Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Files DNG files come in flat compared with JPG files. Further DNG and JPG have similar vibrancy when viewed in Windows Photo viewed. Please see attached file.

1. first picture is a screenshot of the DNG file in Windows Photo

2. Second picture is a screenshot of the JPG file in Windows Photo

3. Third picture is a screenshot of the DNG file in Affinity Photo - lacks vibrancy

4. Forth picture is a screenshot of the JPG file in Affinity Photo

 

Thanks

Stuart

Affinity Photo Raw Pentax k1 II issue.pdf

Posted

Hi Stuart,

welcome to the forum. What you observe is mostly by design.

The JPEG files are processed in Camera using certain settings, often sharpness, white balance, brightness, saturation.

Affinity only uses white balance and exposure, but ignores most other settings. This explains the different rendering.

Other Apps display either the embedded JPEG, or could interpret and apply all settings.

In Photo, you can apply the „missing“ adjustments in Photo persona, and save them even as presets for easy reuse.

 

In rare cases (new camera models), Affinity might be unable to correctly interpret RAW files. 

 

Mac mini M1 A2348 | MBP M3 

Windows 11 - AMD Ryzen 9 5900x - 32 GB RAM - Nvidia GTX 1080

LG34WK950U-W, calibrated to DCI-P3 with LG Calibration Studio / Spider 5 | Dell 27“ 4K

iPad Air Gen 5 (2022) A2589

Special interest into procedural texture filter, edit alpha channel, RGB/16 and RGB/32 color formats, stacking, finding root causes for misbehaving files, finding creative solutions for unsolvable tasks, finding bugs in Apps.

I use iPad screenshots and videos even in the Desktop section of the forum when I expect no relevant difference.

 

Posted

Hi @snarby97,

Welcome to the Affinity Forums :)

I can confirm as NotMyFault has mentioned above, this is expected behaviour when opening DNG files for RAW processing in Affinity.

When viewing the DNG file in Windows Photo Viewer, you aren't viewing the RAW file itself, it's actually previewing an embedded JPEG file which has already been processed by the camera.

When opening the DNG file in Affinity, we read the 'flat' RAW data, which has not had any adjustments applied to it - hence it looks 'washed out' in Affinity. This means you're able to use the Development and Photo Persona within Affinity Photo to adjust the tones in the image to your liking, rather than using the tone matched JPEG produced by the camera.

I hope this clears things up!

Posted
On 12/2/2021 at 1:36 AM, NotMyFault said:

Hi Stuart,

welcome to the forum. What you observe is mostly by design.

The JPEG files are processed in Camera using certain settings, often sharpness, white balance, brightness, saturation.

Affinity only uses white balance and exposure, but ignores most other settings. This explains the different rendering.

Other Apps display either the embedded JPEG, or could interpret and apply all settings.

In Photo, you can apply the „missing“ adjustments in Photo persona, and save them even as presets for easy reuse.

 

In rare cases (new camera models), Affinity might be unable to correctly interpret RAW files. 

 

Thankyou for your explanation. Do you know how to find out the jpg settings or is it trial and error in the photo persona?

Posted
23 hours ago, Dan C said:

Hi @snarby97,

Welcome to the Affinity Forums :)

I can confirm as NotMyFault has mentioned above, this is expected behaviour when opening DNG files for RAW processing in Affinity.

When viewing the DNG file in Windows Photo Viewer, you aren't viewing the RAW file itself, it's actually previewing an embedded JPEG file which has already been processed by the camera.

When opening the DNG file in Affinity, we read the 'flat' RAW data, which has not had any adjustments applied to it - hence it looks 'washed out' in Affinity. This means you're able to use the Development and Photo Persona within Affinity Photo to adjust the tones in the image to your liking, rather than using the tone matched JPEG produced by the camera.

I hope this clears things up!

Thanks for your help and explanation. Is it possible to apply the JPG settings to the DNG file. Ie can you determine what the jpeg settings are and apply them 

Posted
1 hour ago, snarby97 said:

Thankyou for your explanation. Do you know how to find out the jpg settings or is it trial and error in the photo persona?

With help of exiftool or other apps capable to extract all exif data. If you can upload an example RAW file, we can check.

Please note which settings you were using during capture. I thing almost every camera will display this if you inspect RAW images.

Jpeg images normally do not contain all this information, it depends on camera brand and settings in camera. For some cameras, it is adjustable what gets stored as exif metadata.

Mac mini M1 A2348 | MBP M3 

Windows 11 - AMD Ryzen 9 5900x - 32 GB RAM - Nvidia GTX 1080

LG34WK950U-W, calibrated to DCI-P3 with LG Calibration Studio / Spider 5 | Dell 27“ 4K

iPad Air Gen 5 (2022) A2589

Special interest into procedural texture filter, edit alpha channel, RGB/16 and RGB/32 color formats, stacking, finding root causes for misbehaving files, finding creative solutions for unsolvable tasks, finding bugs in Apps.

I use iPad screenshots and videos even in the Desktop section of the forum when I expect no relevant difference.

 

Posted
9 hours ago, NotMyFault said:

With help of exiftool or other apps capable to extract all exif data. If you can upload an example RAW file, we can check.

Please note which settings you were using during capture. I thing almost every camera will display this if you inspect RAW images.

Jpeg images normally do not contain all this information, it depends on camera brand and settings in camera. For some cameras, it is adjustable what gets stored as exif metadata.

Thanks. Please find file attached.

IMGP2133.DNG

Posted
13 minutes ago, snarby97 said:

Thanks. Please find file attached.

IMGP2133.DNG 52.01 MB · 0 downloads

Here some excerpts from the exif data (file attached):

I marked some orange which i assume are ignored by Affinity

ISO                             : 6400
Exposure Compensation           : 0
Metering Mode                   : Multi-segment
Auto Bracketing                 : 0 EV, No Extended Bracket
White Balance                   : Auto
Saturation                      : 0 (normal)
Contrast                        : +1 (medium high)
Sharpness                       : +1 (medium hard)

Baseline Exposure               : -0.5932617188
 

Default Crop Origin             : 8 10
Default Crop Size               : 7360 4912

The image opens in Photo severely overexposed. If i reduce exposure by -0.6 (rounded) it looks ok.

IMGP2133.txt

Mac mini M1 A2348 | MBP M3 

Windows 11 - AMD Ryzen 9 5900x - 32 GB RAM - Nvidia GTX 1080

LG34WK950U-W, calibrated to DCI-P3 with LG Calibration Studio / Spider 5 | Dell 27“ 4K

iPad Air Gen 5 (2022) A2589

Special interest into procedural texture filter, edit alpha channel, RGB/16 and RGB/32 color formats, stacking, finding root causes for misbehaving files, finding creative solutions for unsolvable tasks, finding bugs in Apps.

I use iPad screenshots and videos even in the Desktop section of the forum when I expect no relevant difference.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, NotMyFault said:

Here some excerpts from the exif data (file attached):

I marked some orange which i assume are ignored by Affinity

ISO                             : 6400
Exposure Compensation           : 0
Metering Mode                   : Multi-segment
Auto Bracketing                 : 0 EV, No Extended Bracket
White Balance                   : Auto
Saturation                      : 0 (normal)
Contrast                        : +1 (medium high)
Sharpness                       : +1 (medium hard)

Baseline Exposure               : -0.5932617188
 

Default Crop Origin             : 8 10
Default Crop Size               : 7360 4912

The image opens in Photo severely overexposed. If i reduce exposure by -0.6 (rounded) it looks ok.

IMGP2133.txt 33.53 kB · 0 downloads

Thankyou

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.