Lindsay Wilson Posted February 11, 2023 Posted February 11, 2023 Summary: If I have a single self-intersecting curve in Designer (“D” in the attached) and expand the stroke, it produces “E”. The intersections have been erased/joined, however its best to describe. What I’d like it to produce instead is “I”, where the edges of the stroke at the intersections are left alone. This all arose from my experiments using expand stroke then shape builder to build up interlacing knot work designs. If all the curves are discrete, “A”, then this works great, and produces “C”. However, if any of the curves self-intersect, like “D”, the it fails, because expand stroke doesn’t produce the stroke edges at the intersections. I hope this makes sense. A fix is to deliberately split the stroke somewhere and then expand the resulting curves. However, there are certain situations where I can’t do this (namely, where I have used a tapered stroke profile) and would really prefer to just expand the one curve directly. If it was possible to add an option to control how expand stroke behaves at self-intersections, it would be awesome. It could either do the default behaviour, where it simply outlines everything that appears black, or it actually traces the edges of the stroke. ADDITIONAL: A similar option would also be invaluable for the contour tool! lepr, Rudolphus, loukash and 2 others 5 Quote
loukash Posted February 12, 2023 Posted February 12, 2023 9 hours ago, Lindsay Wilson said: add an option to control how expand stroke behaves at self-intersections +1! Lindsay Wilson and Markio 2 Quote MacBookAir 15": MacOS Ventura > Affinity v1, v2, v2 beta // MacBookPro 15" mid-2012: MacOS El Capitan > Affinity v1 / MacOS Catalina > Affinity v1, v2, v2 beta // iPad 8th: iPadOS 16 > Affinity v2
MrBazza Posted March 19, 2023 Posted March 19, 2023 i was about to post the similar. It would be really usefull to have an option to select between three modes ignore self intersections (existing behaviour E above), include self intersections (I) or follow path (H) Quote
MrBazza Posted March 19, 2023 Posted March 19, 2023 … clarification … (H) above might still have to be a manual action to get the unders and overs you want but the folllow path option I am suggesting could always pass under (or over) self … perhaps thats another option 🙂 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.