Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Search the Community

Showing results for tags '.afphotofile size'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Affinity Support
    • News and Information
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Affinity Support & Questions
    • Feedback & Suggestions
  • Learn and Share
    • Tutorials (Staff and Customer Created Tutorials)
    • Share your work
    • Resources
  • Bug Reporting
    • V2 Bugs found on macOS
    • V2 Bugs found on Windows
    • V2 Bugs found on iPad
    • Reports of Bugs in Affinity Version 1 applications
  • Beta Software Forums
    • 2.5 Beta New Features and Improvements
    • Other New Bugs and Issues in the Betas
    • Beta Software Program Members Area
    • [ARCHIVE] Reports from earlier Affinity betas

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Website URL


Location


Interests


Member Title

Found 1 result

  1. I'm unsure whether to post this as a bug or a feature request. If it's in the wrong place, moderators please move as needed. I mostly process Nikon D7200 RAW images. The image files mostly are between 27MB and 34MB. I notice that in AP 1.5.0.45, as in the betas before, a saved .afphoto project file is about 154MB, or about five times the original .nef raw image file. On the plus side I notice that adding snapshots and using 32-bit RGB color do not increase the size of the afphoto file. On the negative side, that's a big file. By comparison, Adobe Lightroom (which I am trying to get away from) just creates the very small .xmp file along with the original raw image file. (With Lightroom I do not routinely convert to DNG.) So the overhead added storage per image is frequently less than 10KB and almost always less than 100KB. I understand that AP stores a bitmap in the afphoto project file and assume this causes a lot of the large file size. Nonetheless, that is a large pill to swallow. If I have, say, 250 images to edit from a trip this creates a lot of extra hard drive space. And at the moment I have about 11,000 images total in my Lightroom catalog. Adding 154MB per image is a lot. Is the file size as expected from a design perspective? If not, can it be fixed? If it is as designed, is there any hope of somehow using the original raw file rather than a bitmap, not incorporating a bitmap in the project file, and reducing the added storage per image to, say, 10MB? Thanks, Pete
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.