ABHULtheELF Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 Does anyone have any insight regarding which fonts work better as substitutes for Helvetica and/or Helvetica Neue on Affinity Designer projects primarily viewed as PDF presentations on PC and Mac system screens, but sometimes also for standard printing? FYI, my system is MacBook Pro running OSX 11.2.3 Big Sur. FontAgentPro is my font handling app. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfred Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 What is the (potential) problem with Helvetica that has prompted you to look for a substitute? Oval, lacerto and thomaso 3 Quote Alfred Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for Windows • Windows 10 Home/Pro Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for iPad • iPadOS 17.4.1 (iPad 7th gen) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
v_kyr Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 10 inspired alternatives to Helvetica Top 10 Helvetica Alternatives 17 Modern Alternatives to Helvetica for Designers Alternative Typefaces to Helvetica Is there a free 'Helvetica Neue' alternative? ... etc. ... Quote ☛ Affinity Designer 1.10.8 ◆ Affinity Photo 1.10.8 ◆ Affinity Publisher 1.10.8 ◆ OSX El Capitan ☛ Affinity V2.3 apps ◆ MacOS Sonoma 14.2 ◆ iPad OS 17.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loukash Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 4 hours ago, ABHULtheELF said: which fonts work better as substitutes for Helvetica and/or Helvetica Neue on Affinity Designer projects primarily viewed as PDF presentations on PC and Mac system screens, but sometimes also for standard printing? The one font which your typographical eye likes the best. As for my own eye, I've always loved Univers, ever since the art school. We had a Diatype typesetter in the class room, and a few Univers disks were included. We also had piles of preprinted Lorem Ipsum sheets typeset in Univers in various sizes. Thus I became irreversibly indoctrinated. Quote MacBookAir 15": MacOS Ventura > Affinity v1, v2, v2 beta // MacBookPro 15" mid-2012: MacOS El Capitan > Affinity v1 / MacOS Catalina > Affinity v1, v2, v2 beta // iPad 8th: iPadOS 16 > Affinity v2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lacerto Posted March 26, 2021 Share Posted March 26, 2021 (...) user_0815 and Fixx 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RNKLN Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 Let's not forget Arial. 😀 Quote Affinity Photo - Affinity Designer - Affinity Publisher | macOS Sonoma (14.2) on 16GB MBP14 2021 with 2.4 versions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lacerto Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 (...) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loukash Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 26 minutes ago, RNKLN said: Let's not forget Arial. Hey, I've already put users on "ignore" for less! In other words:No, please FORGET Arial! That said… No, not totally: 23 minutes ago, Lagarto said: This really depends on the intended usage Exactly. Back in the day Arial was deliberately optimized for CRT display readability at small sizes, and it did an excellent job at that, way better than Helvetica. At least on classic Mac OS of the 1990s. OS X changed the game forever though. I still use Arial internally sometimes, for example in my FileMaker databases for fields and field labels at small sizes like 9-11 pt. On my non-retina displays it's still more readable than Helvetica or others, with the exception of the brilliantly optimized-for-OS-X Lucida Grande at 9 pt. The latter lacks italic, however. RNKLN 1 Quote MacBookAir 15": MacOS Ventura > Affinity v1, v2, v2 beta // MacBookPro 15" mid-2012: MacOS El Capitan > Affinity v1 / MacOS Catalina > Affinity v1, v2, v2 beta // iPad 8th: iPadOS 16 > Affinity v2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaffeeundsalz Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 Looking at what others have done, Comic Sans seems to be a reasonable alternative. RNKLN, 000, user_0815 and 2 others 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lacerto Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 (,,,) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaffeeundsalz Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 20 minutes ago, Lagarto said: I think both are fonts that people love to hate, no doubt partly because they are (or used to be) so common. In case you don't already know, there's a very interesting read about this: https://designforhackers.com/blog/comic-sans-hate/ Alfred 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy05 Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 There's one thing about comic sans which lots of people don't know actually: It's one of the best fonts in terms of legibility for people with dyslexia. And unlike some special fonts for this matter (i. e. open dyslexic) it's widely available as per standard on a lot of systems. So, especially for use in schools it's not the worst choice for a teacher to use comic sans. Quote »A designer's job is to improve the general quality of life. In fact, it's the only reason for our existence.«Paul Rand (1914-1996) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfred Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 4 minutes ago, Andy05 said: There's one thing about comic sans which lots of people don't know actually: It's one of the best fonts in terms of legibility for people with dyslexia. Trebuchet MS has good legibility for people with dyslexia, and (in my opinion) it’s much more elegant. Quote Alfred Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for Windows • Windows 10 Home/Pro Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for iPad • iPadOS 17.4.1 (iPad 7th gen) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomaso Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 22 hours ago, ABHULtheELF said: primarily viewed as PDF presentations on PC and Mac system screens That would make me focus on fonts with an especially good readability on screens. Even though this subject has been a lot more important a few decades ago when monitor pixels were larger and resolution much lower than nowadays, the readability is a valuable aspect. The nicest font face set in gray text in an extra light weight may meant to appear elegant (subtle, modest, restrained) from the designers point of view but may prevent others from starting to read. There were many articles written about readability and fonts … e.g. https://medium.com/productivity-revolution/10-best-fonts-for-improving-reading-experience-6171ce199e97https://thrive.design/best-fonts-for-reading-easiest-to-read-online-design-fonts/https://people.dsv.su.se/~jpalme/internet-course/font-report.htmlhttps://www.nngroup.com/search/?q=readability+font Quote macOS 10.14.6 | MacBookPro Retina 15" | Eizo 27" | Affinity V1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy05 Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 43 minutes ago, Alfred said: Trebuchet MS has good legibility for people with dyslexia, and (in my opinion) it’s much more elegant. I've done some design and layout work for a client in Australia, who published books for children with dyslexia. First choice was open dislexic as font for obvious reasons. But comic sans was tested as the most useful and most helpful font among all those, which are available when installing MS Windows. Maybe that's different for adults, but when we tested fonts with children (up to 14 years old), comic sans beat all other "windows fonts" by far. Alfred 1 Quote »A designer's job is to improve the general quality of life. In fact, it's the only reason for our existence.«Paul Rand (1914-1996) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaffeeundsalz Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 20 minutes ago, Andy05 said: First choice was open dislexic as font for obvious reasons. But comic sans was tested as the most useful and most helpful font among all those, which are available when installing MS Windows. So Comic Sans won against OpenDyslexic? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfred Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 What Did Garamond Do to Deserve a D.C. Court’s Wrath? Quote Alfred Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for Windows • Windows 10 Home/Pro Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for iPad • iPadOS 17.4.1 (iPad 7th gen) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixx Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 6 hours ago, kaffeeundsalz said: Looking at what others have done, Comic Sans seems to be a reasonable alternative. Now I would say most pressing question is What is Best Font Substitute for Comic Sans? kaffeeundsalz 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
v_kyr Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 What one the font Guru's tells about Helvetica ... Erik Spiekermann-Helvetica Kinetic Type Erik Spiekerman on Microsoft and Arial Helvetica documentary clip - Erik Spiekermann ... or ... What is Killing Helvetica (*) Quote ☛ Affinity Designer 1.10.8 ◆ Affinity Photo 1.10.8 ◆ Affinity Publisher 1.10.8 ◆ OSX El Capitan ☛ Affinity V2.3 apps ◆ MacOS Sonoma 14.2 ◆ iPad OS 17.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
user_0815 Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 Univers is indeed one of the beautiful ones. Also Frutiger is a classic. What I discovered a while back are the two similar ones "TT Interphases" and "Inter". Both of them were developed to be good on screens as an average design of good modern fonts iirc. I use Inter for a lot of things including print. It looks similar to Apple's system font San Francisco. But it might need manual letter spacing to look attractive in some situations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy05 Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 37 minutes ago, kaffeeundsalz said: So Comic Sans won against OpenDyslexic? No, OpenDyslexic won with ease. Hands down. But we had to test fonts which are commonly available without the need to install OpenDyslexic. Even though latter is open source, most schools don't allow the installation of own fonts. Hence, the test with "common" fonts as well. What I learned is that a font seems to need some "uniqueness" to each individual char. I. e. "b" and "d" can't be just mirrored, nor can b and q look alike, just rotated by 180°. Sometimes, just a variation of the thickness of one of the lines (i. e. the upper half of the "b" vs. bottom half of "d") already helped the kids massively. Often, single letters seem to get shifted around, flipped horizontally or vertically, mirrored etc. I've been told, that that's what sometimes happens at least to some people with dyslexia. So, even if the brain is messing around by flipping the letters, there's still something to differ. And that seems to help. Disclaimer: I'm by no means any expert in this matter. But that's what I just observed by following the procedures during the tests made. kaffeeundsalz 1 Quote »A designer's job is to improve the general quality of life. In fact, it's the only reason for our existence.«Paul Rand (1914-1996) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeW Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 33 minutes ago, Fixx said: Now I would say most pressing question is What is Best Font Substitute for Comic Sans? http://comicneue.com Fixx and thomaso 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfred Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 19 minutes ago, Andy05 said: the upper half of the "b" vs. bottom half of "d" Aren’t the characters in Open Dyslexic heavier at the bottom than the top? That would help with “b” and “p” which are mirrored vertically, but it isn’t obvious how it would help with “b” and “d”. Quote Alfred Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for Windows • Windows 10 Home/Pro Affinity Designer/Photo/Publisher 2 for iPad • iPadOS 17.4.1 (iPad 7th gen) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walt.farrell Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 30 minutes ago, Alfred said: Aren’t the characters in Open Dyslexic heavier at the bottom than the top? That would help with “b” and “p” which are mirrored vertically, but it isn’t obvious how it would help with “b” and “d”. The "d" also has a bit of a tail that the "b" doesn't have. Perhaps that's part of what helps distinguish them? Alfred 1 Quote -- Walt Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases PC: Desktop: Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Laptop: Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU. iPad: iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 17.4.1, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard Mac: 2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sonoma 14.4.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy05 Posted March 27, 2021 Share Posted March 27, 2021 4 minutes ago, walt.farrell said: The "d" also has a bit of a tail that the "b" doesn't have. Perhaps that's part of what helps distinguish them? Yeah. Main aspect was (as far as I understood), that you can't put two different letters onto each other with a congruent shape. No matter whether mirrored horizontally or vertically, rotated or any combination of that. Even slight differences (like the tiny tail you mentioned) seem to make a big difference for legibility. I might have confused in my example a different "dyslexic font" we tested back then. But that failed in the tests. This font is indeed "heavier" at the bottom like Alfred said. Maybe that's what make it easier for a person with dyslexia to recognise bottom and top of a letter. It's quite some years ago that I have last worked with that customer and haven't dug deep into the dyslexic matters since. What I still remember is some kids being capable of reading a whole page in minutes, which took literally 10+ times longer when using a font like Helvetica or Times New Roman. Alfred 1 Quote »A designer's job is to improve the general quality of life. In fact, it's the only reason for our existence.«Paul Rand (1914-1996) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.