Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Live Filter Performance in Photo and Designer (Persona)


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

I first noticed this in Affinity Publisher when switching between different personas. Live filters seem to have a much better performance in the Photo persona. With The Unsharp Mask filter for example, images update immediately when moving the sliders, making for a very smooth experience. In the other personas, screen update lags when I try this. Now, performance is not at all that bad; all personas are perfectly useable. But the difference is very noticeable.

On further examining the issue, I could also see the same behavior when comparing the standalone versions of Photo and Designer, although my (very subjective) observation is that the difference in performance might be slightly less obvious than in the Publisher personas. The rendering settings in Preferences > Performance are configured identically on my machine for all three applications. Is this expected? Can anyone reproduce? Is there a technical difference in how Photo, Designer and Publisher render Live Filters?

Cheers
kaffeeundsalz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 10/15/2020 at 10:37 AM, kaffeeundsalz said:

Is there a technical difference in how Photo, Designer and Publisher render Live Filters?

Apparently there may be no difference in "how" live filters are rendered (I assume they will be the same functions/code), but rather it will depend on what else needs to be done at the same time in the given application/personas. Although even that this could/should be completely identical due to the unified concept of Affinity Suite applications.

Affinity Store (MSI/EXE): Affinity Suite (ADe, APh, APu) 2.4.0.2301
Dell OptiPlex 7060, i5-8500 3.00 GHz, 16 GB, Intel UHD Graphics 630, Dell P2417H 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Dell Latitude E5570, i5-6440HQ 2.60 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics 530, 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Intel NUC5PGYH, Pentium N3700 2.40 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics, EIZO EV2456 1920 x 1200, Windows 10 Pro, Version 21H1, Build 19043.2130.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One difference between Designer and Photo is that Designer supports additional View Modes of Vector and Outline, vs Photo which supports only the Pixel View Mode.

You might try using View > View Mode to switch the Designer Persona (or Designer) to Pixel mode, and see if that makes a difference in the screen rendering speed.

-- Walt
Designer, Photo, and Publisher V1 and V2 at latest retail and beta releases
PC:
    Desktop:  Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 64GB memory, AMD Ryzen 9 5900 12-Core @ 3.00 GHz, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 

    Laptop:  Windows 11 Pro, version 23H2, 32GB memory, Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz, Intel UHD Graphics Comet Lake GT2 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU.
iPad:  iPad Pro M1, 12.9": iPadOS 17.4.1, Apple Pencil 2, Magic Keyboard 
Mac:  2023 M2 MacBook Air 15", 16GB memory, macOS Sonoma 14.4.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, walt.farrell said:

One difference between Designer and Photo is that Designer supports additional View Modes of Vector

This could be a major difference, as "vector" rendering ( ADesigner and APublisher) will be more computationally intensive.

Affinity Store (MSI/EXE): Affinity Suite (ADe, APh, APu) 2.4.0.2301
Dell OptiPlex 7060, i5-8500 3.00 GHz, 16 GB, Intel UHD Graphics 630, Dell P2417H 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Dell Latitude E5570, i5-6440HQ 2.60 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics 530, 1920 x 1080, Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3155.
Intel NUC5PGYH, Pentium N3700 2.40 GHz, 8 GB, Intel HD Graphics, EIZO EV2456 1920 x 1200, Windows 10 Pro, Version 21H1, Build 19043.2130.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.