Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Steps

Members
  • Posts

    814
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Steps

  1. I downloaded some vector files from shutterstock which are supposed to be "EPS10" files.

    All of them look broken and differ from what they should look like.

    Are there known problems with EPS10 import?

    For example https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/abstract-wavy-black-texture-background-710719411 looks like this:

    shutterstock_710719411.jpg.6a6682c15cd435959e36bed4184dd970.jpg

    And https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/abstract-composition-text-frame-surface-green-482195155 becomes this:

    shutterstock_482195155.jpg.c82837574d08b3d96fda1d6901df92a4.jpg

    Here is a free to download example of a EPS file that's broken if opened with Designer:
    https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/dark-black-background-with-triangle-shapes_5548585.htm

    What's the problem here?

    Kind regards

    Steps

  2. On 10/15/2019 at 9:48 AM, _fluffy said:

    Yeah, and I kinda hate to say it, but every time I try using Affinity Serif software I keep on getting just enough little UI papercuts that keep me going back to Adobe products.

    This is pretty normal. If you search the forum you will find a lot of people that say "If XY would be possible, I could finally cancel my Adobe subscription".

    I see two categories here: People who demand tools that are just right not there like a DAM ("Lightroom replacement") and people that basicly have all they want and just struggle with minor missing convenience functions. For me the latter is the case.

    On 10/15/2019 at 9:48 AM, _fluffy said:

    "That's how this software is, deal with it."

    Indeed. First it's annoying that nobody really seems to really want improvements anymore, but after two years I can see where this comes from: It's really kind of giving it up and dealing with it. I reported many many problems for Publisher two years ago and none got solved. And sometimes I find really old ones that still are not handeled, because an iPad version has priority.

    On 10/15/2019 at 9:48 AM, _fluffy said:

    I'm just getting frustrated with having to pay $$$ every year to keep Photoshop working, when it's not like I'm even using any of the new features they keep adding (but good luck getting the final non-subscription version installed/working/etc. on a current-gen Mac...)

    "You get what you pay for." - The price point is really a very big factor here.

    I would in no way accept all the problems Affinity still has for Adobes pricing. But this here is another story.

    You should really see if the tools offer enough that justifies the money for you and base your decision on that. I bought the whole Affinity suite at the last sale, because I tested Publisher intensively in the Beta and found it suitable for my needs - even if there are many bugs and general UX problems.

    But I don't get or feel that excitement that some writers of blog posts have. Affinity is really hyped. Personally I don't feel that this is justified.
    To me it's good software at a price point where I can accept all the problems and see my investment justified. But I don't feel that I paid too less.

     

  3. @pekranodon If not explicitely mentioned in a changelog you can consider bugs still existing.

    And some problems are really around since the beginning. Don't have too high hopes.

    I also changed my mind... From wanting Affinity to be perfect I now say to myself:
    "I can achieve what I want with this tool, even if complicated and time-consuming, and I paid only 50 dollars - so it's okay."

  4. 2 hours ago, ChristiduToit said:

    Having to customise those settings every time you open the app feels almost like if you had to reset all the clocks and watches in your house every time you wake up, rewrite an entire recipe every time you want to make a meal, or recreate an email account from scratch every time you want to send an email. I know those analogies seem weird, but it honestly feels like it's that unnecessary. 

    It is. You nailed it.

  5. On 10/5/2019 at 1:53 PM, gw_westdale said:

    Although the OP was about  PDF1.3,  problems exist for PDF 1.7 as well.  Transparent items come out much paler in the PDF file - the rasterisation used in export to PDF appears to be broken - pre-rasterising transparent areas before exporting fixes it - but at a cost in terms of usability.

    Indeed. Ran into that problem recently.

    Transparency seems to be a big problem with that used 3rd party lib.

    I wonder if there are alternatives...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.