Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

AI picture generators urgently required


Recommended Posts

Have a look here to understand how photo editors will use AI generated images in the future. Just released, its already heavily impacting the industry. But Affinity Photo is lacking an SDK, so no plugin for us - while GIMP, Krita, Photoshop, ... already have working versions!

If Affinity sleeps through it, it can damage their whole future quite fast - PLEASE react and either finally provide an SDK (WHY IS THERE NONE???) or integrate e.g. Stable Diffusion into your products...

 

to und 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you care to describe how this affects the industry, and what is this really used for? I understand it's AI image generation plugin. I don't want to start this pointless discussion, but - who would need AI generated imaginery? It's fun to see it can be done, but what are the real usage scenarios? I mean, Advertisement needs "their" product in the pictures. Photographers want "their" photos to be made with their camera equipment. Graphics designers whole job is to design, and not to let AI design.

So what is the real point in this. We live in a strange world in which article creation, and opinion creation, becomes a norm. This is not normal to substitute "real" photos or images with generated ones.
We already have a talk when someone makes women too slim on the picture etc..
Soon we will have more problems when people will once actually go outside, leaving their phone or computer home just to will realize that "real" world isn't so perfect as it's digital - AI generated illusion looked like on the web.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess as always with progress its about effectivity: Sure you can draw everything on a piece of paper, its just more efficient to use readily available brushes and the many tools a software offers you instead. Here in this case, the workflow will be a close mixture of AI and manuell edits to take the best of both worlds - but for that you need seamless integration.

And with that type of software, the job of a grafic designer will change drastically: Have a look at https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/midjourney/?hl=de : These are all pictures created by "amateurs" with the help of AI - why would I pay a designer for that if AI can do it better, faster? These AI models were released only 4 weeks ago and already have huge impact - just imagine 1 year of improvements and integration into workflows...

 

AI grafic design is there, it will be HEAVILY used to create/modify pictures, and without an plugin interface, Affinity Photo will totally miss that train.

Edited by drstreit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be interested in seeing some AI features too.

I would much prefer an API to allow me build my own plugins though as this feels to me like a better use of the development resource.

In addition to Affinity products I also use Blender extensively and I've recently been using DALL-E to to perform more creative in (and out) painting to textures and material images. Source and reference images occasionally arrive with too severe a crop or with noisy objects spoiling the composition. This feature of DALL-E is very helpful in extending sets/scenery and removing objects. Although the AP inpainting feature is very useful for large areas it can often get stuck in a rut with high contrast changes and clone copies appearing which means you have to use other approaches like cloning or painting. I also have a frequent need for seamless textures which often require lots of fiddle and faff in AP. Creating these in DALL-E (after some pre-processing in AP) nearly always gives me the best results.

As a separate issue, I think that the industry is changing. AI is not going to go away. I'm already seeing marketing departments getting excited at (the potential of) not having to hire me to do some of the work they need. I, personally, feel that excitement is a little premature and that my skillset is still going to be required to complete the pipeline. Currently, the diffusion method that is popular isn't doing much to help with vector designs. My opinion is that these tools will help with inspiration and create a new kind of idea sketching that will be upstream of what designers and artists will receive as part of a brief and may even be part of their toolkits. It has already helped me with the blank canvas block syndrome for getting started after receiving intangible wording for an idea from the client.

AI is part of the designer/artist future and we need to embrace it and understand it. That's not to say that it is good - a lot of what I've seen is rubbish, but it is getting better at some things. It is early days and things are developing quickly, plus there are still lots of problems.  There are huge legal and ethical issues surrounding the sourcing and curating of the source training data. The web might be public access but that doesn't make all the images visible on it CC0!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great post, PaulMc!

I wholehearty agree - I also do not see AI as replacement, but as an important part of a pipeline of the future (even soon for vector grafics: That is due to the early stage of the software, but seperating the results into vectors should actually be quite easy, shouldnt it?). 

Still the question is open: What are Serif's plans for the future here? And sidenote: Not really answering the communitys question about SDK access for months (beside: "Not planned") is not really something I do understand... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is going to destroy many jobs, and possibly, due to drastically reducing the people interest in learning anymore the very difficult craft of drawing and painting (which requires extreme training in anatomy perspective, color, lighting, actual painting materials and brushes., etc, etc) , and whenever that happens to a field, when society decides that something or someone is of no social interest anymore, or it's not "trendy", when competition is reduced to almost zero, due to people avoiding the entire career, vanished the motivation for people to invest a life in preparing for becoming an actual painter or illustrator... Then with zero to no competition (in every field or market), quality goes to the drain, all that know-how is lost, even the knowledge of it. This happened very intensely in the medieval age to all arts, coming from the brilliant Roman and Greek era (the Romans were cultured enough to respect the Greek legacy and maintain a lot of it) once the "barbarians" (did not have the pejorative meaning as now) put an end to the empire.

True that AI now can't consistently work in an style. It's mixing and photo bashing among other generation techniques. Also, that a painter puts her/his soul in every brush stroke, that is not possible either with AI. And mostly, that a computer or AI algorithm will never have real emotions (as much, an approximation, as it can't have consciousness, so, no self awareness, neither "intent"). By the definition related to expression that is art, it will not be making "art". But the society at large won't initially care for that (once it does, might be too late).  Despite that last permanent advantage, the job itself will most surely die (or for the biggest chunk of artists), as general public typically just want mediocre solutions. We will see great artists replaced by "prompt engineers". Translating that: mostly what the client uses to do ( "I want a red unicorn with purple browses and a rainbow in the background, with very threatening dark clouds around it").  Which, of course, is not "art" by any means. With the definition of art in hand, nothing of that will be art, neither will ever be able to be, but that will not matter, history repeats itself (another reason why studying it is crucial, but, like philosophy, it is yet another subject which importance and effective hours have been progressively reduced at schools).

Yes, it's great news for the commissioners, average janes/joes and etc who think that it is enough for the images of their small businesses (main clients for commissions and current gigs for artists) . But in the end, it will bite all of us in, ehm, right there, once we realize what we have lost. Meanwhile, AI (and robots) will keep destroying many jobs/careers in other fields as well. Some of the current defenders of this will complain when their turn comes (another thing that is cyclic in history, there's even a very famous quote about it).

My advice to my fellow painters and illustrators: We'd better move towards the activity (I've been doing it for a while) of programming (and if after all what's happening with the AI coding, coders say sth to generate you impostor syndrome.... PLEEEASE...send them my way.... mwahaha). That one will also ultimately be filled by AIs, but will take many more years, and you could always design/program more complex AIs, having a job there. 

The one only hope is that governments and international regulation starts putting rigid limits to this (it has been mentioned as a very likely possibility, although I'm not that optimistic about it). Indeed, if one would have been paying attention to a bunch of well known economists, there's this theory (both in right  and left sides of the political spectrum, as that also exists among economists, of course) which says that at some point, governments will have to impose to large companies (to be able to operate in the country's soil in certain conditions) a huge tax for using robots and AI which effectively are substituting like a (for example) 90%  of the work force or more, this tax income to be used directly by the gov to provide with an UBI, universal basic income for an x percentage of the population (those not coding, neither rich :D ). This theory (and there seems to be quite quorum about it) establishes that, otherwise, social stability wouldn't be possible, including riots, massive hunger, and very importantly, having very low to no consumption, which is the main engine of any economy, making economies development extremely difficult. I mean, even some fierce capitalist ones have stated this will be a need. Now... I don't love a society filled with people doing close to nothing just receiving their plate of food (and so... dependent on the authority in too many ways, quite more than now) from the government, with no aspiration to grow (no position to grow to), etc.

So, while I agree with how unavoidable it is, can't share a single millimeter (or 1/25.4 or an inch) of enthusiasm about it. Art creation from sketch to finished painting is a therapy for creators, from painters to sculptors, to musicians, and when it has been an act of love in every brush stroke, every line, it is something that society (as audience/spectators/consumers) needs more than it knows (from comic creation to decorative art, to many things) . Also, once we reduce drastically the amount of actual real creators of styles, painters that know about sketching, anatomy drawing, composition, color, etc, AI itself will have a much poorer data base to "feed" from, given a certain time period, IMO, degrading the field more and more. So... great!.  

But as I said, the solution for many people in these fields is... (I've done this so many times in my life) changing not just jobs but careers... Artists becoming programmers, other people filling up jobs that need human attention (specially in healthcare, that's another (of the extremely few) sector I predict to keep strong, maybe indefinitely, even if AI and robots there will invade many jobs, too).

How was the Martin Niemöller quote... Of course, it referred to a much more dramatic matter, but slightly applies here, as people defending AI removing jobs completely, are those whose jobs, or better said, entire careers,  are not at stake :  

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

Yep, a lot more of a terrible situation, but it replicates on and on in our society and history. Be it what is happening in the third world like since... always... or among the different classes in a first world society, or with the destruction of jobs...

AD, AP and APub. V1.10.6 and V2.4 Windows 10 and Windows 11. 
Ryzen 9 3900X, 32 GB RAM,  RTX 3060 12GB, Wacom Intuos XL, Wacom L. Eizo ColorEdge CS 2420 monitor. Windows 10 Pro.
(Laptop) HP Omen 16-b1010ns 12700H, 32GB DDR5, nVidia RTX 3060 6GB + Huion Kamvas 22 pen display, Windows 11 Pro.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mrqasq said:

Would you care to describe how this affects the industry, and what is this really used for?

Within the Affinity Product Line? many use cases;

  1. Think of it as an addition to the Studio->Stock Panel - an enhancement or replacment to Pexels and Pixabay.
     its going to be the end for many stock image/video sites or even the boom for them if they have more open licensing.
     
  2. Quicker to create or transform existing images or parts of an image into the style of X.
    2.1. training the AI on your own style/selected images to again create unique stuff.
           This can be done with as low as 5 images.
     
  3. Brainstorming/moodboarding helper.
     
  4. Helping artists to explore different artistic choices and placements.
     
  5. Avoiding bad press like Telltale had with too obviously using an image of a murdered diplomat. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41524653
     
  6. Enhancing a scribble/turning it to a finished drawing.

All of this results in more productivity  and churning out more content.
 

Sketchbook (with Affinity Suite usage) | timurariman.com | gumroad.com/myclay
Windows 11 Pro - 22H2 | Ryzen 5800X3D | RTX 3090 - 24GB | 128GB |
Main SSD with 1TB | SSD 4TB | PCIe SSD 256GB (configured as Scratch disk) |

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SrPx said:

Yep, a lot more of a terrible situation, but it replicates on and on in our society and history. Be it what is happening in the third world like since... always... or among the different classes in a first world society, or with the destruction of jobs...

I feel you are not too enthusiastic about AI here - but honestly: Every new technology has every changed some job profiles (or even vanish them). Sure, in 5 years you will be able to tell an AI: "Draw me a 100 pages comic around the story of xyz, don't forget that I love cool sword fights and a happy end" - and it will be delivered in minutes...

Is that good or bad? I tend to see it as good, as every human progress in the end is a good thing from my point of view - but it will take years to adapt: society, job profiles, (mis-)usage etc.

What is the saying? "Society tends to overestimate the short implications of innovation, while underestimates the long term effects..."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signed up just to comment on this thread.  Stable Diffusion is EXPLODING across the internet and it will absolutely revolutionize digital art.  To soak some of it in, visit us over at reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion or just jump on Twitter.  Combining this with photo bashing and there's no way you'll be able to tell that a portion of the piece was "ai generated".

It's nonsense that it will "destroy jobs".  If you're job was to "paint me an vanilla ice cream cone with sprinkles on top that looks like a photograph", well then yes it's over for you.  But if you're using the digital medium to produce graphics, then AI assistance is just one more "Effect" that should be in the tool options.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This one’s for you, @Old Bruce. No AI needed. In fact, no “I” at all!

4EF9DCDE-0ED7-4A5F-81C8-0C432D193467.jpeg.cd0559268c9593bf2a7a34b010f359ed.jpeg

Affinity Photo 2, Affinity Publisher 2, Affinity Designer 2 (latest retail versions) - desktop & iPad
Culling - FastRawViewer; Raw Developer - Capture One Pro; Asset Management - Photo Supreme
Mac Studio with M2 Max (2023}; 64 GB RAM; macOS 13 (Ventura); Mac Studio Display - iPad Air 4th Gen; iPadOS 17

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, drstreit said:

Let us go back to the topic:

*Affinity: Do you plan to support the various AI generators within your product suite? Maybe even spearheading that movement instead of forcing us to go to different products to try it out?

Serif generally does not answer that kind of question, and in fact generally does not comment at all in the Feedback forums.

-- Walt
Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases
PC:
    Desktop:  Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 

    Laptop:  Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU.
iPad:  iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 17.4.1, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard 
Mac:  2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sonoma 14.4.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I stand corrected. The thing that convinced me mostly is Reddit post where children photos were transformed into Disney's princess. I can imagine many parents likening this.  And someone who knows how to use such plugin could possibly make a lot of money on this. Transforming HD pictures to 8bit versions also opened my mind. I generally agree with both sides of people who shared their opinions here :) That's what discussion is all about. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mrqasq said:

 The thing that convinced me mostly is Reddit post where children photos were transformed into Disney's princess. I can imagine many parents likening this. 

I missed that one: Care to share the URL?

Edited by drstreit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, walt.farrell said:

Serif generally does not answer that kind of question, and in fact generally does not comment at all in the Feedback forums.

Hmm - the name of the forum is "Feedback for Affinity Photo on Desktop " - so let us hope they at least read it. 

At the end, we are trying to help - and just plainly ignoring customers is rarely the way to success from my experience...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, drstreit said:

so let us hope they at least read it

They do.

-- Walt
Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases
PC:
    Desktop:  Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 

    Laptop:  Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU.
iPad:  iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 17.4.1, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard 
Mac:  2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sonoma 14.4.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here a nice example what people start doing with AI generators (beside cretaing more cude cats 🐈):

https://beincrypto.com/ai-art-worlds-first-bot-generated-graphic-novel-hits-the-market/

And it also gives a vision how a tool suite like Affinity could deeply integrate it into the workflow for production, optimization, publishing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Few years ago I was super exited  about AI .  Hoped it could help to get rid of  lots  of annoying  routine.  Would make human interaction with a computer much more  simple and let us focus on creative tasks. 

Nothing of this have happened since.    I admit AI  perhaps succeeded in a few very narrow tasks  like coloring b&w images  and de-noising   but mostly AI is a few  useless toys , not helping a bit.   In many cases it rather annoying   like AI selection  always selecting something  you don't need really .      Same with AI usage in other  fields of  computer generated graphic:  AI LODs , AI unwraps , AI  3d modelling     etc   where it's often stupid like a rock  and  also rather annoy you than helps.    Pretty much like  AI  support in your bank.

 

My impression  it will take hundreds of years  till we get any helpful AI  really  and it  dangers only those kinds of jobs where  you couldn't stress  your own brain at all.   You indeed  should get rid of such job asap .      Including  some   brainless art generation tasks.   Like those where you could call anything an art and that in fact was just a happy and fan random canvas smearing or random photo or fonts compositing .    

 

    When it comes to something  where a good taste,  a good sense of nuances , something of a true inventive  nature like  3d animation,   video games  and movie graphics,   fashion and costume design,  something with clear understandable  criteria where you have to find a way to overcome limitations ,  any field where you should solve unsolvable  and   hopeless tasks  and nobody but you could invent how to do it ,  in such fields  AI  is still  totally useless and been a huge disappointment during last decade. 

 

Any content  creation  software  is  still tremendously  inconvenient  and a huge pain in your ass to use ,  and at the same time not that flexible at all.   It all looks like  mad scientist nightmare ,  totally artist unfriendly   , illogical   and  over-complicated.     The adjective "convenient"  next to "software" still  sounds like dry water , an oxymoron  basically .        I wish developers would focus on this issue first.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, kirk23 said:

    When it comes to something  where a good taste,  a good sense of nuances , something of a true inventive  nature like  3d animation,   video games  and movie graphics,   fashion and costume design,  something with clear understandable  criteria where you have to find a way to overcome limitations ,  any field where you should solve unsolvable  and   hopeless tasks  and nobody but you could invent how to do it ,  in such fields  AI  is still  totally useless.

In my humble opinion, you comfuse the current "AI-on-every-tool trend" with the current release of general purpose models.

I am totally with you on the first - "AI" ob everything just relableing old stupid routines mostly. Here I see some progress especially on mobile platforms with face parts recognition, but really nothing groundbreaking - its more marketing than anything else.

A total different story are models such as DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, Midjourney etc: These models are trainied with billion of pictures and are able to put out new things - new in the sense of creative (of course just recombining - but that is the reason I asked for having them as tools for us to guide them within the Affinity suite).

Your same arguments were done with rather similar AI models playing chess, playing go, translating or creating texts etc. - with known results... 

Below some pictures that I just tried to put together for this post (and I am actually quite bad at this currently): I fully trust that you could easily do far better on each style - but can you do it within minutes with hundreds of variations? Its not about stupidly generating pictures from scratch (ok, I admit - its actually really fun doing so 🙂), its about asking the model to create parts of it, combining it, merging it - at the end nothing different than a specialized brush - only more "intelligent"

And last sentence: Looking at what art is currently soldfe, I habour some doubts if your expectation of creativeness, exploring totally new fields of imagination, boldy go where noone has gone before that you demand from our field is really the barrier that every artist has to face these days...

 

image.png.06770f9ae66cb36e36fc32be52f13622.png

image.png.659b1c16650fc79e545e55527b832bf7.png

image.png.8a99190038547b5f36f6a6f9167ae01d.png

image.thumb.png.cb5e3936375bd6a40e9c42e91953eb44.png

Edited by drstreit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I se

43 minutes ago, drstreit said:

And last sentence: As I like to visit the Basel ART each year, I habour some doubts if your expectation of creativeness, exploring totally new fields of imagination, boldy go where noone has gone before that you demand from our field is really the barrier that every artist has to face these days...

I stopped  visiting  things like that couple decades ago.   IMO it's just a visual  information  noise . I agree it's a kind of fan to create .  I instantly recall a nice smell of paint  from my old art school, a cool feeling of easy and limitless creative freedom .        But now I think  about it just that :  an information noise.

And where  AI  soon would be dominating  probably

 

Now try to do a good looking tree models for a mobile game.   From speed tree software for example, a best available.    Looks like crap , right . textures looks like crap too.

it's where you to  need your brain,  need to recollect all that boring  descriptive geometry courses , vector 3d math  and that short 3d graphics theory course  in  your art school   you thought you would never need in your  supposed glorious art career  etc.   

IMO it's where true creative and inventive power necessary and where AI wouldn't help you at all.  So far at least. 

   Years after  my most regret  is that I myself have paid not enough attention to all those  short  ancient geometry courses  in art school they considered one of  "free arts" .    My thoughts was  it's not I am going to use ancient Romans  mathematics and geometry  to build   Pantheon dome or something, neither  architecture was my specialty.    Surprisingly ,years after It turned out it's a knowledge I had a good use of ahead of anything else.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/15/2022 at 5:03 PM, drstreit said:

And with that type of software, the job of a grafic designer will change drastically: Have a look at https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/midjourney/?hl=de : These are all pictures created by "amateurs" with the help of AI - why would I pay a designer for that if AI can do it better, faster?

That's not graphic design. It's digital art, at most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kirk23 said:

Now try to do a good looking tree models for a mobile game.   From speed tree software for example, a best available.    Looks like crap , right . textures looks like crap too.

You refer to a very specific part of working with images - I would argue that a professional Speedtree modeller does indeed see him/herself as an artist and the outcome does sell...

So again: I don`t want to argue art here - I acknowldege that many visuabl products do sell across the industry - and I just ask for a VISION to allow Serif users stay on top of the curve here through integrating new tools into the Affinity suite. Can be through a vendor integration , can be through releaseng a SDK.

Preferrably the later - are there really vendors left that do not understand the power of user created content? Would have Photoshop ever reached its power without constantly people integrating it into their workflows or creating filters through their (pain to work with) SDK?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.