DeepDesertPhoto Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 I was working an HDR image that looks perfectly fine in 32 bit HDR but when I convert it to 16 bit LAB or 8 bit RGB I am getting a banding problem. My banding problem is occurring in a storm photo I took in which I combined 3 exposures in 32 bit HDR. The banding appears in the smoother areas of the dark clouds in the photo. Like I said this banding is not visible with the original AP document that is in 32 bit HDR. The banding is only noticeable when converted to a 16 bit LAB color TIF file or an 8 bit RGB JPEG. I did not have this problem with the last version of AP so I am wondering if it is a problem with the way the newer version of AP is converting the image to the other formats I use. I am including the JPG version that has the banding. The only way I have been able to fix this is by lightening the tones of the clouds where the banding occurs, but that ruins the HDR toning, so I hope there is a fix because I do a lot of HDR photography. I am using the latest version of AP (1.8.4) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Rostron Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 The problem arises when you have large areas of a single hue with various shsdes. In your case, you have many shades of grey in your clouds. Grey is represented by all three channels being the same, so, in 8-bit, you have a maximum of 256 shades of grey. The conversion from 32 or16bit grey to 8-bit does not always produce sufficiently smooth gradations, leading to banding. Did you convert directly from 32-bit to 8-bit? Or 32-bit to 16-bit to 8-bit? The latter may give a smoother result than the former. John Quote Windows 11, Affinity Photo 2.4.2 Designer 2.4.2 and Publisher 2.4.2 (mainly Photo). CPU: Intel Core i5 8500 @ 3.00GHz. RAM: 32.0GB DDR4 @ 1063MHz, Graphics: 2047MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeepDesertPhoto Posted August 28, 2020 Author Share Posted August 28, 2020 3 hours ago, John Rostron said: The problem arises when you have large areas of a single hue with various shsdes. In your case, you have many shades of grey in your clouds. Grey is represented by all three channels being the same, so, in 8-bit, you have a maximum of 256 shades of grey. The conversion from 32 or16bit grey to 8-bit does not always produce sufficiently smooth gradations, leading to banding. Did you convert directly from 32-bit to 8-bit? Or 32-bit to 16-bit to 8-bit? The latter may give a smoother result than the former. John When I work on these type of images I first shoot the scene in Camera RAW, in my case it is a Nikon D810 set to NEF raw. I then open the NEFs with AP and do the development. I have AP set to open the NEFs in 32 bit RGB HDR, which preserves 100% of the original NEF quality while I do the development. When all the development is done I then save the file as an AP document preserving the 32 bit RGB quality. I then use that as the master copy which I use to produce a 16 bit LAB TIF file for printing and an 8 bit RGB JPEG which is for uploading to the stock agencies I sell my work through. I forgot about the 256 shades of gray limitation for JPG images. But I can see the banding to a smaller extent in the 16 bit LAB TIF file, which has not occurred before. John Rostron 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeepDesertPhoto Posted August 28, 2020 Author Share Posted August 28, 2020 I decided to rework the image. Since the banding was in areas that were darker with many shades of gray I simply reworked the image with a lighter sky with less gray. It does not have the high contrasts of an HDR image but at least it no longer has the banding issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Tudosiu Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 (edited) Hi, I have a similar problem where when I export I lose some fine shades from black to gray in my images, and I do not know if I do something wrong at exporting or is the limitation of the file format (JPEG/PNG/TIFF). I have attached my Affinity Photo (ver 1.8) project and the JPEG I exported. The area in question is on the two lamps above the drinks. Would really appreciate any help you can spare ❤️ Stay safe! Edit: I have exported the image in JPEG format and embedded my display's ICC profile and it looks fine, but I do not think I should do it, if I remember correctly I should embed sRGB standard ICC profile right? I have also attached the custom ICC JPEG as well. DSCF2205.afphoto Edited August 28, 2020 by Daniel Tudosiu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeepDesertPhoto Posted August 29, 2020 Author Share Posted August 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Daniel Tudosiu said: Hi, I have a similar problem where when I export I lose some fine shades from black to gray in my images, and I do not know if I do something wrong at exporting or is the limitation of the file format (JPEG/PNG/TIFF). I have attached my Affinity Photo (ver 1.8) project and the JPEG I exported. The area in question is on the two lamps above the drinks. Would really appreciate any help you can spare ❤️ Stay safe! Edit: I have exported the image in JPEG format and embedded my display's ICC profile and it looks fine, but I do not think I should do it, if I remember correctly I should embed sRGB standard ICC profile right? I have also attached the custom ICC JPEG as well. DSCF2205.afphoto 311.93 MB · 0 downloads If you're converting from 32 bit RGB to 8 bit RGB JPG, like the way I was, it is a limitation of the file format you're converting to, especially if it looks normal in 32 bit color. Like I mentioned in my posting I only encounter this problem when photographing cloudy sky with a lot of bluish grays, and I have also encountered this problem with blue skies that have gradually changing shades from light to dark. I was only able to solve the problem by lightening up the darker areas before converting it to a JPG. However, I always save a master copy in 32 bit color just in case AP releases a newer version in the future that might have better compression when converting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.