Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Bring back Layer on/off checkboxes


Recommended Posts

Can we please bring back the checkmark boxes for the layers. I dont know why they were changed to circles. Who asked for this? No one told serif to change this. Nobody requested this. Dont fix whats not broken. Now we're having these debates about this new on/off circle icon that we shouldnt even be having. And theres bearly any contrast with this new circle on/off icon. When you turn off the layer its this dark gray circle on dark gray. Its just hard to see. Like, a checkmark is a good indicator to tell if a layer is on or off. Why change it? 

Theres also an issue on AD v2 on ipad where the new on/off circles in the layers vanish. Theres no button to turn your layer on or off. I have to close the app and reopen it. 

 

Ugh! Like, this seriously was the least of our problems. I go back to AD v1 on ipad and Im back to how it used to be. My problem is solved. I have my checkmark box in my layers but then I look up and realize that theres a bunch of affinity users debating about an on/off icon in v2. Why? Why are we debating over something that was never a problem? Now a problem has been creating for nothing and our energy is going towards it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I have no problem with dots to indicate Activity and Visibility, I would just suggest using solid and hollow dots to indicate ON and OFF status, not brightness of dots.

image.png.137d4072d685f9700db958b71e6c6944.png

Solid/hollow dot is a visually understandable and unambiguous, and also saves space in the Layers panel (thanks for that).

Affinity Store (MSI/EXE): Affinity Suite (ADe, APh, APu) 2.4.0.2301
Dell OptiPlex 7060, i5-8500 3.00 GHz, 16 GB, Intel UHD Graphics 630, Dell P2417H 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Dell Latitude E5570, i5-6440HQ 2.60 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics 530, 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Intel NUC5PGYH, Pentium N3700 2.40 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics, EIZO EV2456 1920 x 1200, Windows 10 Pro, Version 21H1, Build 19043.2130.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/14/2022 at 11:23 AM, Designer1234 said:

But difference between active and inactive state is huge...

The difference between the states is really big, but only if you have a direct comparison with the surroundings - for example, with layers in the ON state, or with layer names with a user-defined name.
image.png.69e20e80aa0c82fec947649c34c6302d.png

However, if all the surrounding/visible layers are also in the OFF state, and the layer names are in the default naming (which again incorrectly reduce the intensity of the text *1), then the mentioned "difference" is problematic - it is not unambiguous, and that's about it you need to think - it's not easy to recognize at first glance.

image.png.0ab28180273fb4c133087bd629f8d2e6.png

 

*1) I understand that it is appropriate to differentiate the default/auto-defined layer name from the user-specified one, but reducing the intensity for this is definitely not appropriate. Decreasing the intensity is used to indicate a disabled state, when the control element cannot be controlled,
image.png.af315735918fc332dad5958717e06908.png image.png.061a1f18bbab2896edc87f58a9d4d36e.png

and to indicate an inactive state, e.g. tab for hidden/inactive panels.
image.png.a834c3533e37f0a33b5e14c763a94b2c.png

To differentiate the default/automatically defined layer name, for example, italics would be more appropriate.

 

Also, the size of elements and their descriptions is inconsistent and unbalanced.
For example, here the Opacity in the Layers panel compared to the other descriptions.
image.png.bd2156c045e1d35eb62d3e372bd454ae.png

 

Affinity Store (MSI/EXE): Affinity Suite (ADe, APh, APu) 2.4.0.2301
Dell OptiPlex 7060, i5-8500 3.00 GHz, 16 GB, Intel UHD Graphics 630, Dell P2417H 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Dell Latitude E5570, i5-6440HQ 2.60 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics 530, 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Intel NUC5PGYH, Pentium N3700 2.40 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics, EIZO EV2456 1920 x 1200, Windows 10 Pro, Version 21H1, Build 19043.2130.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/13/2022 at 11:55 PM, MoonaticDestiny said:

Can we please bring back the checkmark boxes for the layers

 

On 11/14/2022 at 9:11 AM, WhiteX said:

The difference between active and inactive items is too subtle, it makes my brain work unnecessarily to process this information. This needs some improvement.

 

Please bring back the checkboxes in V2. I have now all V2 applications in the light UI style, because only there the difference is well recognizable. in the dark design I do not see whether a layer is active.

In the Layer Effects area the checkboxes are present in V2.

LayerEffects.PNG

 

                                                                                                                                                          
Desktop: Windows 10 22H2 / Intel i5-9600K / 32 GB RAM / Affinity Suite V1 (work) and Affinity Suite V2 (test) for Windows

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bsx said:

Please bring back the checkboxes in V2. I have now all V2 applications in the light UI style, because only there the difference is well recognizable. in the dark design I do not see whether a layer is active.

In the Layer Effects area the checkboxes are present in V2.

LayerEffects.PNG

Brilliant, and exactly!

 

These 'dots' are a pretty odd visual symbol and regression for one of the most used functionalities in the entire product line.

Instead of changing these to a dot, using the exact same boxes as used for Layer Effect state would have been far wiser use of time and consistently useful, perhaps even freeing up some developer time for truly useful Layer features:

Is it possible to hold down a modifier and drag across multiple layers to activate/deactivate?

Can Layer State Sets be saved?

Is there a shortcut for "isolate" and "un-isolate" any currently selected Layer? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, perhaps all disabled layers with default names can be misleading, but when you open your first doc you immediately learn how active layer indicator looks like. However I think I understand what you tried to show and generally I agree that adding contours to the dots can be helpful (which you don't as I understand ;)). 

Still, I don't agree that dots (also with contours) are inaccurate because of some "radio button principle"  or just because checkboxes were more common 20 years ago :) 

As for the layers - I my opinion grayed out default names are 1000% correct because in such configuration named layers become easier to distinguish and you can add some hierarchy to them: named are more important thus highlighted and easier to find on the list.

On the other hand - It won't be a disaster if checkboxes are restored. I just think that dots works well too:) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Designer1234 said:

However I think I understand what you tried to show and generally I agree that adding contours to the dots can be helpful (which you don't as I understand ;)). 

Unfortunately, it is not clear whose post you are responding to, but from the text you could assume that it was mine. But then I do not at all understand your impression that I do not understand the principle of solid and hollow dots, when I myself proposed it!

Affinity Store (MSI/EXE): Affinity Suite (ADe, APh, APu) 2.4.0.2301
Dell OptiPlex 7060, i5-8500 3.00 GHz, 16 GB, Intel UHD Graphics 630, Dell P2417H 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Dell Latitude E5570, i5-6440HQ 2.60 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics 530, 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Intel NUC5PGYH, Pentium N3700 2.40 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics, EIZO EV2456 1920 x 1200, Windows 10 Pro, Version 21H1, Build 19043.2130.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's just remember in the heat of battle that these checkmarks were cursed to hell in much user feedback over the years, so there are divided opinions on how it should work.

I prefer the classic eye/eye with line through as it creates consistency across applications from all vendors. And by the way, I don't bother discussing that, it's my preference and the de facto standard over decades. A checkmark just signals... more.

I'm fine with the v2 solution by the way. Just prefer standards or de fact standards.

 1) You have completely wrecked the layers panel, Serif.

2) I recommend Reddit groups instead of this forum. Not the same few bot-like users replying to everything, a wider representation of users, fewer fanboys, more qualified users. In short, better!

3) I was here to report bugs and submit improvement requests for professional work professionally in a large setup and to bring a lot of knowledge from the world, i.e. professional product development, web- and software development, usability, user experience design and accessibility. I actually know what I am talking about!

BUT! We are phasing out Designer and Affinity in 2022 Q1 - and replacing it with feature complete and algorithmically competent alternatives.
Publisher is unsuitable for serious use, and was never adopted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Pšenda said:

But then I do not at all understand your impression that I do not understand the principle of solid and hollow dots, when I myself proposed it!

Oh, sorry, It seems I've mixed two posts of different users :P as well as dots and text labels cases :). Indeed, you actually wrote about contoured dots as a first person here! 
So it seems we agree on this, and I also like the fact the dots compact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want the checkbox back as well.
Color and opacity should never be the only way to differentiate between states. This is a fundamental rule when building accessible interfaces.
Many people have visual deficiencies or one form or another of color blindness.
A good state indicator uses different shapes to distinguish between different states. And the boring old checkbox is perfect for this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 11/14/2022 at 11:23 AM, Designer1234 said:

But difference between active and inactive state is huge...

I will just add a situation in which it is clear that the coding of the "status" (on/off, active/inactive) into the intensity of control element, into which is also coded the standard option of editing the status (enable/disable), is completely inappropriate.
Let's have a Master page with active and inactive layers. Layers are allowed to change state, and the difference in intensity is apparent.
image.png.0623aafe9bc415e9ea3194c81e6a34d9.png

But if we use this master page, then in the Layers panel these elements are not editable (they are disabled), and therefore their intensity is suppressed.
Then four different states/intensities need to be displayed.
image.png.52c796124a1d3b1fadc54a2659cf5b8d.png

If they are displayed like this right next to each other, it is possible to distinguish the state and editability of the element, but if the elements are far from each other, or if not all of them are displayed in the Layers panel, then the unambiguous determination of the state of the element is problematic.

P.S. coding two properties into a control's intensity is just a very bad concept.

 

Affinity Store (MSI/EXE): Affinity Suite (ADe, APh, APu) 2.4.0.2301
Dell OptiPlex 7060, i5-8500 3.00 GHz, 16 GB, Intel UHD Graphics 630, Dell P2417H 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Dell Latitude E5570, i5-6440HQ 2.60 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics 530, 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Intel NUC5PGYH, Pentium N3700 2.40 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics, EIZO EV2456 1920 x 1200, Windows 10 Pro, Version 21H1, Build 19043.2130.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/14/2022 at 12:11 AM, Pšenda said:

Personally, I have no problem with dots to indicate Activity and Visibility, I would just suggest using solid and hollow dots to indicate ON and OFF status, not brightness of dots.

image.png.137d4072d685f9700db958b71e6c6944.png

Solid/hollow dot is a visually understandable and unambiguous, and also saves space in the Layers panel (thanks for that).

I think solid and hollow dots should instead be reserved for handles to drag layer content with, like in Illustrator. That would help not having to dig into nested layers and to show where selected objects are selected from when performing a Select > Same operation. Currently, this entire process of seeing selections is rather hidden from view in the Layers studio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.