Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

When an image is select a handy Replace Image button is added to the Context Toolbar. I'd love to be able to replace the image via a keyboard shortcut so it would be nice if File > Place replaced the selected image rather than placing a new one.

I often select an image to replace but then mindlessly press my keyboard shortcut to place an image when I really want to replace the selected image. This would normally be minor, just click to place the new image, delete the old one, and move the new one to the same position. But I'm replacing images inside of inline groups. If I place the image, it will obscure the original one and then I'll have to move the new image to the same position, select the image below it and delete it, all while the text is being reflowed because the group's bounding box changed when I placed the image and again when I moved it.

So rather than go through that each time I do this I cancel the place, double click the image to select it again (because it's inside a group) and then click Replace Image. It would be so much nicer if Place Image defaulted to replacing the selected image. Or if there was an option to do this if others wouldn't want that to happen.

Thanks

Posted

Hmm, I would now always expect place image in the file menu to place a new element regardless.

For clarity, place image should be renamed to replace image in that scenario. But I'm not keen on the method.

I have always used a replace image from the toolbar or mini toolbar over a selected image in all programs when I have replaced something, which is what I would prefer here.

Ah, your shortcut. Hm, it could ask the user place or replace perhaps.

🙂

I simply no longer believe that there are any professional graphic designers here. Everything follows suit. Just everything.

 

Posted

It seems to make sense that if you hit a shortcut for "File - Place" it places a new image, but if you select an existing image first, it replaces the selected image instead!

Acer XC-895 Core i5-10400 Hexa-core 2.90 GHz : 32GB RAM : Intel UHD Graphics 630 – Windows 11 Home - Affinity Publisher, Photo & Designer, v2
(As I am a Windows user, any answers/comments I contribute may not apply to Mac or iPad.)

Posted
55 minutes ago, Bit Arts said:

I don't agree. A good user interface is more concise.

There are many, many features that are context sensitive and good usability takes context into account. If the cursor is beside a cross-reference the insert cross-reference command is replaced by edit cross-reference. Same for inserting and editing hyperlinks, anchors, and index marks.

But back on topic, if a picture frame is selected then File > Place will replace image but if an image that isn't in a picture frame is selected then File > Place will not replace the image. So in that light, what I'm asking for is for File > Place to work consistently for images that are in frames and not in frames.

And if others don't like it then perhaps it could be an option. This is super annoying for me because I have two books on the go. For my history book all of the several hundred images are in picture frames so to replace them I press my keyboard shortcut. For my Publisher manual, none of the thousands of images are in picture frames and every single time I press my keyboard shortcut it places a new image instead of replacing it. So to me this inconsistent behaviour feels wrong.

Posted
7 hours ago, MikeTO said:

But back on topic, if a picture frame is selected then File > Place will replace image but if an image that isn't in a picture frame is selected then File > Place will not replace the image. So in that light, what I'm asking for is for File > Place to work consistently for images that are in frames and not in frames.

Fair point, I agree. Concise and consistent behavior, please. 🙂

I simply no longer believe that there are any professional graphic designers here. Everything follows suit. Just everything.

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, LondonSquirrel said:

But they are two different things. Why would/should things work the same way? Apart from convenience (to whoever wants/needs it)? 

It's not like an image in a picture frame looks like it's in a picture frame, it looks like a picture.

I'm not trying to convince you to work this way, I'm simply asking for an option to allow Place to work the same way for pictures as it does for picture frames. If you don't like it, don't turn it on.

Posted

I would like it. It would be one of those small things making the workflow much faster and less carpal-tunnel-syndrome prone.

Paolo

 

  • 5 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.