3d illusions Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 Every time I want to do something straightforward, it doesn't work as expected, and I have to search the internet to find a solution. I've been unable to quickly find a solution to Affinity's latest bizarre refusal to work logically. Here's what I'm trying to do. copy one layer into a mask layer. I though it would just be a case of click the layer to copy, select all, copy (tried both ctrl c and copy flattened), then right click on the mask layer and choose 'edit mask', then paste..........Nope, doesn't like it...it's completely nonsensical. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Affinity, if you're listening, for the love of all that is holy, PLEASE make your software intuitive. cy2, SnapArtboardsToPixels, sbe and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulEC Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 When you say "copy one layer into a mask layer" do you mean that you want to use the layer as a mask? If so: Layer - Rasterise to Mask, to convert it to a mask, rather than trying to paste it into an existing mask. RNKLN and Callum 2 Quote Acer XC-895 : Core i5-10400 Hexa-core 2.90 GHz : 32GB RAM : Intel UHD Graphics 630 : Windows 10 Home Affinity Publisher 2 : Affinity Photo 2 : Affinity Designer 2 : (latest release versions) on desktop and iPad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wosven Posted October 25, 2021 Share Posted October 25, 2021 Probably this or the usual method consisiting in copying part of an image by doing a selection and pasting is as easily on a mask (that can have been already worked on) that we would paste it on another layer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fde101 Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 When you paste copied data into Photo it becomes a new layer, it doesn't paste into an existing layer, so that one piece of this at least is consistent and intuitive. However, it seems to be just about impossible to merge two mask layers. That should definitely be addressed. It is also a pain to convert a mask layer to a pixel layer to make it easier to manipulate. So far the only way I see to do that is to fill a new pixel layer with white, move the mask to be a mask of that layer, and rasterize the layer to apply the mask to it. Once the mask becomes a pixel layer it can be merged with other layers and used as a mask directly (without needing to convert it back to a mask layer). This is one of the reasons I generally don't use mask layers. A pixel layer is much easier to work with and can do the same job without the hassle. CLC 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walt.farrell Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 1 hour ago, fde101 said: It is also a pain to convert a mask layer to a pixel layer to make it easier to manipulate. Select the mask layer in the Layers panel, right-click, and Release Mask doesn't work for you? Quote -- Walt Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases PC: Desktop: Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Laptop: Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU. iPad: iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 17.4.1, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard Mac: 2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sonoma 14.4.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fde101 Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 2 minutes ago, walt.farrell said: Select the mask layer in the Layers panel, right-click, and Release Mask doesn't work for you? That option moves the mask layer out from underneath the layer it is a mask for, but it is still a mask layer, not a pixel layer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3d illusions Posted October 26, 2021 Author Share Posted October 26, 2021 2 hours ago, fde101 said: When you paste copied data into Photo it becomes a new layer, it doesn't paste into an existing layer, so that one piece of this at least is consistent and intuitive. It's consistently unintuitive perhaps What is paste inside for if it's not to paste inside a layer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fde101 Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 1 minute ago, 3d illusions said: What is paste inside for if it's not to paste inside a layer? It actually does - as a child of the layer, not as part of its content. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3d illusions Posted October 26, 2021 Author Share Posted October 26, 2021 So basically the answer is, you cant paste into a mask. I'm guessing if you want to combine masks you cant, and you have to have an endless number of masks instead. How do I convert a mask to pixels? I though perhaps as rasterize to mask turned pixels data to mask data, then rasterize would turn it back to pixel data........nope. And what's the logic behind needing mask data and pixel data....couldn't pixel data suffice for both? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3d illusions Posted October 26, 2021 Author Share Posted October 26, 2021 I mean, in this video I have absolutely no idea what's happening. The red layer is showing as gray in the layers panel (second from the bottom). The masks above that layer seem to mask the red layer, even though they're above it.....can anyone explain this, or is it just time to boycott the software and put it down to a not so expensive lesson to never buy cheap? 2021-10-26 14-54-31.mp4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfred Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 8 minutes ago, 3d illusions said: The masks above that layer seem to mask the red layer, even though they're above it..... Just like filter layers and adjustment layers, mask layers affect everything below. In all cases you can group the layers or nest the mask/adjustment/filter to the target layer if you want restrict its scope. Quote Alfred Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for Windows • Windows 10 Home/Pro Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for iPad • iPadOS 17.4.1 (iPad 7th gen) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carl123 Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 35 minutes ago, 3d illusions said: How do I convert a mask to pixels? If I understand you correctly 1. Select the Mask layer 2. In Channels panel, right-click Mask Alpha 3. Select Create Greyscale Layer Alfred 1 Quote To save time I am currently using an automated AI to reply to some posts on this forum. If any of "my" posts are wrong or appear to be total b*ll*cks they are the ones generated by the AI. If correct they were probably mine. I apologise for any mistakes made by my AI - I'm sure it will improve with time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3d illusions Posted October 26, 2021 Author Share Posted October 26, 2021 2 minutes ago, carl123 said: If I understand you correctly 1. Select the Mask layer 2. In Channels panel, right-click Mask Alpha 3. Select Create Greyscale Layer Wouldn't it make more sense for rasterize layer to do this? It's a given that it's going to be grayscale.......or are you telling me we have pixels layers, mask layers, and grayscale layers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walt.farrell Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 1 hour ago, fde101 said: That option moves the mask layer out from underneath the layer it is a mask for, but it is still a mask layer, not a pixel layer. Good point. Thanks. Quote -- Walt Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases PC: Desktop: Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Laptop: Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU. iPad: iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 17.4.1, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard Mac: 2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sonoma 14.4.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carl123 Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 3 minutes ago, 3d illusions said: Wouldn't it make more sense for rasterize layer to do this? It's a given that it's going to be grayscale.......or are you telling me we have pixels layers, mask layers, and grayscale layers? Personally, I would have started that sentence with "Thanks, " but I guess that's just me. Hokusai and user_0815 2 Quote To save time I am currently using an automated AI to reply to some posts on this forum. If any of "my" posts are wrong or appear to be total b*ll*cks they are the ones generated by the AI. If correct they were probably mine. I apologise for any mistakes made by my AI - I'm sure it will improve with time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3d illusions Posted October 26, 2021 Author Share Posted October 26, 2021 Why doesn't the layers panel always show the content of the layer in the thumbnail, and also why is it so sloooow to paint into the layer after converting from mask? 2021-10-26 15-28-49.mp4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3d illusions Posted October 26, 2021 Author Share Posted October 26, 2021 1 minute ago, carl123 said: Personally, I would have started that sentence with "Thanks, " but I guess that's just me. Sorry to have forgotten my manners. Thanks for taking the time to answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fde101 Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 30 minutes ago, 3d illusions said: Wouldn't it make more sense for rasterize layer to do this? Absolutely, and I believe it should. Sadly, it does not. It rasterizes the mask layer back into a mask layer, which is not even remotely helpful. telemax 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
telemax Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 1 hour ago, 3d illusions said: So basically the answer is, you cant paste into a mask. I'm guessing if you want to combine masks you cant, and you have to have an endless number of masks instead. How do I convert a mask to pixels? I though perhaps as rasterize to mask turned pixels data to mask data, then rasterize would turn it back to pixel data........nope. And what's the logic behind needing mask data and pixel data....couldn't pixel data suffice for both? I like to use a normal layer as a mask, without any restrictions. A group of layers can make a composite mask, and you get full creative freedom. Quote Non-destructive Mask https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/topic/150439-non-destructive-mask/Image layer & Pixel layer https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/topic/146720-image-layer-and-pixel-layer/Brushes | Stars https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/topic/135202-brushes-stars/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3d illusions Posted October 26, 2021 Author Share Posted October 26, 2021 thanks, telemax, that's the ideal solution, infact I don't see any point in having a mask layer, this is much better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prophet Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 16 minutes ago, telemax said: I like to use a normal layer as a mask I love this technique and I'm toying with making this my new workflow. It does solve a few of the mask layer headaches Affinity is prone to, but a big disadvantage is editing the "mask" in b&w only mode. With a regular mask, a quick Option+click on the layer gives me b&w only. The new way, I have to reset the blend range and erase to see b&w only. Too many steps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3d illusions Posted October 26, 2021 Author Share Posted October 26, 2021 4 minutes ago, prophet said: I love this technique and I'm toying with making this my new workflow. It does solve a few of the mask layer headaches Affinity is prone to, but a big disadvantage is editing the "mask" in b&w only mode. With a regular mask, a quick Option+click on the layer gives me b&w only. The new way, I have to reset the blend range and erase to see b&w only. Too many steps. stick a black and white adjustment on the 'mask' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3d illusions Posted October 26, 2021 Author Share Posted October 26, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prophet Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 2 minutes ago, 3d illusions said: stick a black and white adjustment on the 'mask' Hmmmm, I'm not seeing how that can quickly present me with a way to see the "mask" as b&w only. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
telemax Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 14 hours ago, prophet said: With a regular mask, a quick Option+click on the layer gives me b&w only. The new way, I have to reset the blend range and erase to see b&w only. Too many steps. In that case, I would use groups. Mask-Group.afphoto Mask-Group.mp4 Quote Non-destructive Mask https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/topic/150439-non-destructive-mask/Image layer & Pixel layer https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/topic/146720-image-layer-and-pixel-layer/Brushes | Stars https://forum.affinity.serif.com/index.php?/topic/135202-brushes-stars/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.