Annehouw Posted August 18, 2021 Posted August 18, 2021 (edited) I am starting the investigation to migrate my workflow from PS to AP. Most things are more or less in line, but I have come to an essential workflow element that is so inefficient in AP that I am wondering if I am doing it completely wrong. Any suggestions are very welcome! Let me explain: Retouching on a gradient is hard to do. One of the tricks in my toolbox is to replace that part of the image with a gradient fill based on end-colors picked from that segment of the image itself. The workflow in PS is as follows: Make new empty layer Define the selection Set the background color to one end of the selection Set the foreground color the other end of the selection Select the gradient tool Draw the gradient Mask and blend with soft brush Add a bit of noise In Affinity Photo I have found no quicker way than doing it as below Define the selection New fill layer Change type from solid to linear Activate the move tool Move selection out of the way (as it blocks the area I want to pick colors from) Activate the gradient fill tool Click on the color bar With the first end point selected, click on a color bar again Pick the color from my image Activate the other gradient end point Click on color Pick the second color from my image Select the move tool Move the selection back into place Reselect the gradient fill tool Draw the gradient Mask and blend with soft brush Add a bit of noise That is a lot more effort! I have tried, but failed, to get fill and gradient tools to open up with my selected background and foreground colors as end points: Fill layer starts with the background color and changes to a luminosity range of this same color when choosing linear fill The Gradient Tool starts with black and white by default. Edited August 18, 2021 by Annehouw Quote
NotMyFault Posted August 18, 2021 Posted August 18, 2021 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Annehouw said: Activate the move tool Move selection out of the way (as it blocks the area I want to pick colors from) Activate the gradient fill tool Hi, agree that gradient UI is a bit overly complex. what do you mean by step 5? Normally you move layers and not selections. You can just deactivate the fill layer to samples colors beneath. This will make at least 4 steps redundant. Why not draw the gradient directly after step 2? May watch the tutorial about divide, showing a better sequence for color sampling to fill layers. https://youtu.be/Ldwx_wG4X6c You could speed up creating gradients by saving and using swatches, to use any pre-defined colors you want. Edited August 18, 2021 by NotMyFault Added link to tutorial Quote Mac mini M1 A2348 | MBP M3 Windows 11 - AMD Ryzen 9 5900x - 32 GB RAM - Nvidia GTX 1080 LG34WK950U-W, calibrated to DCI-P3 with LG Calibration Studio / Spider 5 | Dell 27“ 4K iPad Air Gen 5 (2022) A2589 Special interest into procedural texture filter, edit alpha channel, RGB/16 and RGB/32 color formats, stacking, finding root causes for misbehaving files, finding creative solutions for unsolvable tasks, finding bugs in Apps. I use iPad screenshots and videos even in the Desktop section of the forum when I expect no relevant difference.
Annehouw Posted August 18, 2021 Author Posted August 18, 2021 (edited) Hi NotMyFault, Thanks for this superquick reply! Much appreciated. In step 5, I indeed move the layer (partially filled because of my selection earlier). Deactivating the layer and picking the colors indeed is a good trick and there I the tutorial is a good pointer as well to quickly change one color in the gradient. However, this still gives me a monochromatic fill layer. In my use cases, there not only is a luminosity change but als a hue change across the gradient. So then I will need to go into the fill menu to change the end hue. (But see the shorter workflow based on your suggestions below). I have thought about the swatches, but since this is a retouching effort based upon what is in the image, no gradient is the same twice. Ever. "Why not draw the gradient directly after step 2?": I do not know if I understand what you are saying here. Maybe this? Define the selection Sample a color as my background color Add a fill layer Select the Gradient Tool (which now has one correct sampled color at one of its ends) Drag to create a linear fill Deactivate the fill layer Sample my second color from the image with the color picker giving me the other sampled color at the other end of the gradient Re-active the fill layer Reposition the handles (and possibly mid point) to get the color gradient to match the surrounding area Mask and blend Add noise That indeed saves 7 steps already! Thank you. Edited August 18, 2021 by Annehouw NotMyFault 1 Quote
Wosven Posted August 18, 2021 Posted August 18, 2021 Why not: definitely add a shortcut to "Add fill layer", "Show" (Layer), Hide" (Layer) and: Select an area ("L" + selection) Add a fill layer (shortcut) Unselect (ctrl+D) Hide layer (shortcut) "G" for gradient Tool Alt+Click on the image for the first color Draw gradient Alt+Click second color Display layer (shortcut) NotMyFault 1 Quote
Annehouw Posted August 18, 2021 Author Posted August 18, 2021 @Wosven' Some great suggestions. I did the sequence you wrote down (without the shortcuts for the moment) and that works as well. I need to rewire my muscle memory but that will be OK. Thanks! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.