Maciek Blaźniak Posted May 22, 2020 Share Posted May 22, 2020 This one is critical bug. All elements that are rasterized during export to pdf (with the option "rasterise: unsupported properties" checked) have an ICC profile attached, despite the option "embed profiles" being unchecked. I have not found a workaround for this problem, except for editing the objects affected. EDIT: I'll also add that the same bug affects embedded external files. Quote http://behance.com/maciekblazniak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomaso Posted May 22, 2020 Share Posted May 22, 2020 Can you give info about the used vs. the wanted and unwanted profiles? What color space (~what profile) are the resources where you notice an embedded profile in your CMYK export? How do you notice their profile being embedded? In your setting you don't have "Convert..." checked, so, what do you expect to happen with resources which have a different profile than your CMYK document profile? Note that each resource has a color space which may be different from the one you selected as export profile for the PDF. With your setting e.g. an RGB image will maintain its RGB color space in the PDF. Quote macOS 10.14.6 | MacBookPro Retina 15" | Eizo 27" | Affinity V1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maciek Blaźniak Posted May 22, 2020 Author Share Posted May 22, 2020 32 minutes ago, thomaso said: Can you give info about the used vs. the wanted and unwanted profiles? What color space (~what profile) are the resources where you notice an embedded profile in your CMYK export? How do you notice their profile being embedded? In your setting you don't have "Convert..." checked, so, what do you expect to happen with resources which have a different profile than your CMYK document profile? Note that each resource has a color space which may be different from the one you selected as export profile for the PDF. With your setting e.g. an RGB image will maintain its RGB color space in the PDF. A lot of questions. I recorded a videos of how to reproduce the bug: https://www.dropbox.com/s/kujfs3z8k1b7mz3/1.mp4?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/qleysoonr7pt34i/2.mp4?dl=0 Quote http://behance.com/maciekblazniak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomaso Posted May 22, 2020 Share Posted May 22, 2020 As far I understand all is fine excepted for the green shape object, right? The green gets treated different than the red item, which is rasterized because of the involved blend mode (compare ~ adjustments and effects in PDF exports) When inspecting the PDF in Acrobat: Set the Simulation Profile according to your PDF, since it influences the inspection. So, instead using "U.S. Web Coated" select your "Munken" profile in this menu and possibly report again what you get. Note you also can upload video to the forum by clicking the "choose files..." link below your text area. Quote macOS 10.14.6 | MacBookPro Retina 15" | Eizo 27" | Affinity V1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maciek Blaźniak Posted May 22, 2020 Author Share Posted May 22, 2020 No, the red rectangle, which was automatically rasterised during export, has an embedded icc profile. Which is wrong, it shouldn't have it. No, changing the simulation profile does not solve the problem, it's just there for preview purposes. Quote http://behance.com/maciekblazniak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staff Gabe Posted May 27, 2020 Staff Share Posted May 27, 2020 Hi both, Sorry for the delayed reply Issue logged. Oval 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomaso Posted May 28, 2020 Share Posted May 28, 2020 I am not sure whether it is related (or will be fixed anyway with the issue mentioned above) but I wonder why the sRGB profile is mentioned for this PDF at all. Both color spaces, document + export, are CMYK, so I would not expect sRGB to be involved, in particular not for CMYK objects: v651 pdf1.7.pdf Also I am confused by the RGB image appearance when this .afpub gets exported as grayscale with a grayscale profile. Here grayscale seems to work for all objects (rgb, cmyk, blend modes) except the RGB image. v651 pdf1.7 grayscale.pdf Quote macOS 10.14.6 | MacBookPro Retina 15" | Eizo 27" | Affinity V1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staff Gabe Posted May 29, 2020 Staff Share Posted May 29, 2020 Any chance you can attach the afpub project file? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomaso Posted May 29, 2020 Share Posted May 29, 2020 Of cause. v651 export & profiles.afpub I added two more samples with blend mode "Difference", because this would result differently in RGB vs. CMYK. But the results confuse me even more: compare the 2 views in APub (rgb vs cmyk doc space) ... ... and the different views for the CMYK PDF in Acrobat, which shows different appearance for this blend mode when I activate the object inspector. However, the sRGB profile for "Mischfarbraum" (~ mixing color space) still is shown in this pdf, too. v651 pdf1.7 cmyk & difference.pdf I wonder whether my old Acrobat v10.1.16 (2012) is reporting correctly? Do you get the same with yours (probably in a younger version)? Quote macOS 10.14.6 | MacBookPro Retina 15" | Eizo 27" | Affinity V1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staff Gabe Posted June 1, 2020 Staff Share Posted June 1, 2020 Cheers. I get the same reading in the latest Acrobat Pro DC. Issue logged. PDF-x4 seems to work fine though. thomaso 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.