Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Different file size? Filter -> Noise -> Denoise VS Live Filter Denoise


Recommended Posts

On my own little research for minimising file size I noticed, that using the Live Filter Denoise produces smaller files than Filter -> Noise -> Denoise. For both ways I used the same values (everything at 100 %) and exported as TIFF without Affinity Layers.

Original TIFF = 7.134.526 Bytes

TIFF with Live Filter Denoise = 4.229.466 Bytes

TIFF with "normal" Denoise Filter = 4.301.104 Bytes

Is this because rasterising the Live Filter on export is more aggressive?

------
Windows 10 | i5-8500 CPU | Intel UHD 630 Graphics | 32 GB RAM | Latest Retail and Beta versions of complete Affinity range installed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Joachim_L said:

On my own little research for minimising file size I noticed, that using the Live Filter Denoise produces smaller files than Filter -> Noise -> Denoise. For both ways I used the same values (everything at 100 %) and exported as TIFF without Affinity Layers.

Original TIFF = 7.134.526 Bytes

TIFF with Live Filter Denoise = 4.229.466 Bytes

TIFF with "normal" Denoise Filter = 4.301.104 Bytes

Is this because rasterising the Live Filter on export is more aggressive?

My guess:
Real-time filters perform some kind of performance optimization at the expense of quality in exchange for faster speeds.

The more restricted you put on the program, the closer you program is to idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish it would be the same, as you can save a Live Filter as an Asset.

------
Windows 10 | i5-8500 CPU | Intel UHD 630 Graphics | 32 GB RAM | Latest Retail and Beta versions of complete Affinity range installed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Joachim_L said:

I wish it would be the same, as you can save a Live Filter as an Asset.

They should provide custom settings for live filters:
Performance or quality.

What do you think?:D

The more restricted you put on the program, the closer you program is to idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Joachim_L said:

Is this because rasterising the Live Filter on export is more aggressive?

Even using the same settings, I think the live filter and the non-live version work slightly differently, hence the differences in file size (?)

 

To save time I am currently using an automated AI to reply to some posts on this forum. If any of "my" posts are wrong or appear to be total b*ll*cks they are the ones generated by the AI. If correct they were probably mine. I apologise for any mistakes made by my AI - I'm sure it will improve with time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.