and minutae logic before meta logic and usability it's worthy of Adobe. Edit: Thank you for the info - looks like that's what I was looking for ( I searched for all the keywords before posting could not find anything).

I very much agree re: cursor but also it'd be a lot easier if they set key and a function globally to an intuitively logical default eg Click+Shift scales proportinally, not Shift doesn't. 

Posted
11 hours ago, walt.farrell said:

The default Setting for Move Tool Aspect Constrain is "Automatic (based on selection)":

image.png.aa816764dfc54edbc13bb3e1d880f000.png

Perhaps you would prefer one of the other choices:

image.png.48122650d9379337c73a7caebc810cf8.png

Basically, with automatic: 

  • if the object you're resizing has an implicit aspect ratio (e.g., an Image layer) then if you don't press Shift the resizing will be constrained to that aspect ratio. If you press Shift, the resizing will be unconstrained.
  • if the object you're resizing does not have an implicit aspect ratio (e.g., a shape or a group of objects) then if you don't press Shift the resizing will be unconstrained, but if you do it will be constrained.

Many users seem to find this confusing.

This is my man right here because I have always overlooked this little detail in the preferences. And thank you, because I need this lol.

The Adobe reference by @Grow Genius is too poignant. One just accepts so many odd quirks as "the norm" after a number of years as "the way it's done" because there's usually no other option given, we must comply. I don't even entertain the idea that there might actually be a way out. But aah, there's a choice in preferences. Changing that right now.

And this is one reason I stick with Affinity despite the long bug list and any number of issues. Little things like this.

Posted
3 hours ago, Grow Genius said:

Wow - that's so messed up in terms of workflow and minutae logic before meta logic and usability it's worthy of Adobe.

There is nothing wrong with the logic. It is based on the 'natural' (implicit) aspect ratio of certain object types, which is quite useful in workflows when you want to preserve that aspect ratio of those object types but not for the others without having to use a keyboard key for either one.

It is just not as obvious as it could be to new users, much like the difference between Pixel & Image layers. 

All 3 1.10.8, & all 3 V2.6 Mac apps; 2020 iMac 27"; 3.8GHz i7, Radeon Pro 5700, 32GB RAM; macOS 10.15.7
A
ll 3 V2 apps for iPad; 6th Generation iPad 32 GB; Apple Pencil; iPadOS 15.7

Posted
8 hours ago, Grow Genius said:

Wow - that's so messed up in terms of workflow and minutae logic before meta logic and usability

How about this: The automatic setting enables us …

… to maintain the aspect ratio for objects that have a resolution or a 'usual', 'default' aspect ratio – and requires shift to allow stretching. e.g. Image layers, Pixel layers, Text frames. If stretched, these objects may get reset to 'unstretched' with the help of interface items, e.g. DPI value or Character width/height.

… to free scaling for other objects – and requires shift to maintain aspect ratio. e.g. shape objects, curve(s) objects.

I prefer the automatic setting because it works in most cases for me. ( – nevertheless, it may confuse if I'm not aware at certain moments or with certain object types, e.g. Group layers and especially with parts of vector illustrations that should not get stretched. For those the need to press shift may be disturbing – but still more comfortable than a need to press shift in general to either maintain or stretch.)

For Group layers it may be worth to get an outer handle added. (compare: Picture frames, Text frames)

• MacBookPro Retina 15" |  macOS 10.14.6  | Eizo 27" | Affinity V1  
• iPad 10.Gen.  |  iOS 18.5.  |  Affinity V2.6

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.