Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For headings in my opinion it is absolutly necessary to keep it with the NEXT paragraph. But there is only the setting "Keep with PREVIOUS paragraph". To set all the first paragraphs after the heading with "keep previous" is for me the wrong way.

Thanks,

Uli

Posted

In your Paragraph text style for the heading, try the Flow Option "Keep with next ... lines".  Setting it to "1" seems to work for me.

image.png.c1f6a6c0732ab43f7a62bf13324caf83.png

-- Walt
Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases
PC:
    Desktop:  Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 

    Laptop:  Windows 11 Pro 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU.
    Laptop 2: Windows 11 Pro 24H2,  16GB memory, Snapdragon(R) X Elite - X1E80100 - Qualcomm(R) Oryon(TM) 12 Core CPU 4.01 GHz, Qualcomm(R) Adreno(TM) X1-85 GPU
iPad:  iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 18.5, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard 
Mac:  2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sequoia 15.5

Posted

That was it, thanks!

Sorry for my stupid question, but it is my first publication with Affinity Publisher (after more than 25 years with other programs). I have to train my eyes to find all the settings in this new program.

Posted

@walt.farrellThat seems to beg the question why the complementary option is not  "Keep with previous X lines", or at least why the forward and reverse adjacent-paragraph-keep-with properties are not  symmetric.

Where is @Jowday ?

Perhaps due to my familiarity with other applications, I am accustomed to thinking of this as "keep with next paragraph" and it's a property I routinely set on header paragraph styles.

I am also used to being able to set multi-line thresholds for orphan and widow avoidances.  AffPub always uses an implicit threshold of one line.

Posted
2 hours ago, sfriedberg said:

@walt.farrellThat seems to beg the question why the complementary option is not  "Keep with previous X lines", or at least why the forward and reverse adjacent-paragraph-keep-with properties are not  symmetric.

Where is @Jowday ?

Perhaps due to my familiarity with other applications, I am accustomed to thinking of this as "keep with next paragraph" and it's a property I routinely set on header paragraph styles.

I am also used to being able to set multi-line thresholds for orphan and widow avoidances.  AffPub always uses an implicit threshold of one line.

This time Serif actually left PagePlus' breaks options behind and mimicked InDesign a bit (ignore red rectangle) but didn't organize and communicate it as well as Adobe. The usual chaotic order and Keep, prevent, keep, prevent, keep. 

I think Serif made the wise choice to adapt to more serious use cases and customers than with PagePlus. Keep with previous suits me well personally. Without support in Publisher for cross references especially I will not get the chance to try it out in production and big documents to see how well it works in practice and different or same styles and style variations. Personally I believe keep with previous + keep with next x lines is targeting real life issues and solutions so I am in theory... satisfied.

Interested to see where it all goes. I think Serif is massively loosing control of simplicity in the user interface in Publisher almost from initial take off and flow options are important. Folding and collapsing paragraph studio/panel with tired eyes (or even fresh eyes) is not a great experience and I hope the flow options will be modified and improved a bit. 

image.png.e4ae3788506b137492d87786c20d4d74.png

InDesign: Keep paragraph (with forced line break) together across pages -  Graphic Design Stack Exchange  

More here:

 

  • "The user interface is supposed to work for me - I am not supposed to work for the user interface."
  • Computer-, operating system- and software agnostic; I am a result oriented professional. Look for a fanboy somewhere else.
  • “When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger.” ― Confucius
  • Not an Affinity user og forum user anymore. The software continued to disappoint and not deliver.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.