Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Footnotes support in IDML import


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

After buying Affinity suite the other day I was happy that footnotes etc was added to version2.  I cannot use Adobe InDesign anymore and my CS6 version does not work on the Mac OS Big Sur upgrade I did to enable me to purchase Affinity.  I was able to import all footnotes through MS Word no problem, but all update were made in Adobe InDesign, so spelling and grammar adjustments are lost and have to be done in the word file. Layouts done in past projects I did for clients and brought into Affinity by importing the IDML files has left me with a sour taste in my mouth.  Footnotes do not come along with the rest of the text and text styles into Affinity Publisher at all.  This is bad.  This is the very reason we are making the transition away from Adobe and being able to bring projects into Affinity if there are future updates to books etc that need us to open the original layouts within Affinity.

Please, please, please Affinity, update the IDML import ability to enable footnotes, endnotes etc to be intact and into Affinity and bring it up to scratch.  This is very important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...

Currently, the only way would be to import the IDML in Apub to get the format; then, to export the text with footnotes from ID to Word; then, to import the Word file in Apub with footontes.

Anyhow, Affinity must support footnotes/endnotes (and, later, index entries) in IDML import.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Footnote importing is not arriving in the 2.2 version either. I hope they are working on it for future versions in 2.

I installed the trial version of Publisher two days ago after having font problems in InDesign. I had heard good things and was excited to try it and potentially buy it. I then followed the Affinity Publisher Essentials video course on LinkedIn Learning and was impressed by how Publisher 2.1 handled certain things compared to InDesign. I thought, 'Of course! Affinity got it right!'

But then I tried importing my IDML file and none of the footnotes were included. This was a shock. I'm a non-fiction author with hundreds of InDesign files that are filled with thousands of footnotes. Prior to this, I was mentally prepared to export each IDML file and switch over to Publisher, but now there's no way I'm adding those footnotes back in by hand. Same for index entries.

I also tried adjusting font styles, and each time I did so, the program froze for 10 to 30 seconds. That's even with having a brand-new gaming laptop with an RTX 4070, a Ryzen 9 CPU, and 64 GB of ram. Turns out that this is a bug reported on this forum in at least 2018, and is still an issue, despite supposed fixes. Some users say it's due to different versions of the .net framework. Maybe in my case it's because I have video games installed via Steam that install different .net versions as a matter of course for being able to run the games? I tried a suggested workaround, but to no avail. In any case, it's frustrating and put a blemish on my experience. It raised concerns about the current and future quality of the app.

The second deal-breaker was no epub export. This is a must-have feature for an indie publisher. Flowable text 3.0 epubs would be fine for now. Fixed are far less important.

Publisher does so many things right, but as it stands, I won't be buying Publisher until they announce that they are adding better import features and an epub export feature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

I feel the same disappointment. I hoped that they would add this feature in the 2.3 update, so I would then buy it during the Cyber Monday sale in November. But this is missing, as is epub export, which are the two features I need in order to abandon InDesign.

Now it's a question of whether I should buy software that I can't use, in the hope that I'll be able to use it some day? It'd be nice if they would at least say they're working on it, so I could have more faith in my potential purchase.

On the bright side, they announced that their future updates will arrive sooner than before, at every 4 to 6 weeks. So, we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, derekpadula said:

Now it's a question of whether I should buy software that I can't use, in the hope that I'll be able to use it some day?

No, do not purchase it. "Some day" may never come.

Mac Pro (Late 2013) Mac OS 12.7.4 
Affinity Designer 2.4.1 | Affinity Photo 2.4.1 | Affinity Publisher 2.4.1 | Beta versions as they appear.

I have never mastered color management, period, so I cannot help with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

Agreed. I was disappointed by today's 2.4 release notes, as I don't have an interest in any of those features or enhancements, and will likely never use them. But when reading each update, I saw a lot of people who are glad those updates are coming.

It'll probably be another two to three months until the 2.5 beta is announced and we'll see if they provide the features we're looking for here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.