Daviddesign

Hi,
M favorite is the first one, since it'll stay readable at smaller format or low resolution .

I agree with Wosven, the first one has better reproducibility at different sizes and the typeface gives an impression of 'solidity'.
The second one is too detailed and the typeface doesn't look right to me. Nice graphics, just not right for a logo.
The third one is nice but isn't great at smaller sizes.
One small issue I have with the first one is that it looks like the containers have fallen over, maybe there was bad weather at sea. That may not be the image the company wants to give out.
Also, on a related note, have you thought about a black and white or grey-scale version of the logo? What does it look like when the colour has been removed? Does the logo still 'work' when there's no colour?
All-in-all though, some nice ideas there.

My logo design idea! For warehouse company. 

My last work for nail studio. Plan/printed
Logo design
Windowshop design
namecard design
 

The logo design idea is the flower because the name “bellis” latin word it means daisy flower.  thanks for youre feedback i want to learn because i want to better and better designer  

My last work for nail studio. Plan/printed
Logo design
Windowshop design
namecard design
 

And at last.. why is this the only line without capital letter? 
If it is a continuation of the previous text, I think it should be more close.. 
but as I said, I don’t understand what is says :-) 

In my personal opinion, the text isn’t very well placed in the wooden frame.. I think it’s way to close to the frame edge, and the space between the top text and the rest is way too much. 
The beige part (bottom right corner) takes way too much attention and makes the text and the pictures disappear. 
For me, the design, even the “nails” (if it is) in the logo, disappear a little in the crowd. 
I don’t usually go and fix my nails tho, but I’m not sure I would choose this place, if I did.. 
business cards looks alright tho :-) 

Not sure what all the text says, but my eyes says it’s more space between the text here (look the red lines) than the rest.. but maybe it’s a reason if I understood the text. 

I think that that image is an older version of the sign. If you look at the image at the very top of the thread, you can actually see the letter being in capital already.

My last work for nail studio. Plan/printed
Logo design
Windowshop design
namecard design
 

With all design there has to be a relationship between the elements of that design, how the background interacts with the letters, if you just put elements together without considering such things it can look... stuck together instead of being a considered design where each element is a part of the whole.
I think on the last one, a stronger image would be had by changing the large D's I don't think those D's work, they are neither different enough to make a statement nor close enough to the smaller letters to give a consistency.
I'm also not sure on the colours, what do they mean, what's their story?
The curves that make the colour background could be reworked to better effect as well, they look like they were just put there, they are not in a symbiotic relationship with the words and letters.

Or by changing the small ones!  I agree that they don’t work well together.
The word ‘DESIGN’ needs to be moved up a little. At the moment it looks as though it’s falling off the bottom of the background shape.

Thank you guys for advice!  

I think I like the third one best. I quite like the first one, too, but the contrast is rather low since the background is so dark.

Same as you Elfred,
but the first one can be part of a graphical chart, with usual colours to use with the logo, or on wall, etc. since this give a rich feeling.

Hi,
The first one is too more like a show of pkayinf around with nices features, but lisibility is difficult and we can begin of ways to have it simpler... It looks more like a rought than a final logo.
The second one is interesting, but there're lisibility problems too : it'll be difficult to read at a smaller size.
The third is best : easy to read, and we can find elements we can reuse to have smaller but easily reconizable and rzadable version, and we can imagine through time other simpler versions using part of the design, of the colours, etc. A smaller version wirh only the shapes, colours ans Ds... A next one in few years with another version of DD as modernisation, etc.
That's the one with more possibilities and the more interesting for me