Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

cbolt

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cbolt

  1. Thank you all- I have been using PS for years and really want to love AD/AP but this is proving to be a much more complicated transition than I expected. I understand there is a learning curve here but this is frustrating. I have to say at this point the workflow for resizing/prepping for the web in PS works flawlessly and I can complete it in about 3 very straightforward steps in about 30sec per image. I am convinced there is some aspect of this process that I am missing- maybe that's the learning curve of a new app?  I'll look forward to more posts about this as I'm sure I'm not the first to be struggling with this. best,cb

     

  2. 4 hours ago, JimmyJack said:

    This is what I get with Lanczos non-sep.
    PNG (which is of course lossless) and JPG best (lossy nonetheless). But both are much crisper than the example above

    1245445518_WardRyder.jpg.a2aadc7d37718814d8a725cd305da979nonsep.png.8a18006a4ce618ce3339fa2d996f7494.png 1245445518_WardRyder.jpg.a2aadc7d37718814d8a725cd305da979jpgnonsep.jpg.71fd6f88fa68141b1578d5728b9b8a19.jpg

    thank you for your response. So it sounds like Lanczos non-sep and having PNG being my final image setting is a better route than jpg?

    So save them as PNG files then reduce image using the Lanczos non-sep setting....is that what youre suggesting?  

    I will have to ultimately turn these into web-friendly images but needed to start at the print quality resizing first.

    Best, cb

     

  3. 10 hours ago, gdenby said:

    It appears to me that there are .jpg compression artifacts in both images. So by reducing the size, the sample blocks are merged into ever coarser averages. I don't do enough image processing to know, but I'll suggest  try de-noising the larger, or do a frequency separation before making the image smaller. 

    Thank you for the response and feedback- so should I not resample? Would this workflow be different of you were prepping images for web use? Is de-noising and frequency separation simply a work around to an app glitch? Resizing seems like a pretty simple/basic task to do on a photo editing app to have to do a work around to make it so. : ((

  4. 4 hours ago, v_kyr said:

    As the preposters said or already indicated, this is also the reason why certain software optional offers to apply a little bit of auto-sharpening together when image resizing operations are performed.

    thanks for the message and feedback- does it matter at what point in process auto-sharpening is done? Do I do this to images that are resized for web use also?

    best,cb

     

  5. 5 hours ago, R C-R said:

    You reduced the image from 1200  x 1567 px to 306 x 400 px, so to begin with the aspect ratio is not quite the same, but more to the point you reduced the total number of pixels to around 1/15th of the original total.

    Basically, that means all the color & sharpness info of each ~15x15 pixel area of the original has been reduced to about one pixel, so there is no way that pixel can retain all those colors or sharpness.

    so how do I resize an image to retain its sharpness? Im accustomed to PS with the experience that reducing image dimensions didnt reduce its pixels but maybe it did and I was so accustomed to the process in PS that I didnt realize it? I'd love to make the shift from CC to AD/AP but am trying to keep my workflow tidy. Thank you for your message/help. cb

  6. Starting with a 4mb image (1200x1567px) and trying to crop and reduce image size. Pixel ratio to remain the same....fuzzy and pixelated everytime. grrr

    I have tried all the suggested ways- resampling, bicubic and lanczos options. Why would my image be more fuzzy at a reduction in scale?

    Ward Ryder_400x.jpg

    Ward Ryder.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.