Update V2

[Yosh Noah]

you should make a package just for windows and another one just for mac and another one for ipad, with better prices and
keep the universal package for those with more than 1 system, because really anyone who has a mac won't buy a 
windows desktop, so it would be a license without utility and vice versa, another option would also be to improve the
unit value of the software, especially for users who have version 1.0  

[loukash]

5 minutes ago, Yosh Noah said:

really anyone who has a mac won't buy a windows desktop

I'd really like to see the methodology and the full results of your scientific survey.

[Yosh Noah]

I say that those who have a platform, whether Windows or Mac, will not switch to the other, which they are already used to using, that's why 
I talked about the license, who ends up buying the pack with the license, but will never use these licenses another platform!
but this does not apply to all users, because there are many who have more than one PC and the universal license will be of great use,
but it would not be the case for everyone!

[Andreas Scherer]

AFAIR, the three individual Mac licenses (with discount 150 €) are more expensive than the Universal License (120 €), so I chose the UL on Nov 9. It might also come handy if I were to buy an iPad in future.

[walt.farrell]

10 hours ago, Yosh Noah said:

you should make a package just for windows and another one just for mac and another one for ipad, with better prices

The Universal License already gives you possibility of getting all 3 apps for your OS for the price of about 2.5 apps, if I've done the calculation correctly. I doubt they could make it much less than that, even for a single OS. And inventing a 3rd kind of license will take more development and support work, making everything more complex. So it might not be any cheaper at all.

I doubt it will happen, but you're free to ask, of course.