Jump to content
You must now use your email address to sign in [click for more info] ×

Ballyshannon

Members
  • Posts

    69
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ballyshannon

  1. Thanks for the input! As mentioned in my update above, I was able to figure it out and @gdenby, it appears we used the same process. Here is the final result added to the Celestron 11" SCT I created from scratch. Still doing some tweaking, but it's getting close. I've only been working with Designer for about a month now, and am really enjoying it.

     

     

     

    Telescope2_small.jpg

  2. Here's the image. I want to use the small finder scope attached to the telescope for another project and have it outlined for subtracting the telescope. There are three other areas of white outlined in red that I want removed from the finderscope.

    Finderscope_subtract open spaces.afdesign

     

    UPDATE: Figured it out. I first moved the main image into the outline layer to remove the main telescope image, leaving only the finderscope. I then moved each of the curves outlining the areas I wanted removed to the top of the layers list (above the grouping layer). I then selected all layers and used the subtract function to remove the open spaces. Worked great.

  3. I do high end magazine/publication layout, and always have to convert client-supplied RGB jpg images/photos to CMYK in Photoshop for print. It's usually not a problem other than watching for color shift, especially blues and reds. Blue skies turn purple and reds go orange, both requiring correcting.

    Personally, I always design client logos in 300 dpi CMYK from the start. That way, if they need it for print, they're covered. If they need it for web or other RGB based media, CMYK can easily be converted to RGB, usually without color shifts.

  4. Thank you MEB. I understand that the exported images will only look their best at 100%. However, as I mentioned, viewing the images at 100% in AD produces a lower quality image than when viewed in Photoshop at 100%...as you say, due to differences in how each program renders images. I haven't been using AD long, but so far, neon text is the only project I've experienced this issue with, most likely due to the intense fx used. All other project exports look the same as the native file when viewed in AD.

  5. Here is the original AD file, although the specific fonts may not be loaded on the system viewing the file. However, if the fonts are substituted, the file would simply show a different font with the same neon effects. The fonts used are Pipeline and Swiss721BdOul BT. I've also included a zoomed-in screen capture of the original AD file, and a zoomed-in exported JPG in Photoshop. I was viewing the exported files in AD when seeing the jaggedness, but interestingly,  the exported images look much better in Photoshop than AD. The JPG in Photoshop actually looks pretty good.

    Sorry, should have specified I'm using Affinity Designer.

     

    Neon2.afdesign

    Neon AD native file screen capture.jpg

    Neon exported JPG screen capture in Photoshop.jpg

  6. I've been working with different ways to do neon text created at 300dpi and have produced some nice results, but every time I export at 300dpi using PDF, EPS, or JPG, the overall quality drops. And corners, curves, and angled lines in the text are jagged, as well as the outer glow and basic effects not looking nearly as good as the original Affinity file. I've tried various export settings but nothing looks usable in a project. The only way neon text looks the same as designed is if I do a screen capture, but then it's 72dpi. I can change the dpi to 300 in Photoshop when pasting the image, but the size then goes from 8" to 3". Ideas?

  7. On 10/13/2018 at 11:14 AM, Kiarian said:

    What farukkk said. I'm in the middle of something now, vectorising an image. All I need to do is slightly warp some text. Now I have to try and find my old Adobe Illustrator log in details and install the dreaded Adobe software.
    Hate the Adobe Suite, and I still cannot get my head around Affinity not releasing a basic text warp tool for Designer. I've been reading the original post, and it goes back to 2015.
    This isn't any hate on Affinity, love the software, but I cannot see how anyone doing any graphic design can not go back to Illustrator for this one tool. It's such a staple tool for any sort of logo design. Boggles the mind why it isn't a priority!?

    Exactly. Corel Draw was able to warp text from the start MANY, MANY years ago. Basically Affinity is a good program but it's disappointing that any vector program in 2018 is incapable of warping text since it's such an important tool for any designer.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.