Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Expand stroke oddity


Recommended Posts

Matt, you said you wanted to be informed of any oddities with expand stroke.  First, I find that 99% of the time it's doing great for me.  I did notice that when using it for the attached file after I expanded the stroke the node handles looked great.   Test 1.afdesign

1267486340_ScreenShot2020-02-09at8_19_54AM.png.d7ef617a844dcad77aa2c1aa73f42390.png

I figured from what I could see is that there would only be one handle on each node, but when I moved most of the visible handles there is always a second handle that is behind the next node. 

1643977144_ScreenShot2020-02-09at8_20_56AM.png.bed09921a11b69323df12f36aac54a97.png

This second node is not visible until pressure is applied to the visible handle then suddenly the hidden handle pops into view.

385464615_ScreenShot2020-02-09at8_31_34AM.png.359df95cd60f2e74d4532aa7cb3c5a98.png      2062255023_ScreenShot2020-02-09at8_31_53AM.png.4977e28f09791e6792aa2613f618ab47.png

Is this supposed to be acting this way?  It seems that any handles that reside directly under the next node should be deleted in the conversion.  Why are they not visible until pressure is applied to the other handle in the pair?

Thanks for all the great work.  Mike

Edit: I also notice then if the neighboring node is moved before pressure is applied to the node handle, the length of the hidden node changes to keep the handle behind the node.

iMac (27-inch, Late 2009) with macOS Sierra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.