Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Blurry images when decreasing size?


Recommended Posts

Hi,

Just made the switch from Photoshop (basic user) and QuarkXpress to Affinity Photo and Publisher. Love the apps!

However there is one thing that I can't seem to figure out even after searching the forums. When I decrease the pixel size of an image, the image gets blurry. I don't know why that is. In Photoshop I've never experienced this.

Here is what I did:

- I took a picture of 96 dpi, 568 x 168 pxiels
- Resized it to 72 dpi, 300 x 89 pixels, resample bilinear
- Save it as JPG at 80% quality

I have enclosed a picture with the results. The non-resized images look about the same for Affinity (left) and Photoshop (right) but the smaller icon by Affinity definitely looks a bit less sharp.

Does anyone have an idea about what I am doing wrong?

Thanks!

Marco

Icons.png

Edited by MarcoJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello @MarcoJ and welcome to the forums.

When making judgements on sharpness, you should always view your image at 100% zoom. Did you do this?

John

Windows 10, Affinity Photo 1.10.5 Designer 1.10.5 and Publisher 1.10.5 (mainly Photo), now ex-Adobe CC

CPU: AMD A6-3670. RAM: 16 GB DDR3 @ 666MHz, Graphics: 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, MarcoJ said:

Yes, the images are all 100% zoom. If you download the image and open it at 100% that will be the exact size. 

To my (ancient) eyes, your two images look the same. You could try a different scaling algorithm, such as Lanczos. Or you could add a little sharpening.

EDIT: I have been advised that Lanczos is not recommended for downsizing

John

Windows 10, Affinity Photo 1.10.5 Designer 1.10.5 and Publisher 1.10.5 (mainly Photo), now ex-Adobe CC

CPU: AMD A6-3670. RAM: 16 GB DDR3 @ 666MHz, Graphics: 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GT 630

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks John. Yes, I was told that bilinear is the best method for downsizing.

I have added a zoomed in image of both versions, the Affinity Photo render on the left side and Photoshop on the right. You probably will see the difference here. In Affinity I am definitely missing the clarity that I get in Photoshop. Sure I could sharpen each image after scaling it down, but I hoped Affinity Photo would do an equal quality job out of the box like Photoshop.

Marco

AP-PS.png

Edited by MarcoJ
Typos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your answer Bruce. Not sure what 'pixel aligned' means in this situation. (As said, I'm just a basic user and unfortunately so is my knowledge about these definitions.) I just downsized a JPG image. How do I 'pixel align' this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MarcoJ said:

How do I 'pixel align' this?

Check the Transform tab and for all 4 values of X,Y and W,H make sure they are all integer values and have no decimals

If they have decimals just round up/down the value and type it into the relevant box

To save time I am currently using an automated AI to reply to some posts on this forum. If any of "my" posts are wrong or appear to be total b*ll*cks they are the ones generated by the AI. If correct they were probably mine. I apologise for any mistakes made by my AI - I'm sure it will improve with time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@carl123 - Thanks, I checked and they all have integer values so indeed no decimals.

@PaoloT - I have tried Lanczos (separable) and you are right. That resulted in a sharper image. With the non-separable version the image became a little too jaggy, so I will use Lanczos  separable for downsizing.

Thanks everyone for your help!

Edited by MarcoJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/1/2021 at 6:22 PM, MarcoJ said:

I have tried Lanczos (separable) and you are right. That resulted in a sharper image. With the non-separable version the image became a little too jaggy, so I will use Lanczos  separable for downsizing.

I've just done some other down-resizing (printed and handwritten text, black ink on white paper), and the Lanczos (non-separable) option was the most faithful to the original. I would say perfect. The correct option probably varies depending on the original image. This is the same with Photoshop, even if I find the default option in AfPhoto (Bilinear) the one working the worse with my materials.

Paolo

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.